美國證券交易委員會的加密貨幣執法部門因以太坊 ETF 辯論而面臨強烈反對

在美國關於以太坊地位和以太坊 ETF 批准的持續監管爭論中，加密行業和 SEC 之間出現了激烈的對抗。 a16z Crypto 的 Miles Jennings 引述 Debt Box 案，指責 SEC 的加密執法部門無能和濫用權力。作為回應，a16z Crypto 宣布將停止與僱用前 SEC 加密執法律師的律師事務所合作。 Coinbase 執行長 Brian Armstrong 主張迅速批准以太坊 ETF，並主張給予與比特幣 ETF 類似的待遇。然而，由於 SEC-CFTC 對以太坊分類存在分歧，不確定性仍然存在，這可能會導致法律挑戰以及監管機構對其他加密貨幣 ETF 採取謹慎態度。

Ethereum Regulatory Debate: SEC's Crypto Enforcement Division Under Fire

以太坊監管辯論：美國證券交易委員會的加密貨幣執法部門受到攻擊

The Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) crypto enforcement division has become a lightning rod for criticism from prominent figures in the cryptocurrency industry, particularly regarding the ongoing regulatory status of Ethereum (ETH) and the approval of Ethereum exchange-traded funds (ETFs) in the United States.

美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 的加密執法部門已成為加密貨幣行業知名人士批評的避雷針，特別是關於以太坊 (ETH) 的持續監管狀況以及以太坊交易所交易基金 (ETF) 的批准。美國。

Miles Jennings' Accusations of Incompetence and Abuse of Power

邁爾斯·詹寧斯對無能和濫用權力的指控

Miles Jennings, General Counsel at a16z Crypto, one of the world's largest venture capital firms, has emerged as a vocal critic of the SEC's crypto enforcement division. In a scathing post on X, Jennings accused the division's lawyers of incompetence and "complicity in the ongoing abuses of power."

全球最大的風險投資公司之一 a16z Crypto 的總法律顧問 Miles Jennings 已成為 SEC 加密執法部門的直言不諱的批評者。詹寧斯在 X 上發表了一篇措辭嚴厲的帖子，指責該部門的律師無能，並且「參與了持續濫用權力的行為」。

Jennings cited the Debt Box case as an example of the SEC's alleged misconduct. In this case, the court ruled in favor of the blockchain firm against the SEC, accusing the regulator of presenting "misleading statements and abusing power."

詹寧斯引用 Debt Box 案作為 SEC 涉嫌不當行為的一個例子。在本案中，法院做出了有利於區塊鏈公司的裁決，指控 SEC 提出「誤導性陳述和濫用權力」。

a16z Crypto's Boycott of Law Firms with Former SEC Crypto Enforcement Lawyers

a16z Crypto 與前 SEC 加密執法律師一起抵制律師事務所

In response to the alleged misconduct, Jennings announced that a16z Crypto would no longer work with law firms that hire former SEC crypto enforcement lawyers. This controversial move has drawn mixed reactions from the crypto community, with some supporting the stance while others argue that blacklisting law firms could be "punitive."

為了回應涉嫌的不當行為，Jennings 宣布 a16z Crypto 將不再與僱用前 SEC 加密執法律師的律師事務所合作。這一有爭議的舉動引起了加密社區的不同反應，有些人支持這一立場，而另一些人則認為將律師事務所列入黑名單可能是「懲罰性的」。

Uncertainty over Ethereum ETF Approval

以太坊 ETF 核准的不確定性

The uncertainty surrounding the approval of Ethereum ETFs in the US stems from the ongoing debate between the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) on how to classify the cryptocurrency. The SEC has expressed concerns about Ethereum's potential classification as a security, while the CFTC has indicated it may view it as a commodity.

美國以太坊 ETF 批准的不確定性源於 SEC 和商品期貨交易委員會 (CFTC) 之間關於如何對加密貨幣進行分類的持續爭論。美國證券交易委員會對以太坊可能被歸類為證券表示擔憂，而美國商品期貨交易委員會則表示可能將其視為一種商品。

Coinbase CEO Pushes for Swift Approval of Ethereum ETFs

Coinbase 執行長推動以太坊 ETF 的迅速批准

Coinbase founder and CEO Brian Armstrong has been a vocal advocate for the swift approval of Ethereum ETFs, arguing that they should be treated similarly to the recently approved Bitcoin ETFs. Armstrong expressed concern about the potential "politicization" within federal agencies and a "turf war" between the SEC and CFTC regarding the classification of ETH.

Coinbase 創辦人兼執行長 Brian Armstrong 一直大力倡導以太坊 ETF 的快速批准，他認為以太坊 ETF 應該受到與最近批准的比特幣 ETF 類似的對待。阿姆斯壯對聯邦機構內部潛在的「政治化」以及 SEC 和 CFTC 之間關於 ETH 分類的「地盤之爭」表示擔憂。

Legal Intervention as a Possible Resolution

法律幹預作為可能的解決方案

Armstrong anticipates the possibility of court intervention, similar to the legal battle over Bitcoin ETFs, which eventually led to their approval. He emphasized the importance of fair treatment, suggesting that ETH ETFs deserve approval based on the precedent set by Bitcoin ETFs.

阿姆斯壯預計法院幹預的可能性，類似於比特幣 ETF 的法律鬥爭，最終導致了它們的批准。他強調了公平對待的重要性，並表示 ETH ETF 應該根據比特幣 ETF 的先例獲得批准。

Regulatory Cautions and Long-Term Uncertainty

監管警告和長期不確定性

As the debate continues, regulators may be cautious to avoid setting a precedent for easier approval of other cryptocurrency ETFs. While court intervention could potentially speed up the approval process, it could also create uncertainty in the long run as the legal landscape of cryptocurrency continues to develop.

隨著爭論的繼續，監管機構可能會謹慎行事，以避免開創更容易批准其他加密貨幣 ETF 的先例。雖然法院幹預可能會加快審批流程，但從長遠來看，隨著加密貨幣法律環境的不斷發展，它也可能帶來不確定性。

Conclusion

結論

The ongoing debate over the regulatory status of Ethereum and the approval of Ethereum ETFs in the US has highlighted the tensions between the cryptocurrency industry and the SEC's crypto enforcement division. Accusations of incompetence and abuse of power, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding Ethereum's classification, have cast a shadow over the regulatory landscape for digital assets. While the path towards ETH ETFs remains unclear, the possibility of legal intervention and the need for fair treatment will continue to shape the regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies.

關於以太坊監管地位和美國以太坊 ETF 批准的持續爭論凸顯了加密貨幣行業與 SEC 加密執法部門之間的緊張關係。對無能和濫用權力的指控，加上以太坊分類的不確定性，給數位資產的監管環境蒙上了陰影。儘管 ETH ETF 的發展道路仍不明朗，但法律幹預的可能性和公平對待的需要將繼續塑造加密貨幣的監管環境。