法院对克雷格·赖特实施全球资产冻结，以确保支付律师费

在针对克雷格·赖特 (Craig Wright) 的重大法律诉讼中，英国一家法院下令在全球范围内冻结他 600 万英镑的资产。该决定旨在防止 Wright 在加密货币开放专利联盟 (COPA) 提起的案件中逃避法院征收的费用，该案件发现 Wright 声称自己是比特币创造者中本聪 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 是错误的。 COPA 对 Wright 最近的资产转移和不遵守货币指令的历史感到担忧，促使法院决定实施资产冻结，以确保支付 COPA 产生的约 670 万英镑的法律费用。

Court Imposes Worldwide Asset Freeze on Craig Wright to Safeguard Legal Fees

法院对克雷格·赖特实施全球资产冻结以保障法律费用

High Court of Justice, London (March 28, 2023) - In an unprecedented move, the UK's High Court of Justice has ordered a global freeze on the assets of controversial computer scientist Craig Wright. This action seeks to prevent Wright from transferring funds offshore and evading court-mandated costs following a groundbreaking legal battle with the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA).

伦敦高等法院（2023 年 3 月 28 日）——英国高等法院采取了史无前例的举措，下令在全球范围内冻结有争议的计算机科学家克雷格·怀特 (Craig Wright) 的资产。这一行动旨在阻止 Wright 在与加密货币开放专利联盟 (COPA) 发生开创性法律纠纷后将资金转移到海外并逃避法院规定的费用。

The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by COPA challenging Wright's claims of authorship for the seminal Bitcoin white paper and the cryptocurrency's initial software versions. Judge Mellor ruled unequivocally earlier this month that Wright is not, as he has persistently asserted, the enigmatic Bitcoin creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

该裁决源于 COPA 提起的诉讼，该诉讼质疑 Wright 对于具有开创性的比特币白皮书和加密货币初始软件版本的作者权的主张。梅勒法官本月早些时候明确裁定，赖特并不像他一直坚称的那样，是神秘的比特币创造者中本聪。

COPA's legal action raised concerns regarding Wright's recent transfer of shares from his RCJBR Holding company to DeMorgan, a Singapore-registered entity. This maneuver prompted fears that Wright intended to evade the consequences of the trial, necessitating swift judicial intervention.

COPA 的法律行动引发了对 Wright 最近将股份从其 RCJBR Holding 公司转让给新加坡注册实体 DeMorgan 的担忧。这一举动引发了人们的担忧，认为赖特试图逃避审判的后果，因此需要迅速进行司法干预。

According to a judgment published on the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund's website, COPA has incurred legal expenses estimated at approximately £6.7 million. Judge James Mellor, citing Wright's history of non-compliance with monetary directives, expressed concerns about "a very real risk of dissipation" of assets, justifying the imposition of the asset freeze.

根据比特币法律辩护基金网站上发布的判决书，COPA 已产生估计约 670 万英镑的法律费用。詹姆斯·梅勒法官援引赖特不遵守货币指令的历史，表达了对资产“非常现实的耗散风险”的担忧，证明了实施资产冻结的合理性。

Wright, a polarizing figure in the crypto community due to his unproven claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, has now been unambiguously discredited. The court found overwhelming evidence contradicting Wright's Nakamoto assertion, affirming that he is not the creator of Bitcoin. This ruling constitutes a pivotal moment in the case and casts doubt on the validity of Wright's claims, underscoring the open-source and decentralized nature of Bitcoin.

赖特是加密货币社区中一个两极分化的人物，因为他未经证实地声称自己是中本聪，现在已经毫无疑问地失去了信誉。法院发现大量证据与赖特的中本聪主张相矛盾，确认他不是比特币的创造者。这一裁决构成了此案的关键时刻，使人们对赖特的主张的有效性产生了怀疑，强调了比特币的开源和去中心化性质。

This legal proceeding has ignited a critical debate about the origins of Bitcoin and the responsibility of individuals making significant claims within the technology and cryptocurrency sectors. It also raises complex legal issues surrounding copyright, identity, and the verification of assertions in the rapidly evolving blockchain and crypto industries.

这一法律程序引发了一场关于比特币起源以及在技术和加密货币领域提出重大主张的个人责任的激烈辩论。它还引发了围绕版权、身份以及快速发展的区块链和加密行业中的断言验证的复杂法律问题。

Moreover, the ruling sets a precedent in the legal treatment of crypto's foundational documents. COPA's victory represents a triumph for the digital assets industry, reinforcing the principle of non-proprietary development of Bitcoin.

此外，该裁决开创了加密货币基础文件法律处理的先例。 COPA的胜利代表着数字资产行业的胜利，强化了比特币非专有开发的原则。

The implications of this case extend beyond its immediate participants. It underscores the legal complexities associated with cryptocurrencies and highlights the need for accountability and transparency in the industry. The global asset freeze imposed on Craig Wright serves as a warning to those who seek to exploit the anonymity and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies to evade legal obligations and evade financial responsibilities.

此案的影响超出了其直接参与者的范围。它强调了与加密货币相关的法律复杂性，并强调了行业问责制和透明度的必要性。对克雷格·赖特实施的全球资产冻结对那些试图利用加密货币的匿名性和去中心化性质来逃避法律义务和财务责任的人来说是一个警告。

This landmark ruling marks a significant step in the ongoing evolution of the crypto ecosystem, providing guidance and clarity for future legal battles and reinforcing the notion that digital assets are subject to the same laws and regulations that govern traditional financial markets.

这一具有里程碑意义的裁决标志着加密货币生态系统不断发展的重要一步，为未来的法律斗争提供了指导和明确性，并强化了数字资产受到与传统金融市场相同的法律和法规约束的观念。