法官允许公司要求仲裁后 OpenSea 指控者放弃诉讼

两名指控不可替代代币市场出售未注册证券的 OpenSea 用户已放弃拟议的集体诉讼

Two OpenSea users who filed a proposed class-action lawsuit against the non-fungible token (NFT) marketplace, accusing it of selling unregistered securities, have dropped their suit after a judge allowed OpenSea to demand arbitration.

两名 OpenSea 用户对不可替代代币 (NFT) 市场提起集体诉讼，指控其出售未注册的证券，但在法官允许 OpenSea 要求仲裁后，他们放弃了诉讼。

On Nov. 7, Anthony Shnayderman and Itai Bronshtein filed a voluntary dismissal of their securities suit against Ozone Networks, which does business as OpenSea, in a Florida federal court after Judge Cecilia Altonaga allowed OpenSea to file a motion to compel the pair into arbitration in an order last month.

11 月 7 日，法官塞西莉亚·阿尔托纳加 (Cecilia Altonaga) 允许 OpenSea 提出一项动议，迫使两人在上个月的订单。

OpenSea had maintained that it would compel the two users into arbitration, claiming in an October filing that they agreed to its terms of use that state all claims would be resolved by an arbitrator — including whether the claims should be arbitrated in the first place.

OpenSea 坚称，它将迫使这两个用户进行仲裁，并在 10 月份提交的文件中声称，他们同意其使用条款，其中规定所有索赔将由仲裁员解决，包括索赔是否应该首先进行仲裁。

In the October filing, the NFT marketplace added that it “intends to promptly move to compel Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims in the agreed-upon forum,” and it would appeal any denial by a court, putting the case on pause.

在 10 月份的文件中，NFT 市场补充说，它“打算立即采取行动，迫使原告在商定的论坛上对其索赔进行仲裁”，并且将对法院的任何驳回提出上诉，从而使案件暂停。

An excerpt from OpenSea’s October argument claims users agree to resolve issues through alternative dispute resolution services provider JAMS. Source: CourtListener

OpenSea 10 月份的论点摘录声称用户同意通过替代争议解决服务提供商 JAMS 解决问题。资料来源：法庭听众

Shnayderman and Bronshtein’s lawyer, Adam Moskowitz from The Moskowitz Law Firm, told Cointelegraph they “had no choice but to dismiss the pending case.”

施奈德曼和布朗施泰因的律师、莫斯科维茨律师事务所的亚当·莫斯科维茨 (Adam Moskowitz) 告诉 Cointelegraph，他们“别无选择，只能驳回悬而未决的案件”。

He added that their “main goal” for the case was to “create a framework, whereby our experts, and their experts, could accomplish what others have not been able to do, namely, try to create a workable global marketplace for NFTs […] in light of the upcoming changing political and legislative changes.”

他补充说，他们此案的“主要目标”是“创建一个框架，使我们的专家和他们的专家能够完成其他人无法做到的事情，即尝试为 NFT 创建一个可行的全球市场 [... ] 鉴于即将发生的政治和立法变化。”

“We still think OpenSea could help, especially in supervising and monitoring NFTs traded on their own exchange, for which they directly profit,” said Moskowitz. “We will certainly continue to investigate how we can best help those victims of failed NFTs and other crypto products.”

Moskowitz 表示：“我们仍然认为 OpenSea 可以提供帮助，特别是在监督和监控在自己的交易所交易的 NFT 方面，他们可以直接从中获利。” “我们肯定会继续研究如何才能最好地帮助失败的 NFT 和其他加密产品的受害者。”

Shnayderman and Bronshtein launched the proposed suit in September, claiming the NFTs they bought on OpenSea were unregistered securities contracts in the United States and were worthless “due to their illegal nature.”

Shnayderman 和 Bronshtein 在 9 月份发起了拟议的诉讼，声称他们在 OpenSea 上购买的 NFT 是在美国未经注册的证券合约，“由于其非法性质”，毫无价值。

They argued OpenSea’s August disclosure of a Securities and Exchange Commission Wells notice — a warning the agency could bring an enforcement action — suggested “that OpenSea is in the hot seat and may be found liable for facilitating the exchange of unregistered securities.”

他们认为，OpenSea 8 月份披露的美国证券交易委员会 Wells 通知（该机构可能采取执法行动的警告）表明“OpenSea 处于困境，可能会因促进未注册证券的交易而承担责任。”

Related: OpenSea promising a comeback with new, improved platform

相关：OpenSea 承诺通过新的、改进的平台卷土重来

The suit also pointed to the SEC’s successful action against NFT projects Stoner Cats 2 and Impact Theory, where it said the NFTs were unregistered securities. They claimed the NFT market breached a user warranty that stated it “would moderate the OpenSea exchange for unregistered securities.”

该诉讼还指出，SEC 对 NFT 项目 Stoner Cats 2 和 Impact Theory 采取了成功的行动，并称 NFT 是未注册的证券。他们声称 NFT 市场违反了用户保证，该保证称“将调节 OpenSea 交易未注册证券”。

At the time, an OpenSea spokesperson refuted the allegations, called the suit “baseless,” and told Cointelegraph, “Conjuring from thin air a purported class-action lawsuit based on our disclosure of an SEC Wells notice won’t make the allegations in the complaint true.”

当时，OpenSea 的一位发言人驳斥了这些指控，称该诉讼“毫无根据”，并告诉 Cointelegraph，“根据我们披露的 SEC Wells 通知凭空想象出所谓的集体诉讼，并不会在投诉属实。”

OpenSea did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the voluntary dismissal.

OpenSea 没有立即回应对自愿解雇发表评论的请求。

Magazine: NFT Creator — ‘No matter how bad it gets, there’s a lot going on with NFTs’: 24 Hours of Art

杂志：NFT Creator——“无论情况多么糟糕，NFT 都会发生很多事情”：24 Hours of Art

Check out more articles like this

查看更多类似的文章

Hit ‘Enter’ tošn

按“Enter”键