币安依靠芒果市场的裁决来反驳美国证券交易委员会的指控

币安可以通过参考最近涉及 Mango Markets 剥削者亚伯拉罕·艾森伯格 (Abraham Eisenberg) 的案件来加强对 SEC 的防御。在这种情况下，美国政府表示稳定币 USDC 不应被视为证券，因为持有者不会期望根据其价值获得利润。币安的辩护团队认为，这种推理可能会阻止将基于 USDC 价值的 MGNO 永续币归类为证券。虽然艾森伯格案和币安目前 SEC 案件涉及不同的产品，但这一论点可能有利于其他面临证券违规行为的被告，包括 Coinbase，该公司在类似案件中被 SEC 起诉。

Binance Bolsters Defense Against SEC Allegations with Mango Markets Case Precedent

币安通过 Mango Markets 案例加强对 SEC 指控的辩护

In a strategic maneuver, Binance has invoked a recent legal precedent from the Mango Markets case to buttress its defense against ongoing allegations by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

在一项战略策略中，币安援引了 Mango Markets 案中最近的一个法律先例，以支持其针对美国证券交易委员会 (SEC) 持续指控的辩护。

On April 26, Binance and its affiliated entities filed a government document citing the case against Mango Markets exploiter Abraham Eisenberg, who was convicted by a jury on April 18. Specifically, Binance's defense team highlighted a crucial paragraph in which the US government asserted its stance on the classification of a particular stablecoin, USDC, as a security.

4 月 26 日，币安及其附属实体提交了一份政府文件，援引了 Mango Markets 剥削者亚伯拉罕·艾森伯格 (Abraham Eisenberg) 的案件，该人于 4 月 18 日被陪审团定罪。具体来说，币安的辩护团队强调了美国政府在其中表明立场的关键段落。关于特定稳定币 USDC 作为证券的分类。

"There is no factual basis for treating USDC as a security," stated Damian Williams, an attorney representing the US government. "Holders of USDC do not expect profits from the token" due to its direct correlation to the US dollar.

美国政府代表律师达米安·威廉姆斯 (Damian Williams) 表示：“将 USDC 视为证券是没有事实依据的。”由于 USDC 与美元直接相关，“USDC 持有者预计不会从该代币中获利”。

This argument effectively negated a potential exception that would have prevented the classification of MGNO Perpetuals, contracts based on the value of USDC, as a mixed swap. The government's position in the Eisenberg case proved instrumental in securing the conviction but may now provide ammunition for defendants facing similar securities violations, including Binance.

这一论点有效地否定了一个潜在的例外情况，该例外情况可能会阻止将基于 USDC 价值的 MGNO 永续合约分类为混合掉期。事实证明，政府在艾森伯格案中的立场有助于确保定罪，但现在可能为面临类似证券违规行为的被告（包括币安）提供弹药。

However, the relevance of the Mango Markets case in Binance's defense is not without its limitations. The SEC has accused Binance of multiple securities violations, with each case centering on distinct offerings. Moreover, the recent filing pertains solely to the SEC's civil securities suit against Binance Holdings Limited, its former CEO Changpeng Zhao, and associated companies. It does not extend to the criminal case in which Zhao has pleaded guilty and awaits sentencing.

然而，Mango Markets 案在币安辩护中的相关性并非没有局限性。美国证券交易委员会指控币安存在多项证券违规行为，每起案件都集中在不同的产品上。此外，最近的文件仅涉及美国证券交易委员会针对币安控股有限公司、其前首席执行官赵长鹏及其关联公司提起的民事证券诉讼。这并不涉及赵已认罪并等待宣判的刑事案件。

Despite these limitations, the Mango Markets case could still reverberate within the broader cryptocurrency industry. The SEC initiated lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance just days apart in June 2023 and has pursued actions against other exchanges, including Kraken in November 2023. The legal precedent established in the Eisenberg case may influence the outcomes of these ongoing cases.

尽管存在这些限制，Mango Markets 案仍可能在更广泛的加密货币行业内产生反响。 2023 年 6 月，美国证券交易委员会对 Coinbase 和币安发起了仅几天的诉讼，并于 2023 年 11 月对包括 Kraken 在内的其他交易所采取了行动。艾森伯格案中确立的法律先例可能会影响这些正在进行的案件的结果。

As Binance navigates the complexities of the SEC's allegations, the Mango Markets case serves as a potential lifeline in its defense strategy. While the legal battles continue to unfold, the invocation of this precedent underscores the evolving nature of cryptocurrency regulation and the potential for industry participants to leverage legal precedents to their advantage.

在币安应对 SEC 指控的复杂性时，Mango Markets 案成为其防御策略的潜在生命线。尽管法律斗争仍在继续，但这一先例的援引凸显了加密货币监管的不断演变的性质以及行业参与者利用法律先例为自己谋利的潜力。