Tron 基金會在具有里程碑意義的訴訟中挑戰 SEC 的管轄權

Tron 基金會尋求駁回美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 提起的訴訟，稱 SEC 對 Tron (TRX) 和 BitTorrent (BTT) 代幣涉嫌未經註冊的證券發行缺乏管轄權。 Tron 辯稱，這些代幣僅在海外銷售，並採取了避開美國市場的措施，而 SEC 試圖將美國證券法適用於主要在美國境外進行的活動，這構成了越權行為。

Tron Foundation Challenges SEC Jurisdiction in Landmark Lawsuit

Tron 基金會在具有里程碑意義的訴訟中挑戰 SEC 的管轄權

In a pivotal development in the ongoing legal battle between the Tron Foundation and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Tron has filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit, escalating the dispute over unregistered securities offerings involving Tron (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT) tokens.

Tron 基金會與美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 之間正在進行的法律鬥爭取得了關鍵進展，Tron 已提出駁回訴訟的動議，從而使涉及 Tron (TRX) 和 BitTorrent 的未註冊證券發行糾紛升級。BTT）代幣。

Tron's bold legal strategy challenges the SEC's attempt to enforce U.S. securities laws against activities conducted predominantly outside the United States. In its dismissal motion, the Tron Foundation argues that the SEC lacks jurisdiction over "foreign digital asset offerings to foreign purchasers on global platforms." This stance questions the SEC's authority to regulate transactions occurring beyond U.S. borders.

Tron 大膽的法律策略挑戰了 SEC 試圖針對主要在美國境外進行的活動執行美國證券法的做法。 Tron 基金會在駁回動議中辯稱，SEC 對「在全球平台上向外國買家提供外國數位資產」缺乏管轄權。此立場質疑美國證券交易委員會監管美國境外交易的權力。

At the heart of Tron's defense lies its claim that the tokens were sold exclusively overseas, with deliberate efforts made to avoid the U.S. market. According to Tron, the SEC's lawsuit fails to demonstrate that the tokens were initially offered or sold to any U.S. residents. This argument underpins the Foundation's contention that the SEC's jurisdiction should not extend to transactions involving foreign purchasers and conducted outside U.S. borders.

Tron 辯護的核心在於其聲稱這些代幣僅在海外銷售，並刻意避開美國市場。據 Tron 稱，美國證券交易委員會的訴訟未能證明這些代幣最初是向任何美國居民提供或出售的。這一論點支持了基金會的論點，即美國證券交易委員會的管轄權不應擴大到涉及外國購買者並在美國境外進行的交易。

The legal saga began in March 2023 when the SEC filed a lawsuit against Justin Sun, the Tron Foundation, the BitTorrent Foundation, and Rainberry, BitTorrent's San Francisco-based parent company acquired by Tron in 2018. The SEC alleged that the sale of TRX and BTT tokens constituted unregistered securities offerings, triggering a fierce legal battle that has captivated the crypto community.

這場法律傳奇始於 2023 年 3 月，當時 SEC 對孫宇晨、Tron 基金會、BitTorrent 基金會和 Rainberry（Tron 於 2018 年收購的 BitTorrent 位於舊金山的母公司）提起訴訟。SEC 聲稱，出售 TRX 和BTT 代幣構成了未經註冊的證券發行，引發了一場激烈的法律戰，吸引了加密社群的注意。

Tron's motion to dismiss represents a critical juncture in the case, with the Foundation's legal strategy challenging the SEC's assertion of its jurisdictional authority. By resisting the SEC's claims, Tron seeks to protect its position and reputation while advocating for clearer regulatory boundaries in the rapidly evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Tron 的駁回動議代表了該案的關鍵時刻，基金會的法律策略挑戰了 SEC 對其管轄權的主張。透過抵制 SEC 的指控，波場尋求保護其地位和聲譽，同時倡導在快速發展的加密貨幣領域建立更清晰的監管邊界。

The outcome of Tron's dismissal motion will have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. The case serves as a test case for the regulatory framework governing digital asset offerings and underscores the need for greater clarity and consistency in regulatory oversight. The resolution of the dispute between Tron and the SEC will ultimately shape the future trajectory of regulatory compliance and innovation within the crypto ecosystem.

Tron 解僱動議的結果將對加密貨幣行業產生重大影響。該案例作為管理數位資產產品的監管框架的測試案例，並強調需要提高監管的清晰度和一致性。 Tron 與 SEC 之間爭端的解決最終將塑造加密生態系統內監管合規和創新的未來軌跡。

As the legal proceedings continue, the broader implications of the case extend beyond the immediate parties involved. The SEC's pursuit of Tron has ignited a wider debate about the appropriate regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies, highlighting the need for collaboration and a balanced approach between innovation and investor protection.

隨著法律訴訟的繼續，該案的更廣泛影響超出了直接涉及的各方。美國證券交易委員會對 Tron 的追捕引發了關於加密貨幣適當監管方法的更廣泛辯論，凸顯了創新和投資者保護之間合作和平衡方法的必要性。

The Tron Foundation's legal challenge serves as a reminder of the complexities and evolving nature of cryptocurrency regulation. As the industry matures, the boundaries of regulatory authority will continue to be tested, and the outcome of this case will provide valuable insights into the future landscape of cryptocurrency regulation.

Tron 基金會的法律挑戰提醒人們加密貨幣監管的複雜性和不斷發展的性質。隨著產業的成熟，監管機構的邊界將不斷受到考驗，本案的結果將為加密貨幣監管的未來格局提供有價值的見解。