德克薩斯州的一名聯邦法官已對Bancor Dao作出默認判決

德克薩斯州的一名聯邦法官對Bancor Dao作出了默認判決，該判決經營了分散的金融平台Bancor

A Texas federal judge has entered a default judgment against Bancor DAO after it failed to respond to a summons, according to a March 13 filing.

根據3月13日的申請，一名得克薩斯州聯邦法官未能回應傳票後，對Bancor Dao作出了違約判決。

Judge Robert Pitman issued the ruling after Bancor DAO did not appear to defend itself following a summons that was posted on the DAO’s forum in January 2024, according to a filing by district court clerk Philip Delvin.

根據地方法院秘書菲利普·德爾文（Philip Delvin）的一份申請，羅伯特·皮特曼（Robert Pitman）法官在Bancor Dao在2024年1月在DAO論壇上發布的傳票後似乎沒有為自己辯護。

“Defendant Bancor DAO has failed to answer or otherwise defend itself within the time allowed, and that plaintiffs have demonstrated that failure,” wrote Delvin.

Delvin寫道：“被告施主師道在允許的時間內未能回答或以其他方式為自己辯護，原告已經證明了這一失敗。”

The class action involves investors who claim they lost tens of millions of dollars due to the exchange’s failure to warn about liquidity issues during a 2022 withdrawal spike.

集體訴訟涉及投資者，他們聲稱他們損失了數千萬美元，因為該交易所在2022年的撤回峰值期間未能警告流動性問題。

According to the plaintiffs, who filed the suit in May 2023, Bancor deceived investors about its impermanent loss protection mechanism for liquidity providers and also claimed its token was an unregistered security.

根據原告於2023年5月提起訴訟的原告，Bancor欺騙了投資者有關其對流動性提供商的無常損失保護機制，並聲稱其代幣是未註冊的安全性。

They said Bancor’s ILP operated at a deficit and tried to cover by launching a new product, v3, which promised “some of the most competitive returns anywhere […] without asking users to take on any risk.”

他們說，Bancor的ILP在赤字中運作，並試圖通過推出新產品V3來掩蓋，該產品承諾“在任何地方[…]的任何最具競爭力的回報，而無需要求用戶承擔任何風險。”

Impermanent losses occur within DeFi automated market maker models when liquidity providers deposit assets into a pool, and one of the tokens loses value against another in the pool.

當流動性提供商將資產存入池中時，在Defi自動化的做市商模型中發生無常損失，而其中一個令牌在池中對另一個的價值失去了價值。

The plaintiffs added that Bancor DAO is an “unincorporated general partnership” consisting of vBNT tokenholders and could be sued in that capacity, according to Law360.

原告補充說，Bancor Dao是由VBNT Tokenholders組成的“非法合併的一般夥伴關係”，可以以這種身份起訴。

The case was previously dismissed entirely because the protocol developers were not based in the United States, but was reopened in December.

此案以前被完全駁回，因為協議開發商不在美國，而是在12月重新開放。

The plaintiffs said that the DeFi platform “does not appear to be registered in any jurisdiction and has no physical office location, mailing address, officers, directors, or appointed agents.”

原告說，Defi平台“似乎沒有在任何司法管轄區註冊，並且沒有實體辦公室，郵寄地址，高級管理人員，董事或任命的代理商。”

Bancor is an onchain liquidity protocol that enables automated, decentralized exchange across blockchains. It has $38 million in total value locked, a figure that is down 98% since its peak in May 2021, according to DeFillama.

Bancor是一種OnChain流動性協議，可實現跨區塊鏈的自動化，分散的交換。根據Defillama的數據，它的總價值鎖定了3800萬美元，自2021年5月的高峰以來，這一數字下降了98％。

The ruling follows precedent from a similar case where the Commodity Futures Trading Commission won a default judgment against Ooki DAO.

該裁決遵循類似案件的先例，商品期貨貿易委員會贏得了對Ooki Dao的默認判決。

A California federal judge also ruled in November that DAOs and their governing members can be sued in cases involving unregistered securities.

加利福尼亞聯邦法官還在11月裁定，在涉及未註冊證券的案件中，道斯及其管理成員可以起訴。