加密货币交易所涟漪要求SEC专注于为加密公司设定明确的监管指南

根据Ripple的说法，过去委员会的行动对加密货币行业造成了困惑，因为该机构执行未写入法律的标准。

Crypto exchange Ripple has asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to focus on setting clear regulatory guidance for crypto companies and abandon past enforcement strategies.

加密货币交易所瑞普尔（Crypto Exchange Ripple）已要求美国证券交易委员会（SEC）专注于为加密公司设定明确的监管指南，并放弃过去的执法策略。

In its response to the SEC's request for information (RFI), Ripple urged the commission to prioritize providing law-first clarity for crypto companies, diverging from the previous administration's actions, which, according to Ripple, only generated confusion and went against the goal of the SEC's Crypto Task Force.

在对SEC的信息请求（RFI）的回应时，Ripple敦促委员会优先考虑为加密货币公司提供法律优先的清晰度，这与前任政府的行动不同，根据Ripple的说法，这仅引起了混乱，并违背了SEC Crypto工作队的目标。

The task force aimed to establish clear criteria for determining whether an asset qualifies as a security or is part of an investment contract.

该工作组旨在建立明确的标准，以确定资产是否符合担保或是投资合同的一部分。

"The past administration's actions created confusion for the crypto industry, as the agency enforced standards that were not written into law," Ripple said in a statement.

Ripple在一份声明中说：“过去的政府行动对加密货币行业造成了困惑，因为该机构执行未写入法律的标准。”

"Those actions were also inconsistent with the goal of the SEC's own "Crypto Task Force to "set forth clear criteria for determining which assets are covered by Section 7 of the Securities Act and which assets are covered by the Section 3 unclaimed property provisions."

“这些行动也与美国证券交易委员会自己的“加密特遣部队”的目标不一致，以“确定确定哪些资产的明确标准由《美国证券法》第7条涵盖，以及第3节无人认领的财产规定涵盖了哪些资产”。

However, the SEC does not have jurisdiction over most digital assets and their transactions to date, and it can only regulate "securities" and their transactions as defined by the Securities Act, the company noted.

但是，迄今为止，SEC对大多数数字资产及其交易没有管辖权，并且只能规范“证券”及其交易，按照《证券法》的定义。

"Congress has not delegated to the SEC the authority to create new categories of "unclaimed property" or to regulate "crypto assets" in the abstract," Ripple said.

Ripple说：“国会尚未授予SEC创建新类别的“无人认领财产”或摘要规范“加密资产”的权力。”

Moreover, the crypto firm argued that staking and yield on public networks differ from securities and asked them to clarify the policies.

此外，这家加密货币公司认为，在公共网络上的积分和产量与证券不同，并要求他们澄清政策。

"We urge the SEC to provide clear guidance on the types of DeFi programs and activities that would and would not be consistent with Section 3 of the Securities Act," Ripple said.

Ripple说：“我们敦促SEC对DEFI计划和活动的类型提供明确的指导，这些计划和活动将与将与《证券法》第3条一致。”

Additionally, the company reaffirmed its backing for safe harbor provisions and regulatory sandboxes, an approach that has worked well in the UK, Switzerland, and Singapore.

此外，该公司重申了对安全港的规定和监管沙箱的支持，这种方法在英国，瑞士和新加坡运行良好。

The exchange believes the Token Safe Harbor Proposal could allow blockchain projects to grow without being too quickly tagged as securities.

交易所认为，令牌安全港的提案可以使区块链项目的增长而不会被标记为证券。

"We urge the SEC to adopt the Token Safe Harbor Proposal or similar proposals that would provide a limited exemption from registration for new tokens and a broad exemption for use of the tokens in a manner that does not constitute an offer or sale of a security," Ripple said.

Ripple说：“我们敦促美国证券交易委员会采用代币的安全港提案或类似的建议，这些提案将以不构成要约或出售担保的方式提供有限的新代币注册和广泛使用代币的豁免。”

However, Ripple accused the SEC of distorting some of the legal requirements for exchanges, including the application of the Howey Test. The crypto company claimed that the agency misused the test to classify digital assets as securities, even without binding agreements or profit participation requirements.

但是，Ripple指责SEC扭曲了交流的某些法律要求，包括应用Howey测试。该加密公司声称，即使没有约束力协议或利润参与要求，该机构也滥用该测试将数字资产归类为证券。

"The SEC has misused the Howey Test to classify digital assets as securities without the presence of a common enterprise or any binding agreements for profit sharing, as required by Supreme Court and federal court cases," Ripple said.

Ripple说：“根据最高法院和联邦法院案件的要求，SEC已滥用Howey测试，以将数字资产归类为证券，或者在没有共同企业或任何具有利润分享的约束性协议上，”

According to Ripple, this approach only created uncertainty and hindered blockchain projects from launching or expanding in the U.S.

根据Ripple的说法，这种方法只会产生不确定性和阻碍的区块链项目在美国推出或扩展

The exchange, however, agreed with the SEC's decision to categorize meme coins as non-securities, claiming it's a step toward clear regulation. Moving forward, the firm believes that all future regulation should be based on existing laws and not on arbitrarily constructed norms that could unsettle the markets.

但是，交易所同意SEC将模因硬币归类为非安全性的决定，声称这是朝着明确的法规迈出的一步。该公司认为，所有未来的法规都应基于现有法律，而不是基于任意构建的规范，这些规范可能会使市场不安。