支持BNB連鎖店的西蘭花紀念物的社區成員感到憤怒，聲稱他們的項目被不公平地拒絕了

BNB連鎖模因流動性支持計劃於2月18日開始

Community members supporting a Broccoli memecoin on BNB Chain are outraged, claiming their project was unfairly denied victory in the network’s liquidity support program.

支持BNB連鎖店的西蘭花紀念物的社區成員感到憤怒，聲稱他們的項目在網絡的流動性支持計劃中被不公平地否認。

The BNB Chain Meme Liquidity Support Program, which kicked off on Feb. 18, offers $200,000 in permanent liquidity to the top-performing memecoins on the chain. But controversy erupted on day two of the competition on Feb. 19 when two memecoins — both inspired by Binance founder Changpeng Zhao’s dog Broccoli — went head-to-head.

BNB連鎖模因流動性支持計劃於2月18日開始，該計劃為鏈條上表現最佳的成員提供了200,000美元的永久流動性。但是在2月19日比賽的第二天爆發了爭議，當時兩個成年人（兩者都受到Binance創始人Changpeng Zhao的狗西蘭花的啟發）。

In the end, the Broccoli token ending in address “714” was declared the winner over the one ending in “F2B.” However, supporters of the F2B token say the result doesn’t add up.

最後，在地址“ 714”中結束的西蘭花代幣被宣佈為以“ F2B”結尾的冠軍。但是，F2B代幣的支持者說，結果並沒有加起來。

F2B Broccoli community investigation questions score

F2B西蘭花社區調查問題分數

According to the official leaderboard, both tokens earned a daily score of 5.7 in a system where lower is better. Per competition rules, a tie is broken by comparing trading volume, and 714’s token had the edge in that category.

據官方排行榜稱，兩個令牌在較低的系統中的每日分數為5.7。根據競爭規則，通過比較交易量來打破平局，而714的令牌在該類別中具有優勢。

Feb. 19 ranking for BNB Chain’s meme liquidity competition. Source: BNB Chain

2月19日，BNB Chain的模因流動性競爭的排名。來源：BNB鏈

But an investigation conducted by the latter’s community now questions whether the 714 Broccoli token deserved the crown.

但是，後者社區進行的調查現在質疑714西蘭花代幣是否應得的王室。

In a video posted by the F2B community viewing the back-end data, their “BROCCOLI” token, with a token symbol in all caps, ranked first in its calculated daily score.

在F2B社區發布的後端數據的視頻中，其“西蘭花”代幣，所有上限都帶有令牌符號，在其計算出的每日分數中排名第一。

Community members discovered their token ranked second publicly, even though it came first in back-end data. Source: F2B BROCCOLI community

社區成員發現他們的代幣在後端數據中是公開排名的第二名。資料來源：F2B西蘭花社區

They then move to analyze the back-end data of the 714 Broccoli token (spelled without all caps), which had a daily score of 5.700000000000001 and ranked second.

然後，他們移動以分析714西蘭花代幣的後端數據（沒有所有帽子），該數據的每日分數為5.700000000000001，排名第二。

Rival Broccoli token ranked second in back-end data. Source: F2B BROCCOLI community

競爭對手的西蘭花代幣在後端數據中排名第二。資料來源：F2B西蘭花社區

The F2B community also attempted to calculate the scores themselves based on the formula cited by BNB Chain in a Feb. 14 blog post, and again in a Feb. 18 X post:

F2B社區還試圖根據BNB鏈在2月14日的博客文章中以及2月18日X帖子中引用的公式來計算自己的分數：

init_price_change_rank + market_cap_rank + acc_volume_rank

The lower the score, the better. For example, a token that ranks No. 1 in initial price change, No. 2 in market cap and No. 3 in volume would get a score of 1 + 2 + 3 = 6.

分數越低，越好。例如，一個在初始價格變化中排名第一的令牌，市場上限第2和第3號的代幣將獲得1 + 2 + 3 = 6的得分。

Under that rubric, F2B appeared to have a clear edge — 5.5 points compared to 714’s 5.9 points.

在該標題下，F2B似乎具有清晰的邊緣 - 5.5分，而714點的5.9分。

BNB Chain claims score is legit

BNB連鎖要求分數合法

In a detailed response to the community inquiry shared with Cointelegraph, BNB Chain stated that the community’s calculations relied on deprecated metrics. The actual scoring formula used by BNB Chain reflects:

在對與Cointelegraph共享的社區調查的詳細回應中，BNB連鎖店指出，社區的計算依賴於棄用的指標。 BNB鏈使用的實際評分公式反映了：

init_price_change_rank

market_cap_rank

acc_volume_rank

The community’s calculation relied on the deprecated “percent_change_24h_rank” and “volume_24h_rank.” When recalculated under the updated formula, both tokens scored 5.7 — making the official tie-breaker (volume rank) valid, according to the network. BNB Chain said the deprecated dimensions were removed on Feb. 21 to “prevent miscalculations by the community,” BNB Chain’s response stated.

社區的計算取決於未棄用的“百分比_change_24H_rank”和“ volume_24H_rank”。根據網絡，在更新的公式下重新計算時，兩個令牌的得分為5.7，這使得官方的打破冠軍（體積等級）有效。 BNB連鎖店表示，棄用的維度在2月21日被刪除，以“防止社區的錯誤估計”。

BNB Chain says the community relied on metrics that aren’t part of the official ranking formula. Source: BNB Chain

BNB連鎖店說，社區依靠不是官方排名公式的一部分的指標。來源：BNB鏈

BNB Chain also dismissed concerns about the overly precise 5.70000001 score, saying it was simply a result of floating-point deviations caused by the IEEE 754 standard and held no reference value for the actual score.

BNB鏈還駁回了對過於精確的5.700001分數的擔憂，稱這僅僅是IEEE 754標準造成的浮點偏差的結果，並且對實際分數沒有參考值。

Despite the clarification, many in the F2B camp remain unconvinced, arguing that the rules lacked transparency and shifted mid-competition.

儘管澄清了，但F2B營地中的許多人仍然不相信，認為這些規則缺乏透明度並轉移了中期。