加密貨幣交易所漣漪要求SEC專注於為加密公司設定明確的監管指南

根據Ripple的說法，過去委員會的行動對加密貨幣行業造成了困惑，因為該機構執行未寫入法律的標準。

Crypto exchange Ripple has asked the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to focus on setting clear regulatory guidance for crypto companies and abandon past enforcement strategies.

加密貨幣交易所瑞普爾（Crypto Exchange Ripple）已要求美國證券交易委員會（SEC）專注於為加密公司設定明確的監管指南，並放棄過去的執法策略。

In its response to the SEC's request for information (RFI), Ripple urged the commission to prioritize providing law-first clarity for crypto companies, diverging from the previous administration's actions, which, according to Ripple, only generated confusion and went against the goal of the SEC's Crypto Task Force.

在對SEC的信息請求（RFI）的回應時，Ripple敦促委員會優先考慮為加密貨幣公司提供法律優先的清晰度，這與前任政府的行動不同，根據Ripple的說法，這僅引起了混亂，並違背了SEC Crypto工作隊的目標。

The task force aimed to establish clear criteria for determining whether an asset qualifies as a security or is part of an investment contract.

該工作組旨在建立明確的標準，以確定資產是否符合擔保或是投資合同的一部分。

"The past administration's actions created confusion for the crypto industry, as the agency enforced standards that were not written into law," Ripple said in a statement.

Ripple在一份聲明中說：“過去的政府行動對加密貨幣行業造成了困惑，因為該機構執行未寫入法律的標準。”

"Those actions were also inconsistent with the goal of the SEC's own "Crypto Task Force to "set forth clear criteria for determining which assets are covered by Section 7 of the Securities Act and which assets are covered by the Section 3 unclaimed property provisions."

“這些行動也與美國證券交易委員會自己的“加密特遣部隊”的目標不一致，以“確定確定哪些資產的明確標準由《美國證券法》第7條涵蓋，以及第3節無人認領的財產規定涵蓋了哪些資產”。

However, the SEC does not have jurisdiction over most digital assets and their transactions to date, and it can only regulate "securities" and their transactions as defined by the Securities Act, the company noted.

但是，迄今為止，SEC對大多數數字資產及其交易沒有管轄權，它只能規範“證券”及其交易，按照《證券法》的定義。

"Congress has not delegated to the SEC the authority to create new categories of "unclaimed property" or to regulate "crypto assets" in the abstract," Ripple said.

Ripple說：“國會尚未授予SEC創建新類別的“無人認領財產”或摘要規範“加密資產”的權力。”

Moreover, the crypto firm argued that staking and yield on public networks differ from securities and asked them to clarify the policies.

此外，這家加密貨幣公司認為，在公共網絡上的積分和產量與證券不同，並要求他們澄清政策。

"We urge the SEC to provide clear guidance on the types of DeFi programs and activities that would and would not be consistent with Section 3 of the Securities Act," Ripple said.

Ripple說：“我們敦促SEC對DEFI計劃和活動的類型提供明確的指導，這些計劃和活動將與將與《證券法》第3條一致。”

Additionally, the company reaffirmed its backing for safe harbor provisions and regulatory sandboxes, an approach that has worked well in the UK, Switzerland, and Singapore.

此外，該公司重申了對安全港的規定和監管沙箱的支持，這種方法在英國，瑞士和新加坡運行良好。

The exchange believes the Token Safe Harbor Proposal could allow blockchain projects to grow without being too quickly tagged as securities.

交易所認為，令牌安全港的提案可以使區塊鏈項目的增長而不會被標記為證券。

"We urge the SEC to adopt the Token Safe Harbor Proposal or similar proposals that would provide a limited exemption from registration for new tokens and a broad exemption for use of the tokens in a manner that does not constitute an offer or sale of a security," Ripple said.

Ripple說：“我們敦促美國證券交易委員會採用代幣的安全港提案或類似的建議，這些提案將以不構成要約或出售擔保的方式提供有限的新代幣註冊和廣泛使用代幣的豁免。”

However, Ripple accused the SEC of distorting some of the legal requirements for exchanges, including the application of the Howey Test. The crypto company claimed that the agency misused the test to classify digital assets as securities, even without binding agreements or profit participation requirements.

但是，Ripple指責SEC扭曲了交流的某些法律要求，包括應用Howey測試。該加密公司聲稱，即使沒有約束力協議或利潤參與要求，該機構也濫用該測試將數字資產歸類為證券。

"The SEC has misused the Howey Test to classify digital assets as securities without the presence of a common enterprise or any binding agreements for profit sharing, as required by Supreme Court and federal court cases," Ripple said.

Ripple說：“根據最高法院和聯邦法院案件的要求，SEC已濫用Howey測試，以將數字資產歸類為證券，或者在沒有共同企業或任何具有利潤分享的約束性協議上，”

According to Ripple, this approach only created uncertainty and hindered blockchain projects from launching or expanding in the U.S.

根據Ripple的說法，這種方法只會產生不確定性和阻礙的區塊鏈項目在美國推出或擴展

The exchange, however, agreed with the SEC's decision to categorize meme coins as non-securities, claiming it's a step toward clear regulation. Moving forward, the firm believes that all future regulation should be based on existing laws and not on arbitrarily constructed norms that could unsettle the markets.

但是，交易所同意SEC將模因硬幣歸類為非安全性的決定，聲稱這是朝著明確的法規邁出的一步。該公司認為，所有未來的法規都應基於現有法律，而不是基於任意構建的規範，這些規範可能會使市場不安。