DAO Maker 的影響：受害者指責平台未能償還被駭客入侵的資金，涉嫌掩蓋事實

與 MakerDAO 不同，DAO Maker 募款平台計劃在 2024 年為 Web3 專案籌集資金。 DeFi 研究人員 SOMA Analytics 聲稱 DAO Maker 透過提案取消了補償計劃，利用其代幣供應來確保投票結果。據稱，該提案被刪除是為了掩蓋該團隊未能賠償受害者的事實。 DAO Maker 與 MakerDAO 無關，尚未回覆 Cointelegraph 的置評請求。

DAO Maker Fallout: Victims Accuse Platform of Failing to Reimburse Hacked Funds Amid Allegations of Cover-Up

DAO Maker 的影響：受害者指責平台因掩蓋指控而未能償還被駭客入侵的資金

In the realm of decentralized finance (DeFi), the DAO Maker crypto fundraising platform has come under fire from victims of a 2021 hack who allege that they have yet to be compensated for their losses, despite promises of reimbursement from the project's development team. Victims contend that the hack, which resulted in the theft of approximately $7 million in user funds, occurred due to the negligence of DAO Maker's developers, and that the platform is therefore liable for the losses.

在去中心化金融 (DeFi) 領域，DAO Maker 加密募款平台受到了 2021 年駭客攻擊受害者的攻擊，他們聲稱儘管該專案的開發團隊承諾賠償，但他們的損失尚未得到賠償。受害者聲稱，這次駭客攻擊導致約 700 萬美元的用戶資金被盜，這是由於 DAO Maker 開發人員的疏忽造成的，因此該平台應對損失負責。

In the aftermath of the August 2021 exploit, DAO Maker acknowledged that the private key compromise was the cause of the breach. The platform initially vowed to compensate investors with an immediate airdrop of 500 USD Coin (USDC) per person, followed by the distribution of an "IOU token" called USDR, which would become redeemable for DAO tokens at prevailing prices within a year.

在 2021 年 8 月的漏洞利用之後，DAO Maker 承認私鑰外洩是這次外洩的原因。該平台最初承諾立即空投每人 500 美元硬幣（USDC）來補償投資者，隨後分發名為 USDR 的“IOU 代幣”，該代幣將在一年內以現行價格兌換為 DAO 代幣。

However, victims of the hack claim that USDR redemptions were never allowed, leaving them with uncompensated losses. DeFi researcher SOMA Analytics has unearthed evidence suggesting that DAO Maker forced through a proposal with its governing body to cancel the reimbursement plan, leveraging its substantial token supply to ensure the vote's outcome. The researcher alleges that the proposal was subsequently deleted in an apparent attempt to conceal the project's failure to fulfill its compensation commitments.

然而，駭客攻擊的受害者聲稱，美元兌美元從未被允許贖回，這給他們帶來了無法彌補的損失。 DeFi 研究人員 SOMA Analytics 發現的證據表明，DAO Maker 強迫其管理機構透過提案取消補償計劃，利用其大量的代幣供應來確保投票結果。研究人員聲稱，該提案隨後被刪除，顯然是為了掩蓋該項目未能履行其補償承諾的事實。

Speaking with Cointelegraph, several victims described their experiences. "Red Drac," a Telegram user who lost $2,000 in the hack, explained that after receiving the initial 500 USDT airdrop, they were promised 1,500 USDR tokens, which ultimately proved to be worthless due to the lack of redemption options.

幾位受害者在接受 Cointelegraph 採訪時描述了他們的經歷。在這次駭客攻擊中損失2,000 美元的Telegram 用戶「Red Drac」解釋說，在收到最初的500 USDT 空投後，他們被承諾獲得1,500 USDR 代幣，但由於缺乏贖回選項，這些代幣最終被證明一文不值。

Zztelecom, another Telegram user, recounted a similar story, stating that they purchased 10,000 USDR tokens with the expectation of redeeming them for $10,000 worth of DAO. However, the tokens never became redeemable and are now effectively worthless on the secondary market.

另一位 Telegram 用戶 Zztelecom 講述了一個類似的故事，稱他們購買了 10,000 個 USDR 代幣，希望將其兌換為價值 10,000 美元的 DAO。然而，這些代幣從未可贖回，現在在二級市場上實際上一文不值。

SOMA Analytics has presented compelling evidence of a potential cover-up by the DAO Maker team. The researcher claims that the team created a proposal to abandon the USDR redemption process, which was passed and then subsequently deleted from the Snapshot webpage. The proposal allegedly received support from a small number of wallets that cast a disproportionate number of votes, indicating potential manipulation by the team.

SOMA Analytics 提供了令人信服的證據，證明 DAO Maker 團隊可能掩蓋事實。研究人員聲稱，該團隊創建了一項放棄 USDR 贖回流程的提案，該提案獲得通過，隨後從 Snapshot 網頁中刪除。據稱，該提案得到了少數錢包的支持，這些錢包投出了不成比例的選票，表明該團隊可能存在操縱行為。

DAO Maker's victims acknowledge that the USDR token allows them to gain DAO Power, which enhances their chances of participating in token offerings they find attractive. However, they argue that the team has effectively rendered the tokens worthless by denying redemption options and making DAO Power non-transferable.

DAO Maker 的受害者承認 USDR 代幣使他們能夠獲得 DAO Power，這增加了他們參與他們認為有吸引力的代幣產品的機會。然而，他們認為，該團隊透過拒絕贖回選項並使 DAO Power 不可轉讓，實際上使代幣變得毫無價值。

Despite the victims' allegations and the findings of SOMA Analytics, DAO Maker has not publicly responded to the accusations. The platform continues to provide fundraising services to Web3 startups, and its DAO token maintains a market cap of approximately $153 million, placing it among the top 400 cryptocurrencies.

儘管受害者提出指控以及 SOMA Analytics 的調查結果，但 DAO Maker 尚未公開回應這些指控。該平台繼續為 Web3 新創公司提供籌款服務，其 DAO 代幣的市值保持在約 1.53 億美元，躋身前 400 名加密貨幣之列。

The case of DAO Maker serves as a cautionary tale about the risks associated with DeFi and the importance of holding projects accountable for their actions. Victims of the hack have expressed frustration and anger over their uncompensated losses, while the lack of transparency and communication from DAO Maker has further eroded trust in the platform. As the DeFi ecosystem continues to evolve and attract new participants, it is crucial that these platforms prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user funds.

DAO Maker 的案例對 DeFi 相關風險以及讓專案對其行為負責的重要性起到了警示作用。駭客攻擊的受害者對其未得到補償的損失表示沮喪和憤怒，而 DAO Maker 缺乏透明度和溝通進一步削弱了對該平台的信任。隨著 DeFi 生態系統不斷發展並吸引新的參與者，這些平台優先考慮透明度、問責制和用戶資金保護至關重要。