有爭議的裁判呼籲孟買印第安人的 IPL 競選活動變得黑暗

在一場備受爭議的 IPL 比賽中，孟買印第安人隊 (MI) 以 9 分的優勢擊敗旁遮普國王隊 (PBKS)。儘管 MI 的總比分是 192/7，但 PBKS 仍對 Shashank Singh（41 歲）和 Ashutosh Sharma（61 歲）的反擊抱有一線希望。這場比賽因裁判爭議而受到破壞，包括拋硬幣爭議、對 RCB 的「額外審查」以及 MI 與 PBKS 比賽中的休息區信號。

Mumbai Indians' Controversial Umpiring Calls Mar IPL 2024 Campaign

孟買印第安人隊備受爭議的裁判呼籲 3 月 IPL 2024 競選活動

Maharaja Yadavindra Singh Cricket Stadium, Chandigarh, April 19, 2024

Maharaja Yadavindra Singh 板球場，昌迪加爾，2024 年 4 月 19 日

Controversy has plagued the Mumbai Indians (MI) throughout the 2024 Indian Premier League (IPL) season, with several contentious umpiring decisions raising eyebrows. The latest incident occurred during MI's match against Punjab Kings (PBKS) on Thursday, where the visitors prevailed by nine runs.

在整個 2024 年印度超級聯賽 (IPL) 賽季中，爭議一直困擾著孟買印地安人隊 (MI)，幾項有爭議的裁判決定引起了人們的關注。最近的事件發生在周四 MI 對陣旁遮普國王隊 (PBKS) 的比賽中，當時客隊以九分獲勝。

PBKS vs MI: Controversial Umpiring Decisions

PBKS vs MI：有爭議的裁判決定

In the PBKS match, MI benefited from a dubious wide call in their favor in the third umpire's review. Additionally, television cameras captured MI dugout personnel signaling to batters in the middle to review a dismissal, which is against the rules.

在 PBKS 比賽中，MI 在第三位裁判的評審中受益於一個可疑的對他們有利的廣泛判罰。此外，電視攝影機捕捉到MI休息室人員向中間的擊球手發出信號以審查解僱，這是違反規則的。

The dugout signal incident mirrored a similar controversy in a recent Test match between India and Australia, where Steve Smith was denied a review after receiving a signal from the dressing room.

休息室信號事件反映了最近印度和澳洲之間的一場測試賽中類似的爭議，史蒂夫史密斯在收到更衣室的信號後被拒絕接受審查。

Other Controversies in MI's Season

MI賽季的其他爭議

The MI-PBKS match was not the first time the team has courted controversy this season. Earlier in the month, during their home match against Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), a coin toss controversy erupted.

MI-PBKS的比賽並不是球隊本季第一次引起爭議。本月早些時候，在主場對陣班加羅爾皇家挑戰者隊（RCB）的比賽中，爆發了一場拋硬幣爭議。

In that incident, MI captain Hardik Pandya flipped the coin high, and it landed behind him. Match referee Javagal Srinath picked it up and declared MI the toss winners. However, social media videos emerged suggesting Srinath had turned the coin over, leading to accusations of bias towards MI. Closer examination revealed an optical illusion caused by a glint of light, exonerating Srinath.

在那次事件中，MI隊長哈迪克·潘迪亞(Hardik Pandya)將硬幣拋高，硬幣落在了他身後。比賽裁判 Javagal Srinath 撿起球並宣布 MI 為擲球獲勝者。然而，社群媒體影片顯示斯里納特已經翻轉了硬幣，導致人們指責他對 MI 有偏見。更仔細的檢查發現了由閃光引起的視錯覺，證明斯里納特無罪。

In the same match, MI was accused of receiving an extra review. During the first innings, when RCB's Faf du Plessis attempted to play a wide yorker, the ball passed through to MI keeper Ishan Kishan. The umpires did not signal, but went upstairs to check the catch, revealing that du Plessis had not nicked the ball.

在同一場比賽中，MI被指責受到額外審查。在第一局中，當 RCB 的法夫·杜·普萊西斯 (Faf du Plessis) 試圖打出一個外接手時，球傳給了 MI 門將伊尚·基尚 (Ishan Kishan)。裁判沒有示意，而是上樓檢查接球狀況，發現杜普萊西斯沒有將球擊破。

Critics argued that the decision allowed MI to review the call despite having exhausted their player reviews.

批評者認為，儘管他們已經用盡了球員審查，但這項決定仍允許 MI 審查電話會議。

Umpiring Scrutiny Increases

裁判審查力道加大

The controversies surrounding MI have prompted increased scrutiny of umpiring decisions throughout the IPL. Broadcast cameras have been zooming in on the coin toss to ensure fairness, and umpires have been more cautious in their reviews.

圍繞 MI 的爭議促使整個 IPL 中對裁判決定的審查更加嚴格。廣播攝影機一直在放大硬幣投擲以確保公平性，裁判員的評論也更加謹慎。

Former players and commentators have expressed concern about the impact of these controversies on the integrity of the IPL. They argue that consistent and impartial umpiring is essential for maintaining the credibility of the competition.

前球員和評論員對這些爭議對 IPL 完整性的影響表示擔憂。他們認為，一致和公正的裁判對於維持比賽的可信度至關重要。

As the IPL progresses, further umpiring decisions will inevitably be subject to debate and analysis. The onus is on the umpires to ensure fairness and transparency, while teams must adhere to the rules to avoid tarnishing the sport's reputation.

隨著IPL的進展，進一步的裁判決定將不可避免地受到爭論和分析。裁判員有責任確保公平和透明度，而球隊則必須遵守規則，以避免玷污這項運動的聲譽。