有争议的裁判呼吁孟买印第安人的 IPL 竞选活动变得黑暗

在一场备受争议的 IPL 比赛中，孟买印第安人队 (MI) 以 9 分的优势击败旁遮普国王队 (PBKS)。尽管 MI 的总比分是 192/7，但 PBKS 仍对 Shashank Singh（41 岁）和 Ashutosh Sharma（61 岁）的反击抱有一线希望。这场比赛因裁判争议而受到破坏，包括抛硬币争议、对 RCB 的“额外审查”以及 MI 与 PBKS 比赛中的休息区信号。

Mumbai Indians' Controversial Umpiring Calls Mar IPL 2024 Campaign

孟买印第安人队备受争议的裁判呼吁 3 月 IPL 2024 竞选活动

Maharaja Yadavindra Singh Cricket Stadium, Chandigarh, April 19, 2024

Maharaja Yadavindra Singh 板球场，昌迪加尔，2024 年 4 月 19 日

Controversy has plagued the Mumbai Indians (MI) throughout the 2024 Indian Premier League (IPL) season, with several contentious umpiring decisions raising eyebrows. The latest incident occurred during MI's match against Punjab Kings (PBKS) on Thursday, where the visitors prevailed by nine runs.

在整个 2024 年印度超级联赛 (IPL) 赛季中，争议一直困扰着孟买印地安人队 (MI)，几项有争议的裁判决定引起了人们的关注。最近的事件发生在周四 MI 对阵旁遮普国王队 (PBKS) 的比赛中，当时客队以九分优势获胜。

PBKS vs MI: Controversial Umpiring Decisions

PBKS vs MI：有争议的裁判决定

In the PBKS match, MI benefited from a dubious wide call in their favor in the third umpire's review. Additionally, television cameras captured MI dugout personnel signaling to batters in the middle to review a dismissal, which is against the rules.

在 PBKS 比赛中，MI 在第三位裁判的评审中受益于一个可疑的对他们有利的广泛判罚。此外，电视摄像机捕捉到MI休息室人员向中间的击球手发出信号以审查解雇，这是违反规则的。

The dugout signal incident mirrored a similar controversy in a recent Test match between India and Australia, where Steve Smith was denied a review after receiving a signal from the dressing room.

休息室信号事件反映了最近印度和澳大利亚之间的一场测试赛中类似的争议，史蒂夫·史密斯在收到更衣室的信号后被拒绝接受审查。

Other Controversies in MI's Season

MI赛季中的其他争议

The MI-PBKS match was not the first time the team has courted controversy this season. Earlier in the month, during their home match against Royal Challengers Bangalore (RCB), a coin toss controversy erupted.

MI-PBKS的比赛并不是球队本赛季第一次引起争议。本月早些时候，在主场对阵班加罗尔皇家挑战者队（RCB）的比赛中，爆发了一场抛硬币争议。

In that incident, MI captain Hardik Pandya flipped the coin high, and it landed behind him. Match referee Javagal Srinath picked it up and declared MI the toss winners. However, social media videos emerged suggesting Srinath had turned the coin over, leading to accusations of bias towards MI. Closer examination revealed an optical illusion caused by a glint of light, exonerating Srinath.

在那次事件中，MI队长哈迪克·潘迪亚(Hardik Pandya)将硬币抛高，硬币落在了他身后。比赛裁判 Javagal Srinath 捡起球并宣布 MI 为掷球获胜者。然而，社交媒体视频显示斯里纳特已经翻转了硬币，导致人们指责他对 MI 存在偏见。更仔细的检查发现了由闪光引起的视错觉，证明斯里纳特无罪。

In the same match, MI was accused of receiving an extra review. During the first innings, when RCB's Faf du Plessis attempted to play a wide yorker, the ball passed through to MI keeper Ishan Kishan. The umpires did not signal, but went upstairs to check the catch, revealing that du Plessis had not nicked the ball.

在同一场比赛中，MI被指责受到额外审查。在第一局中，当 RCB 的法夫·杜·普莱西斯 (Faf du Plessis) 试图打出一个外接手时，球传给了 MI 门将伊尚·基尚 (Ishan Kishan)。裁判没有示意，而是上楼检查接球情况，发现杜普莱西斯没有将球击破。

Critics argued that the decision allowed MI to review the call despite having exhausted their player reviews.

批评者认为，尽管他们已经用尽了球员审查，但这一决定仍允许 MI 审查电话会议。

Umpiring Scrutiny Increases

裁判审查力度加大

The controversies surrounding MI have prompted increased scrutiny of umpiring decisions throughout the IPL. Broadcast cameras have been zooming in on the coin toss to ensure fairness, and umpires have been more cautious in their reviews.

围绕 MI 的争议促使整个 IPL 中对裁判决定的审查更加严格。广播摄像机一直在放大硬币投掷以确保公平性，裁判员的评论也更加谨慎。

Former players and commentators have expressed concern about the impact of these controversies on the integrity of the IPL. They argue that consistent and impartial umpiring is essential for maintaining the credibility of the competition.

前球员和评论员对这些争议对 IPL 完整性的影响表示担忧。他们认为，一致和公正的裁判对于维持比赛的可信度至关重要。

As the IPL progresses, further umpiring decisions will inevitably be subject to debate and analysis. The onus is on the umpires to ensure fairness and transparency, while teams must adhere to the rules to avoid tarnishing the sport's reputation.

随着IPL的进展，进一步的裁判决定将不可避免地受到争论和分析。裁判员有责任确保公平和透明度，而球队则必须遵守规则，以避免玷污这项运动的声誉。