德克萨斯州的一名联邦法官已对Bancor Dao作出默认判决

德克萨斯州的一名联邦法官对Bancor Dao作出了默认判决，该判决经营了分散的金融平台Bancor

A Texas federal judge has entered a default judgment against Bancor DAO after it failed to respond to a summons, according to a March 13 filing.

根据3月13日的申请，一名得克萨斯州联邦法官未能回应传票后，对Bancor Dao作出了违约判决。

Judge Robert Pitman issued the ruling after Bancor DAO did not appear to defend itself following a summons that was posted on the DAO’s forum in January 2024, according to a filing by district court clerk Philip Delvin.

根据地方法院秘书菲利普·德尔文（Philip Delvin）的一份申请，罗伯特·皮特曼（Robert Pitman）法官在Bancor Dao在2024年1月在DAO论坛上发布的传票后似乎没有为自己辩护。

“Defendant Bancor DAO has failed to answer or otherwise defend itself within the time allowed, and that plaintiffs have demonstrated that failure,” wrote Delvin.

Delvin写道：“被告施主师道在允许的时间内未能回答或以其他方式为自己辩护，原告已经证明了这一失败。”

The class action involves investors who claim they lost tens of millions of dollars due to the exchange’s failure to warn about liquidity issues during a 2022 withdrawal spike.

集体诉讼涉及投资者，他们声称他们损失了数千万美元，因为该交易所在2022年的撤回峰值期间未能警告流动性问题。

According to the plaintiffs, who filed the suit in May 2023, Bancor deceived investors about its impermanent loss protection mechanism for liquidity providers and also claimed its token was an unregistered security.

根据原告于2023年5月提起诉讼的原告，Bancor欺骗了投资者有关其对流动性提供商的无常损失保护机制，并声称其代币是未注册的安全性。

They said Bancor’s ILP operated at a deficit and tried to cover by launching a new product, v3, which promised “some of the most competitive returns anywhere […] without asking users to take on any risk.”

他们说，Bancor的ILP在赤字中运作，并试图通过推出新产品V3来掩盖，该产品承诺“在任何地方[…]的任何最具竞争力的回报，而无需要求用户承担任何风险。”

Impermanent losses occur within DeFi automated market maker models when liquidity providers deposit assets into a pool, and one of the tokens loses value against another in the pool.

当流动性提供商将资产存入池中时，在Defi自动化的做市商模型中发生无常损失，而其中一个令牌在池中对另一个的价值失去了价值。

The plaintiffs added that Bancor DAO is an “unincorporated general partnership” consisting of vBNT tokenholders and could be sued in that capacity, according to Law360.

原告补充说，Bancor Dao是由VBNT Tokenholders组成的“非法合并的一般伙伴关系”，可以以这种身份起诉。

The case was previously dismissed entirely because the protocol developers were not based in the United States, but was reopened in December.

此案以前被完全驳回，因为协议开发商不在美国，而是在12月重新开放。

The plaintiffs said that the DeFi platform “does not appear to be registered in any jurisdiction and has no physical office location, mailing address, officers, directors, or appointed agents.”

原告说，Defi平台“似乎没有在任何司法管辖区注册，并且没有实体办公室，邮寄地址，高级管理人员，董事或任命的代理商。”

Bancor is an onchain liquidity protocol that enables automated, decentralized exchange across blockchains. It has $38 million in total value locked, a figure that is down 98% since its peak in May 2021, according to DeFillama.

Bancor是一种OnChain流动性协议，可实现跨区块链的自动化，分散的交换。根据Defillama的数据，它的总价值锁定了3800万美元，自2021年5月的高峰以来，这一数字下降了98％。

The ruling follows precedent from a similar case where the Commodity Futures Trading Commission won a default judgment against Ooki DAO.

该裁决遵循类似案件的先例，商品期货贸易委员会赢得了对Ooki Dao的默认判决。

A California federal judge also ruled in November that DAOs and their governing members can be sued in cases involving unregistered securities.

加利福尼亚联邦法官还在11月裁定，在涉及未注册证券的案件中，道斯及其管理成员可以起诉。