美国证券交易委员会的加密货币执法部门因以太坊 ETF 辩论而面临强烈反对

在美国关于以太坊地位和以太坊 ETF 批准的持续监管争论中，加密行业和 SEC 之间出现了激烈的对抗。 a16z Crypto 的迈尔斯·詹宁斯 (Miles Jennings) 援引 Debt Box 案，指责 SEC 的加密执法部门无能和滥用权力。作为回应，a16z Crypto 宣布将停止与雇用前 SEC 加密执法律师的律师事务所合作。 Coinbase 首席执行官布莱恩·阿姆斯特朗 (Brian Armstrong) 主张迅速批准以太坊 ETF，并主张给予与比特币 ETF 类似的待遇。然而，由于 SEC-CFTC 对以太坊分类存在分歧，不确定性依然存在，这可能会导致法律挑战以及监管机构对其他加密货币 ETF 采取谨慎态度。

Ethereum Regulatory Debate: SEC's Crypto Enforcement Division Under Fire

以太坊监管辩论：美国证券交易委员会的加密货币执法部门受到攻击

The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) crypto enforcement division has become a lightning rod for criticism from prominent figures in the cryptocurrency industry, particularly regarding the ongoing regulatory status of Ethereum (ETH) and the approval of Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States.

美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 的加密执法部门已成为加密货币行业知名人士批评的避雷针，特别是关于以太坊 (ETH) 的持续监管状况以及以太坊交易所交易基金 (ETF) 的批准。美国。

Miles Jennings' Accusations of Incompetence and Abuse of Power

迈尔斯·詹宁斯对无能和滥用权力的指控

Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z Crypto, one of the world's largest venture capital firms, has emerged as a vocal critic of the SEC's crypto enforcement division. In a scathing post on X, Jennings accused the division's lawyers of incompetence and "complicity in the ongoing abuses of power."

全球最大的风险投资公司之一 a16z Crypto 的总法律顾问迈尔斯·詹宁斯 (Miles Jennings) 已成为 SEC 加密执法部门的直言不讳的批评者。詹宁斯在 X 上发表了一篇措辞严厉的帖子，指责该部门的律师无能，并且“参与了持续滥用权力的行为”。

Jennings cited the Debt Box case as an example of the SEC's alleged misconduct. In this case, the court ruled in favor of the blockchain firm against the SEC, accusing the regulator of presenting "misleading statements and abusing power."

詹宁斯引用 Debt Box 案作为 SEC 涉嫌不当行为的一个例子。在本案中，法院做出了有利于区块链公司的裁决，指控 SEC 提出“误导性陈述和滥用权力”。

a16z Crypto's Boycott of Law Firms with Former SEC Crypto Enforcement Lawyers

a16z Crypto 与前 SEC 加密执法律师一起抵制律师事务所

In response to the alleged misconduct, Jennings announced that a16z Crypto would no longer work with law firms that hire former SEC crypto enforcement lawyers. This controversial move has drawn mixed reactions from the crypto community, with some supporting the stance while others argue that blacklisting law firms could be "punitive."

为了回应涉嫌的不当行为，Jennings 宣布 a16z Crypto 将不再与雇用前 SEC 加密执法律师的律师事务所合作。这一有争议的举动引起了加密社区的不同反应，一些人支持这一立场，而另一些人则认为将律师事务所列入黑名单可能是“惩罚性的”。

Uncertainty over Ethereum ETF Approval

以太坊 ETF 批准的不确定性

The uncertainty surrounding the approval of Ethereum ETFs in the US stems from the ongoing debate between the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on how to classify the cryptocurrency. The SEC has expressed concerns about Ethereum's potential classification as a security, while the CFTC has indicated it may view it as a commodity.

美国以太坊 ETF 批准的不确定性源于 SEC 和商品期货交易委员会 (CFTC) 之间关于如何对加密货币进行分类的持续争论。美国证券交易委员会对以太坊可能被归类为证券表示担忧，而美国商品期货交易委员会则表示可能将其视为一种商品。

Coinbase CEO Pushes for Swift Approval of Ethereum ETFs

Coinbase 首席执行官推动以太坊 ETF 的迅速批准

Coinbase founder and CEO Brian Armstrong has been a vocal advocate for the swift approval of Ethereum ETFs, arguing that they should be treated similarly to the recently approved Bitcoin ETFs. Armstrong expressed concern about the potential "politicization" within federal agencies and a "turf war" between the SEC and CFTC regarding the classification of ETH.

Coinbase 创始人兼首席执行官布莱恩·阿姆斯特朗 (Brian Armstrong) 一直大力倡导以太坊 ETF 的迅速批准，他认为以太坊 ETF 应该受到与最近批准的比特币 ETF 类似的对待。阿姆斯特朗对联邦机构内部潜在的“政治化”以及 SEC 和 CFTC 之间关于 ETH 分类的“地盘之争”表示担忧。

Legal Intervention as a Possible Resolution

法律干预作为可能的解决方案

Armstrong anticipates the possibility of court intervention, similar to the legal battle over Bitcoin ETFs, which eventually led to their approval. He emphasized the importance of fair treatment, suggesting that ETH ETFs deserve approval based on the precedent set by Bitcoin ETFs.

阿姆斯特朗预计法院干预的可能性，类似于比特币 ETF 的法律斗争，最终导致了它们的批准。他强调了公平对待的重要性，并表示 ETH ETF 应该根据比特币 ETF 的先例获得批准。

Regulatory Cautions and Long-Term Uncertainty

监管警告和长期不确定性

As the debate continues, regulators may be cautious to avoid setting a precedent for easier approval of other cryptocurrency ETFs. While court intervention could potentially speed up the approval process, it could also create uncertainty in the long run as the legal landscape of cryptocurrency continues to develop.

随着争论的继续，监管机构可能会谨慎行事，以避免开创更容易批准其他加密货币 ETF 的先例。虽然法院干预可能会加快审批流程，但从长远来看，随着加密货币法律环境的不断发展，它也可能会带来不确定性。

Conclusion

结论

The ongoing debate over the regulatory status of Ethereum and the approval of Ethereum ETFs in the US has highlighted the tensions between the cryptocurrency industry and the SEC's crypto enforcement division. Accusations of incompetence and abuse of power, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding Ethereum's classification, have cast a shadow over the regulatory landscape for digital assets. While the path towards ETH ETFs remains unclear, the possibility of legal intervention and the need for fair treatment will continue to shape the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

关于以太坊监管地位和美国以太坊 ETF 批准的持续争论凸显了加密货币行业与 SEC 加密执法部门之间的紧张关系。对无能和滥用权力的指控，加上以太坊分类的不确定性，给数字资产的监管环境蒙上了阴影。尽管 ETH ETF 的发展道路仍不明朗，但法律干预的可能性和公平对待的需要将继续塑造加密货币的监管环境。