法院對克雷格·賴特實施全球資產凍結，以確保支付律師費

在針對克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 的重大法律訴訟中，英國一家法院下令在全球凍結他 600 萬英鎊的資產。該決定旨在防止 Wright 在加密貨幣開放專利聯盟 (COPA) 提起的案件中逃避法院徵收的費用，該案件發現 Wright 聲稱自己是比特幣創造者中本聰 (Satoshi Nakamoto) 是錯誤的。 COPA 對 Wright 最近的資產轉移和不遵守貨幣指令的歷史感到擔憂，促使法院決定實施資產凍結，以確保支付 COPA 產生的約 670 萬英鎊的法律費用。

Court Imposes Worldwide Asset Freeze on Craig Wright to Safeguard Legal Fees

法院對克雷格·賴特實施全球資產凍結以保障法律費用

High Court of Justice, London (March 28, 2023) - In an unprecedented move, the UK's High Court of Justice has ordered a global freeze on the assets of controversial computer scientist Craig Wright. This action seeks to prevent Wright from transferring funds offshore and evading court-mandated costs following a groundbreaking legal battle with the Crypto Open Patent Alliance (COPA).

倫敦高等法院（2023 年 3 月 28 日）—英國高等法院採取了史無前例的舉措，下令在全球範圍內凍結有爭議的計算機科學家克雷格·懷特 (Craig Wright) 的資產。這項行動旨在阻止 Wright 在與加密貨幣開放專利聯盟 (COPA) 發生開創性法律糾紛後將資金轉移到海外並逃避法院規定的費用。

The ruling stems from a lawsuit filed by COPA challenging Wright's claims of authorship for the seminal Bitcoin white paper and the cryptocurrency's initial software versions. Judge Mellor ruled unequivocally earlier this month that Wright is not, as he has persistently asserted, the enigmatic Bitcoin creator, Satoshi Nakamoto.

該裁決源於 COPA 提起的訴訟，該訴訟質疑 Wright 對於具有開創性的比特幣白皮書和加密貨幣初始軟體版本的作者權的主張。梅勒法官本月稍早明確裁定，賴特並不像他一直堅稱的那樣，是神秘的比特幣創造者中本聰。

COPA's legal action raised concerns regarding Wright's recent transfer of shares from his RCJBR Holding company to DeMorgan, a Singapore-registered entity. This maneuver prompted fears that Wright intended to evade the consequences of the trial, necessitating swift judicial intervention.

COPA 的法律行動引發了對 Wright 最近將股份從其 RCJBR Holding 公司轉讓給新加坡註冊實體 DeMorgan 的擔憂。這一舉動引發了人們的擔憂，認為賴特試圖逃避審判的後果，因此需要迅速進行司法幹預。

According to a judgment published on the Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund's website, COPA has incurred legal expenses estimated at approximately £6.7 million. Judge James Mellor, citing Wright's history of non-compliance with monetary directives, expressed concerns about "a very real risk of dissipation" of assets, justifying the imposition of the asset freeze.

根據比特幣法律辯護基金網站上發布的判決書，COPA 已產生估計約 670 萬英鎊的法律費用。法官詹姆斯·梅勒引用賴特不遵守貨幣指令的歷史，表達了對資產「非常現實的耗散風險」的擔憂，證明了實施資產凍結的合理性。

Wright, a polarizing figure in the crypto community due to his unproven claims to be Satoshi Nakamoto, has now been unambiguously discredited. The court found overwhelming evidence contradicting Wright's Nakamoto assertion, affirming that he is not the creator of Bitcoin. This ruling constitutes a pivotal moment in the case and casts doubt on the validity of Wright's claims, underscoring the open-source and decentralized nature of Bitcoin.

賴特是加密貨幣社群中一個兩極分化的人物，因為他未經證實地聲稱自己是中本聰，現在已經毫無疑問地失去了信譽。法院發現大量證據與賴特的中本聰主張相矛盾，確認他不是比特幣的創造者。這項裁決構成了此案的關鍵時刻，使人們對賴特的主張的有效性產生了懷疑，強調了比特幣的開源和去中心化性質。

This legal proceeding has ignited a critical debate about the origins of Bitcoin and the responsibility of individuals making significant claims within the technology and cryptocurrency sectors. It also raises complex legal issues surrounding copyright, identity, and the verification of assertions in the rapidly evolving blockchain and crypto industries.

這個法律程序引發了一場關於比特幣起源以及在技術和加密貨幣領域提出重大主張的個人責任的激烈辯論。它也引發了圍繞版權、身份以及快速發展的區塊鏈和加密行業中的斷言驗證的複雜法律問題。

Moreover, the ruling sets a precedent in the legal treatment of crypto's foundational documents. COPA's victory represents a triumph for the digital assets industry, reinforcing the principle of non-proprietary development of Bitcoin.

此外，該裁決開創了加密貨幣基礎文件法律處理的先例。 COPA的勝利代表數位資產產業的勝利，強化了比特幣非專有開發的原則。

The implications of this case extend beyond its immediate participants. It underscores the legal complexities associated with cryptocurrencies and highlights the need for accountability and transparency in the industry. The global asset freeze imposed on Craig Wright serves as a warning to those who seek to exploit the anonymity and decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies to evade legal obligations and evade financial responsibilities.

此案的影響超出了其直接參與者的範圍。它強調了與加密貨幣相關的法律複雜性，並強調了行業問責制和透明度的必要性。對克雷格·賴特實施的全球資產凍結對那些試圖利用加密貨幣的匿名性和去中心化性質來逃避法律義務和財務責任的人來說是一個警告。

This landmark ruling marks a significant step in the ongoing evolution of the crypto ecosystem, providing guidance and clarity for future legal battles and reinforcing the notion that digital assets are subject to the same laws and regulations that govern traditional financial markets.

這項具有里程碑意義的裁決標誌著加密貨幣生態系統不斷發展的重要一步，為未來的法律鬥爭提供了指導和明確性，並強化了數位資產受到與傳統金融市場相同的法律和法規約束的觀念。