樂觀的追溯性資金因公共產品遺漏和缺乏社區投入而受到批評

Optimism 最新的追溯融資計劃旨在獎勵加密貨幣項目的貢獻，但因其背離了最初對公共產品的關注而面臨批評。儘管撥款 30 億美元，但一些社區成員對公共產品的重視程度降低以及關鍵變革缺乏投入表示失望。品牌從「追溯性公共物品資助」到「追溯性資助」的轉變也引發了人們對 Optimism 生態系統內的透明度和去中心化的擔憂。

Optimism's Retroactive Funding Program Draws Criticism for Deviation from Public Goods Emphasis and Lack of Community Input

樂觀主義的追溯資助計畫因偏離公共產品重點和缺乏社區投入而受到批評

Optimism's fourth iteration of retroactive funding, an initiative designed to reward crypto projects based on their current impact, has faced criticism from certain quarters. The detractors have expressed disappointment over the reduced emphasis on public goods and the lack of community involvement in the decision-making process.

Optimism 的第四次追溯資助計畫是一項旨在根據加密貨幣項目當前影響進行獎勵的舉措，但遭到了某些方面的批評。批評者對減少對公共物品的重視以及缺乏社區參與決策過程表示失望。

Initially dubbed "Retroactive Public Goods Funding" (RPGF), the program has now been rebranded as "Retro Funding," a change that has omitted the "public goods" element. This shift has dismayed some within the crypto community, who argue that it dilutes Optimism's original vision of supporting developers, businesses, and educators who contribute to its layer 2 blockchain network built on Ethereum.

該計劃最初被稱為“追溯性公共物品資助”（RPGF），現已更名為“追溯性資助”，這一變化省略了“公共物品”元素。這一轉變令加密社群中的一些人感到沮喪，他們認為這削弱了Optimism 最初的願景，即支持為其構建在以太坊上的第2 層區塊鏈網路做出貢獻的開發人員、企業和教育工作者。

Lefteris Karapetsas, founder of portfolio tracking service Rotki, characterized the departure from public goods as "appalling." He expressed his dissatisfaction in Optimism's forum discussion, lamenting that the change was made unilaterally by the Optimism Foundation.

投資組合追蹤服務 Rotki 的創始人 Lefteris Karapetsas 將公共產品的背離描述為「令人震驚」。他對樂觀主義論壇的討論表示不滿，感嘆這種改變是樂觀主義基金會單方面做出的。

"Was it just a meme to pull us all in, have good marketing for the superchain [the name of the network of blockchains that rely on Optimism's OP stack] and then when that's accomplished, we just throw the public goods out?," Karapetsas asked.

「這是否只是一個迷因來吸引我們所有人，為超級鏈（依賴Optimism OP 堆疊的區塊鏈網路的名稱）進行良好的行銷，然後當這一切完成後，我們就將公共產品扔掉？ 」Karapetsas問道。

In response to the criticism, Lynette Nolan, head of communications for Optimism Unlimited, a subsidiary of the Optimism Foundation, clarified that the name change was intended to enhance clarity and accessibility for newcomers in the crypto ecosystem. She explained that research and focus group feedback indicated that the term "RPGF" was mainly understood by those already engaged with the Optimism ecosystem.

針對這些批評，樂觀基金會子公司 Optimism Unlimited 的通訊主管 Lynette Nolan 澄清稱，更名的目的是為了提高加密生態系統新人的清晰度和可訪問性。她解釋說，研究和焦點小組回饋表明，「RPGF」一詞主要是那些已經參與 Optimism 生態系統的人所理解的。

However, some community members remained unconvinced by the explanation. Paul Dylan-Ennis, assistant professor at the College of Business, University College Dublin, expressed concern about the timing of the change, which he viewed as a setback for the "Regen" (regenerative) vision pioneered by Optimism. He lamented that the funding round had become indistinguishable from similar programs in other layer 2 protocols.

然而，一些社區成員對這項解釋仍然不服氣。都柏林大學學院商學院助理教授保羅·迪倫-恩尼斯（Paul Dylan-Ennis）對這一變革的時機表示擔憂，他認為這是對樂觀主義倡導的「Regen」（再生）願景的挫折。他感嘆這一輪融資與其他第 2 層協議中的類似項目沒有什麼區別。

Beyond the name change, critics also raised concerns about the lack of community involvement in the decision-making process. Tim Daub, founder of web3-focused Kiwi News, asserted that the decision to exclude public goods in name was not formally sanctioned by the OP community. He argued that the community had not been given an opportunity to express its views on the matter.

除了更名之外，批評者也對決策過程中缺乏社區參與表示擔憂。專注於 web3 的 Kiwi News 創始人 Tim Daub 聲稱，名義上排除公共物品的決定並未得到 OP 社區的正式批准。他認為社區沒有機會表達對此事的看法。

This perceived lack of decentralization has further fueled criticism of the latest funding round. Latruite.eth, a user in the Optimism forum, expressed mixed feelings about the program. They questioned the value of decentralized governance if the Foundation retained the authority to make all important decisions.

這種被認為缺乏權力下放的現象進一步加劇了對最新一輪融資的批評。 Optimism 論壇的用戶 Latruite.eth 表達了對該計劃的複雜感受。他們質疑如果基金會保留做出所有重要決策的權力，那麼就去中心化治理的價值。

Despite the criticism, Nolan maintained that public goods remain central to Retro Funding's mission, even if the term is no longer included in the official name.

儘管受到批評，諾蘭堅持認為，公共產品仍然是復古基金使命的核心，即使該術語不再包含在官方名稱中。

The market reaction to the news has been muted, with OP, the native governance token for Optimism, experiencing a modest decline of 2.4% over the past 24 hours, trading at $3.61 at the time of writing.

市場對此消息反應平淡，OP（Optimism 的原生治理代幣）在過去 24 小時內小幅下跌 2.4%，在撰寫本文時交易價格為 3.61 美元。