bitcoin
bitcoin

$93444.22 USD 

1.95%

ethereum
ethereum

$3119.65 USD 

0.06%

tether
tether

$1.00 USD 

0.04%

solana
solana

$238.22 USD 

-2.97%

bnb
bnb

$615.09 USD 

-0.38%

xrp
xrp

$1.11 USD 

0.64%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.392191 USD 

1.84%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999844 USD 

-0.01%

cardano
cardano

$0.839958 USD 

13.44%

tron
tron

$0.198707 USD 

-2.45%

shiba-inu
shiba-inu

$0.000025 USD 

-1.84%

avalanche
avalanche

$35.28 USD 

1.12%

toncoin
toncoin

$5.45 USD 

-3.07%

sui
sui

$3.77 USD 

1.17%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.87 USD 

0.63%

加密貨幣新聞文章

Meta 的馬克·祖克柏可以為 DAO 上一堂治理課,就像Compound一樣

2024/11/20 15:32

為了實現去中心化自治組織的夢想,他們需要從矽谷及其多類別股票中學習經驗教訓。

Meta 的馬克·祖克柏可以為 DAO 上一堂治理課,就像Compound一樣

The recent governance "attack" on lending protocol Compound by a whale, known as Humpy, has sparked a discussion on the challenges of decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) governance. Some have attributed the attack to voter apathy, while others, like security audit firm OpenZeppelin, view it as an exploit on the governance model itself.

最近,名為 Humpy 的鯨魚對借貸協議 Compound 進行的治理「攻擊」引發了關於去中心化自治組織 (DAO) 治理挑戰的討論。有些人將這次攻擊歸因於選民的冷漠,而其他人,如安全審計公司 OpenZeppelin,則將其視為對治理模式本身的利用。

According to Michael Lewellen of OpenZeppelin, governance models that heavily favor token holders, without any meaningful checks on their actions, are inherently susceptible to such attacks.

OpenZeppelin 的 Michael Lewellen 表示,嚴重偏向代幣持有者的治理模式,對他們的行為沒有任何有意義的檢查,本質上很容易受到此類攻擊。

"It's just a matter of time," Lewellen said in an interview with CoinDesk at Devcon.

「這只是時間問題,」盧埃倫在 Devcon 上接受 CoinDesk 採訪時說道。

While decentralization is a key principle in blockchain, Lewellen believes it may not be as beneficial in the context of governance.

雖然去中心化是區塊鏈的關鍵原則,但盧埃倫認為,它在治理方面可能沒有那麼有益。

“Decentralization is like an objective good, but it’s not a good in governance the same way it's a good in blockchain. More voices in that discussion aren't necessarily better if a lot of those voices are not aligned with the DAO and are not informed.”

「去中心化就像一種客觀的好處,但它在治理方面並不像在區塊鏈方面那樣有益。如果其中許多聲音與 DAO 不一致並且不知情,那麼討論中的聲音越多並不一定越好。

Lewellen emphasizes the need for know-your-customer (KYC) initiatives in DAO governance to introduce accountability without compromising anonymity. He suggests using zero-knowledge cryptography to verify identities without revealing personal information.

Lewellen 強調 DAO 治理中需要了解你的客戶 (KYC) 舉措,以在不損害匿名性的情況下引入問責制。他建議使用零知識密碼學來驗證身份而不洩露個人資訊。

"There should be a way to verify this is a real person, and they're not pretending to be others. For instance, zero-knowledge cryptography can help verify identities without exposing personal information,” Lewellen said.

「應該有一種方法來驗證這是一個真實的人,並且他們不是假裝是其他人。例如,零知識密碼學可以幫助驗證身份而不暴露個人信息,」盧埃倫說。

Such measures would also prevent actors like Humpy from creating multiple delegate profiles to manipulate governance.

此類措施還將防止像 Humpy 這樣的參與者創建多個代表資料來操縱治理。

“If someone has significant governing power, they should be upfront about it,” Lewellin said. “People should have the chance to recognize exactly what sort of influence they have and have the ability to counter it if necessary.”

「如果某人擁有重要的治理權力,他們應該坦率地表達這一點,」盧埃林說。 “人們應該有機會準確地認識到他們擁有什麼樣的影響力,並在必要時有能力對抗它。”

Lewellen also highlights the importance of wargaming exercises to prepare for worst-case scenarios.

盧埃倫也強調了兵棋推演對於為最壞情況做好準備的重要性。

“Threat modeling for worst-case scenarios should be a standard practice,” Lewellin said. “Teams need real answers to questions like: What if a malicious actor acquires significant voting power? How do we respond on-chain?”

「最壞情況下的威脅建模應該成為一種標準做法,」盧埃林說。 「團隊需要真正回答以下問題:如果惡意行為者獲得了重要的投票權怎麼辦?我們如何在鏈上做出反應?

To address the issue of voter apathy, Lewellen suggests exploring mechanisms to incentivize good participation and prioritize decision-making quality over quantity, especially when it comes to critical decisions involving user funds and protocol security.

為了解決選民冷漠的問題,盧埃倫建議探索機制來激勵良好的參與,並優先考慮決策品質而不是數量,特別是在涉及用戶資金和協議安全的關鍵決策時。

“We need to give token holders reasons to be responsible stewards of the protocol,” Lewellin said. "By rewarding participation, we can ensure that governance decisions are made by informed and engaged stakeholders.”

「我們需要讓代幣持有者有理由成為協議的負責任的管理者,」盧埃林說。 “透過獎勵參與,我們可以確保治理決策是由知情且積極參與的利益相關者做出的。”

Ultimately, Lewellen believes that DAOs handling billions of dollars should consider structuring their governance more like Meta, with multiple classes of tokens, as opposed to the current one-token-one-vote system in DAOs.

最終,Lewellen 認為,處理數十億美元的 DAO 應該考慮將其治理結構設計得更像 Meta,使用多種類型的代幣,而不是目前 DAO 中的一代幣一票制度。

“We need governance systems that reflect this reality, systems that balance decentralization with safeguards to ensure long-term sustainability,” Lewellen said.

「我們需要反映這一現實的治理體系,平衡權力下放與保障措施的體系,以確保長期可持續性,」盧埃倫說。

新聞來源:www.coindesk.com

免責聲明:info@kdj.com

所提供的資訊並非交易建議。 kDJ.com對任何基於本文提供的資訊進行的投資不承擔任何責任。加密貨幣波動性較大,建議您充分研究後謹慎投資!

如果您認為本網站使用的內容侵犯了您的版權,請立即聯絡我們(info@kdj.com),我們將及時刪除。

2024年11月20日 其他文章發表於