Tron 基金会在具有里程碑意义的诉讼中挑战 SEC 的管辖权

Tron 基金会寻求驳回美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 提起的诉讼，称 SEC 对 Tron (TRX) 和 BitTorrent (BTT) 代币涉嫌未经注册的证券发行缺乏管辖权。 Tron 辩称，这些代币仅在海外销售，并采取了避开美国市场的措施，并且 SEC 试图将美国证券法适用于主要在美国境外进行的活动，这构成了越权行为。

Tron Foundation Challenges SEC Jurisdiction in Landmark Lawsuit

Tron 基金会在具有里程碑意义的诉讼中挑战 SEC 的管辖权

In a pivotal development in the ongoing legal battle between the Tron Foundation and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Tron has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, escalating the dispute over unregistered securities offerings involving Tron (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT) tokens.

Tron 基金会与美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 之间正在进行的法律斗争取得了关键进展，Tron 已提出驳回诉讼的动议，从而使涉及 Tron (TRX) 和 BitTorrent 的未注册证券发行纠纷升级。 BTT）代币。

Tron's bold legal strategy challenges the SEC's attempt to enforce U.S. securities laws against activities conducted predominantly outside the United States. In its dismissal motion, the Tron Foundation argues that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over "foreign digital asset offerings to foreign purchasers on global platforms." This stance questions the SEC's authority to regulate transactions occurring beyond U.S. borders.

Tron 大胆的法律策略挑战了 SEC 试图针对主要在美国境外进行的活动执行美国证券法的做法。 Tron 基金会在其驳回动议中辩称，SEC 对“在全球平台上向外国买家提供外国数字资产”缺乏管辖权。这一立场质疑美国证券交易委员会监管美国境外交易的权力。

At the heart of Tron's defense lies its claim that the tokens were sold exclusively overseas, with deliberate efforts made to avoid the U.S. market. According to Tron, the SEC's lawsuit fails to demonstrate that the tokens were initially offered or sold to any U.S. residents. This argument underpins the Foundation's contention that the SEC's jurisdiction should not extend to transactions involving foreign purchasers and conducted outside U.S. borders.

Tron 辩护的核心在于其声称这些代币仅在海外销售，并刻意避开美国市场。据 Tron 称，美国证券交易委员会的诉讼未能证明这些代币最初是向任何美国居民提供或出售的。这一论点支持了基金会的论点，即美国证券交易委员会的管辖权不应扩大到涉及外国购买者并在美国境外进行的交易。

The legal saga began in March 2023 when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Justin Sun, the Tron Foundation, the BitTorrent Foundation, and Rainberry, BitTorrent's San Francisco-based parent company acquired by Tron in 2018. The SEC alleged that the sale of TRX and BTT tokens constituted unregistered securities offerings, triggering a fierce legal battle that has captivated the crypto community.

这场法律传奇始于 2023 年 3 月，当时 SEC 对孙宇晨、Tron 基金会、BitTorrent 基金会和 Rainberry（Tron 于 2018 年收购的 BitTorrent 位于旧金山的母公司）提起诉讼。SEC 声称，出售 TRX 和BTT 代币构成了未经注册的证券发行，引发了一场激烈的法律战，吸引了加密社区的关注。

Tron's motion to dismiss represents a critical juncture in the case, with the Foundation's legal strategy challenging the SEC's assertion of its jurisdictional authority. By resisting the SEC's claims, Tron seeks to protect its position and reputation while advocating for clearer regulatory boundaries in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Tron 的驳回动议代表了该案的关键时刻，基金会的法律策略挑战了 SEC 对其管辖权的主张。通过抵制 SEC 的指控，波场寻求保护其地位和声誉，同时倡导在快速发展的加密货币领域建立更清晰的监管边界。

The outcome of Tron's dismissal motion will have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. The case serves as a test case for the regulatory framework governing digital asset offerings and underscores the need for greater clarity and consistency in regulatory oversight. The resolution of the dispute between Tron and the SEC will ultimately shape the future trajectory of regulatory compliance and innovation within the crypto ecosystem.

Tron 解雇动议的结果将对加密货币行业产生重大影响。该案例作为管理数字资产产品的监管框架的测试案例，并强调需要提高监管的清晰度和一致性。 Tron 与 SEC 之间争端的解决最终将塑造加密生态系统内监管合规和创新的未来轨迹。

As the legal proceedings continue, the broader implications of the case extend beyond the immediate parties involved. The SEC's pursuit of Tron has ignited a wider debate about the appropriate regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies, highlighting the need for collaboration and a balanced approach between innovation and investor protection.

随着法律诉讼的继续，该案的更广泛影响超出了直接涉及的各方。美国证券交易委员会对 Tron 的追捕引发了关于加密货币适当监管方法的更广泛辩论，凸显了创新和投资者保护之间合作和平衡方法的必要性。

The Tron Foundation's legal challenge serves as a reminder of the complexities and evolving nature of cryptocurrency regulation. As the industry matures, the boundaries of regulatory authority will continue to be tested, and the outcome of this case will provide valuable insights into the future landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.

Tron 基金会的法律挑战提醒人们加密货币监管的复杂性和不断发展的性质。随着行业的成熟，监管机构的边界将不断受到考验，本案的结果将为加密货币监管的未来格局提供有价值的见解。