支持BNB连锁店的西兰花纪念物的社区成员感到愤怒，声称他们的项目被不公平地拒绝了

BNB连锁模因流动性支持计划于2月18日开始

Community members supporting a Broccoli memecoin on BNB Chain are outraged, claiming their project was unfairly denied victory in the network’s liquidity support program.

支持BNB连锁店的西兰花纪念物的社区成员感到愤怒，声称他们的项目在网络的流动性支持计划中被不公平地否认。

The BNB Chain Meme Liquidity Support Program, which kicked off on Feb. 18, offers $200,000 in permanent liquidity to the top-performing memecoins on the chain. But controversy erupted on day two of the competition on Feb. 19 when two memecoins — both inspired by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao’s dog Broccoli — went head-to-head.

BNB连锁模因流动性支持计划于2月18日开始，该计划为链条上表现最佳的成员提供了200,000美元的永久流动性。但是在2月19日比赛的第二天爆发了争议，当时两个成年人（两者都受到Binance创始人Changpeng Zhao的狗西兰花的启发）。

In the end, the Broccoli token ending in address “714” was declared the winner over the one ending in “F2B.” However, supporters of the F2B token say the result doesn’t add up.

最后，在地址“ 714”中结束的西兰花代币被宣布为以“ F2B”结尾的冠军。但是，F2B代币的支持者说，结果并没有加起来。

F2B Broccoli community investigation questions score

F2B西兰花社区调查问题分数

According to the official leaderboard, both tokens earned a daily score of 5.7 in a system where lower is better. Per competition rules, a tie is broken by comparing trading volume, and 714’s token had the edge in that category.

据官方排行榜称，两个令牌在较低的系统中的每日分数为5.7。根据竞争规则，通过比较交易量来打破平局，而714的令牌在该类别中具有优势。

Feb. 19 ranking for BNB Chain’s meme liquidity competition. Source: BNB Chain

2月19日，BNB Chain的模因流动性竞争的排名。来源：BNB链

But an investigation conducted by the latter’s community now questions whether the 714 Broccoli token deserved the crown.

但是，后者社区进行的调查现在质疑714西兰花代币是否应得的王室。

In a video posted by the F2B community viewing the back-end data, their “BROCCOLI” token, with a token symbol in all caps, ranked first in its calculated daily score.

在F2B社区发布的后端数据的视频中，其“西兰花”代币，所有上限都带有令牌符号，在其计算出的每日分数中排名第一。

Community members discovered their token ranked second publicly, even though it came first in back-end data. Source: F2B BROCCOLI community

社区成员发现他们的代币在后端数据中是公开排名的第二名。资料来源：F2B西兰花社区

They then move to analyze the back-end data of the 714 Broccoli token (spelled without all caps), which had a daily score of 5.700000000000001 and ranked second.

然后，他们移动以分析714西兰花代币的后端数据（没有所有帽子），该数据的每日分数为5.700000000000001，排名第二。

Rival Broccoli token ranked second in back-end data. Source: F2B BROCCOLI community

竞争对手的西兰花代币在后端数据中排名第二。资料来源：F2B西兰花社区

The F2B community also attempted to calculate the scores themselves based on the formula cited by BNB Chain in a Feb. 14 blog post, and again in a Feb. 18 X post:

F2B社区还试图根据BNB链在2月14日的博客文章中以及2月18日X帖子中引用的公式来计算自己的分数：

init_price_change_rank + market_cap_rank + acc_volume_rank

The lower the score, the better. For example, a token that ranks No. 1 in initial price change, No. 2 in market cap and No. 3 in volume would get a score of 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.

分数越低，越好。例如，一个在初始价格变化中排名第一的令牌，市场上限第2和第3号的代币将获得1 + 2 + 3 = 6的得分。

Under that rubric, F2B appeared to have a clear edge — 5.5 points compared to 714’s 5.9 points.

在该标题下，F2B似乎具有清晰的边缘 - 5.5分，而714点的5.9分。

BNB Chain claims score is legit

BNB连锁要求分数合法

In a detailed response to the community inquiry shared with Cointelegraph, BNB Chain stated that the community’s calculations relied on deprecated metrics. The actual scoring formula used by BNB Chain reflects:

在对与Cointelegraph共享的社区调查的详细回应中，BNB连锁店指出，社区的计算依赖于弃用的指标。 BNB链使用的实际评分公式反映了：

init_price_change_rank

market_cap_rank

acc_volume_rank

The community’s calculation relied on the deprecated “percent_change_24h_rank” and “volume_24h_rank.” When recalculated under the updated formula, both tokens scored 5.7 — making the official tie-breaker (volume rank) valid, according to the network. BNB Chain said the deprecated dimensions were removed on Feb. 21 to “prevent miscalculations by the community,” BNB Chain’s response stated.

社区的计算取决于未弃用的“百分比_change_24H_rank”和“ volume_24H_rank”。根据网络，在更新的公式下重新计算时，两个令牌的得分为5.7，这使得官方的打破冠军（体积等级）有效。 BNB连锁店表示，弃用的维度在2月21日被删除，以“防止社区的错误估计”。

BNB Chain says the community relied on metrics that aren’t part of the official ranking formula. Source: BNB Chain

BNB连锁店说，社区依靠不是官方排名公式的一部分的指标。来源：BNB链

BNB Chain also dismissed concerns about the overly precise 5.70000001 score, saying it was simply a result of floating-point deviations caused by the IEEE 754 standard and held no reference value for the actual score.

BNB链还驳回了对过于精确的5.700001分数的担忧，称这仅仅是IEEE 754标准造成的浮点偏差的结果，并且对实际分数没有参考值。

Despite the clarification, many in the F2B camp remain unconvinced, arguing that the rules lacked transparency and shifted mid-competition.

尽管澄清了，但F2B营地中的许多人仍然不相信，认为这些规则缺乏透明度并转移了中期。