DAO Maker 的影响：受害者指责平台未能偿还被黑客入侵的资金，涉嫌掩盖事实

与 MakerDAO 不同，DAO Maker 筹款平台计划在 2024 年为 Web3 项目筹集资金。然而，2021 年黑客攻击的受害者声称，尽管承诺赔偿，但他们尚未收到赔偿。 DeFi 研究人员 SOMA Analytics 声称 DAO Maker 通过提案取消了补偿计划，利用其代币供应来确保投票结果。据称，该提案被删除是为了掩盖该团队未能赔偿受害者的事实。 DAO Maker 与 MakerDAO 无关，并且尚未回复 Cointelegraph 的置评请求。

DAO Maker Fallout: Victims Accuse Platform of Failing to Reimburse Hacked Funds Amid Allegations of Cover-Up

DAO Maker 的影响：受害者指责平台因掩盖指控而未能偿还被黑客入侵的资金

In the realm of decentralized finance (DeFi), the DAO Maker crypto fundraising platform has come under fire from victims of a 2021 hack who allege that they have yet to be compensated for their losses, despite promises of reimbursement from the project's development team. Victims contend that the hack, which resulted in the theft of approximately $7 million in user funds, occurred due to the negligence of DAO Maker's developers, and that the platform is therefore liable for the losses.

在去中心化金融 (DeFi) 领域，DAO Maker 加密筹款平台受到了 2021 年黑客攻击受害者的攻击，他们声称尽管该项目的开发团队承诺赔偿，但他们的损失尚未得到赔偿。受害者声称，这次黑客攻击导致约 700 万美元的用户资金被盗，这是由于 DAO Maker 开发人员的疏忽造成的，因此该平台应对损失负责。

In the aftermath of the August 2021 exploit, DAO Maker acknowledged that the private key compromise was the cause of the breach. The platform initially vowed to compensate investors with an immediate airdrop of 500 USD Coin (USDC) per person, followed by the distribution of an "IOU token" called USDR, which would become redeemable for DAO tokens at prevailing prices within a year.

在 2021 年 8 月的漏洞利用之后，DAO Maker 承认私钥泄露是此次泄露的原因。该平台最初承诺立即空投每人 500 美元硬币（USDC）来补偿投资者，随后分发名为 USDR 的“IOU 代币”，该代币将在一年内以现行价格兑换为 DAO 代币。

However, victims of the hack claim that USDR redemptions were never allowed, leaving them with uncompensated losses. DeFi researcher SOMA Analytics has unearthed evidence suggesting that DAO Maker forced through a proposal with its governing body to cancel the reimbursement plan, leveraging its substantial token supply to ensure the vote's outcome. The researcher alleges that the proposal was subsequently deleted in an apparent attempt to conceal the project's failure to fulfill its compensation commitments.

然而，黑客攻击的受害者声称，美元兑美元从未被允许赎回，这给他们带来了无法弥补的损失。 DeFi 研究人员 SOMA Analytics 发现的证据表明，DAO Maker 强迫其管理机构通过一项提案取消补偿计划，利用其大量的代币供应来确保投票结果。研究人员声称，该提案随后被删除，显然是为了掩盖该项目未能履行其补偿承诺的事实。

Speaking with Cointelegraph, several victims described their experiences. "Red Drac," a Telegram user who lost $2,000 in the hack, explained that after receiving the initial 500 USDT airdrop, they were promised 1,500 USDR tokens, which ultimately proved to be worthless due to the lack of redemption options.

几位受害者在接受 Cointelegraph 采访时描述了他们的经历。在此次黑客攻击中损失 2,000 美元的 Telegram 用户“Red Drac”解释说，在收到最初的 500 USDT 空投后，他们被承诺获得 1,500 USDR 代币，但由于缺乏赎回选项，这些代币最终被证明一文不值。

Zztelecom, another Telegram user, recounted a similar story, stating that they purchased 10,000 USDR tokens with the expectation of redeeming them for $10,000 worth of DAO. However, the tokens never became redeemable and are now effectively worthless on the secondary market.

另一位 Telegram 用户 Zztelecom 讲述了一个类似的故事，称他们购买了 10,000 个 USDR 代币，希望将其兑换为价值 10,000 美元的 DAO。然而，这些代币从未可赎回，现在在二级市场上实际上一文不值。

SOMA Analytics has presented compelling evidence of a potential cover-up by the DAO Maker team. The researcher claims that the team created a proposal to abandon the USDR redemption process, which was passed and then subsequently deleted from the Snapshot webpage. The proposal allegedly received support from a small number of wallets that cast a disproportionate number of votes, indicating potential manipulation by the team.

SOMA Analytics 提供了令人信服的证据，证明 DAO Maker 团队可能掩盖事实。研究人员声称，该团队创建了一项放弃 USDR 赎回流程的提案，该提案获得通过，随后从 Snapshot 网页中删除。据称，该提案得到了少数钱包的支持，这些钱包投出了不成比例的选票，表明该团队可能存在操纵行为。

DAO Maker's victims acknowledge that the USDR token allows them to gain DAO Power, which enhances their chances of participating in token offerings they find attractive. However, they argue that the team has effectively rendered the tokens worthless by denying redemption options and making DAO Power non-transferable.

DAO Maker 的受害者承认 USDR 代币使他们能够获得 DAO Power，这增加了他们参与他们认为有吸引力的代币产品的机会。然而，他们认为，该团队通过拒绝赎回选项并使 DAO Power 不可转让，实际上使代币变得毫无价值。

Despite the victims' allegations and the findings of SOMA Analytics, DAO Maker has not publicly responded to the accusations. The platform continues to provide fundraising services to Web3 startups, and its DAO token maintains a market cap of approximately $153 million, placing it among the top 400 cryptocurrencies.

尽管受害者提出指控以及 SOMA Analytics 的调查结果，但 DAO Maker 尚未公开回应这些指控。该平台继续为 Web3 初创公司提供筹款服务，其 DAO 代币的市值保持在约 1.53 亿美元，跻身前 400 名加密货币之列。

The case of DAO Maker serves as a cautionary tale about the risks associated with DeFi and the importance of holding projects accountable for their actions. Victims of the hack have expressed frustration and anger over their uncompensated losses, while the lack of transparency and communication from DAO Maker has further eroded trust in the platform. As the DeFi ecosystem continues to evolve and attract new participants, it is crucial that these platforms prioritize transparency, accountability, and the protection of user funds.

DAO Maker 的案例对 DeFi 相关风险以及让项目对其行为负责的重要性起到了警示作用。黑客攻击的受害者对其未得到补偿的损失表示沮丧和愤怒，而 DAO Maker 缺乏透明度和沟通进一步削弱了对该平台的信任。随着 DeFi 生态系统不断发展并吸引新的参与者，这些平台优先考虑透明度、问责制和用户资金保护至关重要。