ConsenSys“引导”的零知识汇总声称是“最具创新性的 Web3 项目的所在地”，但其最大的项目是 Aave 的一个看似省力的分支

“分叉”在 DeFi 中很常见，是复制现有项目代码以进行重用以及（理想情况下）进一步开发的做法。

Decentralized finance (DeFi) is littered with ‘forks,’ but rarely do they top the total value locked (TVL) charts. However, Linea, the zero-knowledge rollup ‘bootstrapped’ by Consensys, claims to be ‘home to the most innovative web3 projects.’ But the largest project, ZeroLend, is a seemingly low-effort fork of Aave, the widely-established lending protocol.

去中心化金融（DeFi）充斥着“分叉”，但它们很少能登上总价值锁定（TVL）排行榜的榜首。然而，由 Consensys “引导”的零知识汇总 Linea 声称自己是“最具创新性的 web3 项目的所在地”。但最大的项目 ZeroLend 是广泛建立的借贷协议 Aave 的一个看似省力的分支。

As noted by X (formerly Twitter) user @majinsayan, ZeroLend’s mobile site until very recently even redirected to Aave’s own FAQ section.

正如 X（以前的 Twitter）用户 @majinsayan 所指出的，ZeroLend 的移动网站直到最近甚至还重定向到 Aave 自己的常见问题解答部分。

The biggest protocol on linea (consensys) is a copy-paste aave-fork that forgot to change hotlinks of documentation which still links to aave docsethereum people should shut the fuck up for 30 days and look at the bullshit they're peddling to the worldgo keep a clean house pic.twitter.com/MibgMXppuo

linea（consensys）上最大的协议是一个复制粘贴 aave-fork，它忘记更改仍然链接到 aave docsethereum 的文档热链接，人们应该闭嘴 30 天，看看他们向全世界兜售的废话。保持房子干净 pic.twitter.com/MibgMXppuo

At $235 million TVL, ZeroLend accounts for over a third of the blockchain’s entire $667 million TVL, according to data from DeFiLlama.

根据 DeFiLlama 的数据，ZeroLend 的总锁定锁仓量为 2.35 亿美元，占区块链 6.67 亿美元总锁定锁仓量的三分之一以上。

Forking is the practice of copying an existing project’s code for reuse and, ideally, further development. It is common in DeFi.

分叉是复制现有项目代码以供重用以及理想情况下进一步开发的做法。这在 DeFi 中很常见。

Oft-forked Aave is the biggest protocol in DeFi — ignoring Lido and Eigenlayer which offer ETH staking and re-staking, respectively — with $11.6 billion of TVL across 12 chains.

经常分叉的 Aave 是 DeFi 中最大的协议（忽略分别提供 ETH 质押和重新质押的 Lido 和 Eigenlayer），在 12 条链上拥有 116 亿美元的 TVL。

Many forks of Aave, and similar lending protocol Compound, have been deployed over the years, and have often fallen victim to hackers. Recent examples include Radiant Capital, which lost $4.5 million in January, and Michael Patryn’s UwU Lend, which was hacked for $20 million one month ago.

Aave 的许多分叉以及类似的借贷协议Compound 已经部署多年，并且经常成为黑客的受害者。最近的例子包括Radiant Capital，该公司在1月份损失了450万美元，而Michael Patryn的UwU Lend则在一个月前被黑客攻击损失了2000万美元。

Today's hack on @RDNTCapital results in the loss of 1.9k eth (~$4.5m). The root cause is not new: It basically exploits a time window when a new market is activated in a lending market (forked from the popular Compound/Aave). The exploitation also relies on a known rounding… https://t.co/XogWUVO3po pic.twitter.com/x5X9ql8AGA

今天对 @RDNTCapital 的黑客攻击导致 1900 个 eth（约合 450 万美元）的损失。根本原因并不新鲜：它基本上利用了借贷市场（从流行的Compound/Aave 分叉）中激活新市场的时间窗口。该利用还依赖于已知的舍入… https://t.co/XogWUVO3po pic.twitter.com/x5X9ql8AGA

Read more: Sifu’s UwU Lend reportedly hacked for $20M, Curve’s Egorov among affected

阅读更多： 据报道 Sifu 的 UwU Lend 被黑客攻击价值 2000 万美元，Curve 的 Egorov 也受到影响

However, the original codebases are widely considered amongst the most secure in the sector, with any changes only possible via decentralized governance and on-chain voting.

然而，原始代码库被广泛认为是该领域最安全的代码库，任何更改都只能通过去中心化治理和链上投票来实现。

While this may be comforting for even the most risk-averse crypto users, such as addresses labeled as the US government, it’s not without its own problems, given that any bug fixes take time to implement.

虽然这可能会让最厌恶风险的加密用户（例如标记为美国政府的地址）感到安慰，但考虑到任何错误修复都需要时间来实施，它本身也存在问题。

US gov has 20M of stables in Aave? pic.twitter.com/KlSqssX1ra

美国政府在 Aave 拥有 2000 万个马厩？ pic.twitter.com/KlSqssX1ra

Read more: Compound Finance upgrade bug freezes $830M in crypto

了解更多：Compound Finance 升级错误冻结了 8.3 亿美元的加密货币

Back in March, Aave governance delegate Marc Zeller described ZeroLend as “the Aave codebase with a high inflation shitcoin slapped on top.”

早在 3 月份，Aave 治理代表 Marc Zeller 将 ZeroLend 描述为“在 Aave 代码库之上加上了高通胀的垃圾币”。

The comment came in response to ZeroLend’s governance forum post suggesting that Aave recognize them as a ‘friendly fork,’ offering to share revenue and a portion of their ZERO token airdrop in return.

该评论是对 ZeroLend 治理论坛帖子的回应，该帖子建议 Aave 将其视为“友好分叉”，并提出分享收入和部分 ZERO 代币空投作为回报。

Zeller didn’t seem keen on the reputation risk involved in associating Aave with one of the many unsanctioned spin-offs, however, hazarding that ZeroL🧃lend “only has one likely outcome, onboarding the wrong collateral or Oracle, or pushing a wrong config and getting featured in Rekt News.”

然而，Zeller 似乎并不热衷于将 Aave 与众多未经批准的衍生产品之一联系起来所带来的声誉风险，他担心 ZeroL🧃lend“只有一种可能的结果，加入错误的抵押品或 Oracle，或者推送错误的配置并出现在 Rekt News 中。”

ZeroLend had been seeking a similar setup to MakerDAO’s SparkLend, which has been endorsed by Aave under a similar revenue sharing proposal since it passed in March 2023.

ZeroLend 一直在寻求与 MakerDAO 的 SparkLend 类似的设置，自 2023 年 3 月通过以来，该设置已根据类似的收入分享提案得到了 Aave 的认可。

However, Spark also found itself on Zeller’s radar last week. He accused MakerDAO of ‘creative accounting,’ leading to a revenue share calculation at “much closer to 1%,” rather than the agreed upon 10%.

然而，Spark 上周也引起了 Zeller 的关注。他指责 MakerDAO 的“创造性会计”，导致收入份额计算“非常接近 1%”，而不是商定的 10%。

Zeller is no stranger to inter-DAO controversy, hitting out at Gauntlet and Morpho earlier this year, and criticizing the same pair’s risk management strategy in the wake of Renzo’s ezETH depeg. He then branded as “reckless” MakerDAO’s decision to onboard Ethena’s ‘synthetic dollar’ as collateral.

Zeller 对 DAO 间的争议并不陌生，他在今年早些时候猛烈抨击了 Gauntlet 和 Morpho，并在 Renzo 的 ezETH 脱钩之后批评了同一对的风险管理策略。随后，他将 MakerDAO 使用 Ethena 的“合成美元”作为抵押品的决定称为“鲁莽”。

Got a tip? Send us an email or ProtonMail. For more informed news, follow us on X, Instagram, Bluesky, and Google News, or

有小费吗？给我们发送电子邮件或 ProtonMail。欲了解更多消息灵通的新闻，请在 X、Instagram、Bluesky 和 ​​Google News 上关注我们，或者