Meta 的马克·扎克伯格可以给 DAO 上一堂治理课，就像Compound一样

为了实现去中心化自治组织的梦想，他们需要从硅谷及其多类别股票中吸取经验教训。

The recent governance "attack" on lending protocol Compound by a whale, known as Humpy, has sparked a discussion on the challenges of decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) governance. Some have attributed the attack to voter apathy, while others, like security audit firm OpenZeppelin, view it as an exploit on the governance model itself.

最近，名为 Humpy 的鲸鱼对借贷协议 Compound 进行的治理“攻击”引发了关于去中心化自治组织 (DAO) 治理挑战的讨论。一些人将这次攻击归因于选民的冷漠，而其他人，如安全审计公司 OpenZeppelin，则将其视为对治理模型本身的利用。

According to Michael Lewellen of OpenZeppelin, governance models that heavily favor token holders, without any meaningful checks on their actions, are inherently susceptible to such attacks.

OpenZeppelin 的 Michael Lewellen 表示，严重偏向代币持有者的治理模式，对他们的行为没有任何有意义的检查，本质上很容易受到此类攻击。

"It's just a matter of time," Lewellen said in an interview with CoinDesk at Devcon.

“这只是时间问题，”卢埃伦在 Devcon 上接受 CoinDesk 采访时说道。

While decentralization is a key principle in blockchain, Lewellen believes it may not be as beneficial in the context of governance.

虽然去中心化是区块链的一个关键原则，但卢埃伦认为，它在治理方面可能没有那么有益。

“Decentralization is like an objective good, but it’s not a good in governance the same way it's a good in blockchain. More voices in that discussion aren't necessarily better if a lot of those voices are not aligned with the DAO and are not informed.”

“去中心化就像一种客观的好处，但它在治理方面并不像在区块链方面那样有益。如果其中很多声音与 DAO 不一致并且不知情，那么讨论中的声音越多并不一定越好。”

Lewellen emphasizes the need for know-your-customer (KYC) initiatives in DAO governance to introduce accountability without compromising anonymity. He suggests using zero-knowledge cryptography to verify identities without revealing personal information.

Lewellen 强调 DAO 治理中需要了解你的客户 (KYC) 举措，以在不损害匿名性的情况下引入问责制。他建议使用零知识密码学来验证身份而不泄露个人信息。

"There should be a way to verify this is a real person, and they're not pretending to be others. For instance, zero-knowledge cryptography can help verify identities without exposing personal information,” Lewellen said.

“应该有一种方法来验证这是一个真实的人，并且他们不是假装是其他人。例如，零知识密码学可以帮助验证身份而不暴露个人信息，”卢埃伦说。

Such measures would also prevent actors like Humpy from creating multiple delegate profiles to manipulate governance.

此类措施还将防止像 Humpy 这样的参与者创建多个代表资料来操纵治理。

“If someone has significant governing power, they should be upfront about it,” Lewellin said. “People should have the chance to recognize exactly what sort of influence they have and have the ability to counter it if necessary.”

“如果某人拥有重要的治理权力，他们应该坦率地表达这一点，”卢埃林说。 “人们应该有机会准确地认识到他们拥有什么样的影响力，并在必要时有能力对抗它。”

Lewellen also highlights the importance of wargaming exercises to prepare for worst-case scenarios.

卢埃伦还强调了兵棋推演对于为最坏情况做好准备的重要性。

“Threat modeling for worst-case scenarios should be a standard practice,” Lewellin said. “Teams need real answers to questions like: What if a malicious actor acquires significant voting power? How do we respond on-chain?”

“最坏情况下的威胁建模应该成为一种标准做法，”卢埃林说。 “团队需要真正回答以下问题：如果恶意行为者获得了重要的投票权怎么办？我们如何在链上做出反应？”

To address the issue of voter apathy, Lewellen suggests exploring mechanisms to incentivize good participation and prioritize decision-making quality over quantity, especially when it comes to critical decisions involving user funds and protocol security.

为了解决选民冷漠的问题，卢埃伦建议探索机制来激励良好的参与，并优先考虑决策质量而不是数量，特别是在涉及用户资金和协议安全的关键决策时。

“We need to give token holders reasons to be responsible stewards of the protocol,” Lewellin said. "By rewarding participation, we can ensure that governance decisions are made by informed and engaged stakeholders.”

“我们需要让代币持有者有理由成为协议的负责任的管理者，”卢埃林说。 “通过奖励参与，我们可以确保治理决策是由知情且积极参与的利益相关者做出的。”

Ultimately, Lewellen believes that DAOs handling billions of dollars should consider structuring their governance more like Meta, with multiple classes of tokens, as opposed to the current one-token-one-vote system in DAOs.

最终，Lewellen 认为，处理数十亿美元的 DAO 应该考虑将其治理结构设计得更像 Meta，使用多种类型的代币，而不是目前 DAO 中的一代币一票制度。

“We need governance systems that reflect this reality, systems that balance decentralization with safeguards to ensure long-term sustainability,” Lewellen said.

“我们需要反映这一现实的治理体系，平衡权力下放与保障措施的体系，以确保长期可持续性，”卢埃伦说。