幣安依靠芒果市場的裁決來反駁美國證券交易委員會的指控

幣安可以透過參考最近涉及 Mango Markets 剝削者亞伯拉罕·艾森伯格 (Abraham Eisenberg) 的案件來加強對 SEC 的防禦。在這種情況下，美國政府表示穩定幣 USDC 不應被視為證券，因為持有者不會期望根據其價值獲得利潤。幣安的辯護團隊認為，這種推理可能會阻止將基於 USDC 價值的 MGNO 永續幣歸類為證券。雖然艾森伯格案和幣安目前 SEC 案件涉及不同的產品，但這一論點可能有利於其他面臨證券違規行為的被告，包括 Coinbase，該公司在類似案件中被 SEC 起訴。

Binance Bolsters Defense Against SEC Allegations with Mango Markets Case Precedent

幣安透過 Mango Markets 案例加強對 SEC 指控的辯護

In a strategic maneuver, Binance has invoked a recent legal precedent from the Mango Markets case to buttress its defense against ongoing allegations by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

在一項策略策略中，幣安引用了 Mango Markets 案中最近的一個法律先例，以支持其對美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 持續指控的辯護。

On April 26, Binance and its affiliated entities filed a government document citing the case against Mango Markets exploiter Abraham Eisenberg, who was convicted by a jury on April 18. Specifically, Binance's defense team highlighted a crucial paragraph in which the US government asserted its stance on the classification of a particular stablecoin, USDC, as a security.

4 月26 日，幣安及其附屬實體提交了一份政府文件，援引了Mango Markets 剝削者亞伯拉罕·艾森伯格(Abraham Eisenberg) 的案件，該人於4 月18 日被陪審團定罪。來說，幣安的辯護團隊強調了美國政府在其中表明立場的關鍵段落。

"There is no factual basis for treating USDC as a security," stated Damian Williams, an attorney representing the US government. "Holders of USDC do not expect profits from the token" due to its direct correlation to the US dollar.

美國政府代表律師 Damian Williams 表示：“將 USDC 視為證券是沒有事實依據的。”由於 USDC 與美元直接相關，「USDC 持有者預計不會從該代幣中獲利」。

This argument effectively negated a potential exception that would have prevented the classification of MGNO Perpetuals, contracts based on the value of USDC, as a mixed swap. The government's position in the Eisenberg case proved instrumental in securing the conviction but may now provide ammunition for defendants facing similar securities violations, including Binance.

這一論點有效地否定了一個潛在的例外情況，該例外情況可能會阻止將基於 USDC 價值的 MGNO 永續合約分類為混合掉期。事實證明，政府在艾森伯格案中的立場有助於確保定罪，但現在可能為面臨類似證券違規行為的被告（包括幣安）提供彈藥。

However, the relevance of the Mango Markets case in Binance's defense is not without its limitations. The SEC has accused Binance of multiple securities violations, with each case centering on distinct offerings. Moreover, the recent filing pertains solely to the SEC's civil securities suit against Binance Holdings Limited, its former CEO Changpeng Zhao, and associated companies. It does not extend to the criminal case in which Zhao has pleaded guilty and awaits sentencing.

然而，Mango Markets 案在幣安辯護中的相關性並非沒有限制。美國證券交易委員會指控幣安存在多項證券違規行為，每起案件都集中在不同的產品上。此外，最近的文件僅涉及美國證券交易委員會針對幣安控股有限公司、其前執行長趙長鵬及其關聯公司提起的民事證券訴訟。這並不涉及趙已認罪並等待宣判的刑事案件。

Despite these limitations, the Mango Markets case could still reverberate within the broader cryptocurrency industry. The SEC initiated lawsuits against Coinbase and Binance just days apart in June 2023 and has pursued actions against other exchanges, including Kraken in November 2023. The legal precedent established in the Eisenberg case may influence the outcomes of these ongoing cases.

儘管有這些限制，Mango Markets 案仍可能在更廣泛的加密貨幣產業內產生迴響。 2023 年6 月，美國證券交易委員會對Coinbase 和幣安發起了僅幾天的訴訟，並於2023 年11 月對包括Kraken 在內的其他交易所採取了行動。先例可能會影響這些正在進行的案件的結果。

As Binance navigates the complexities of the SEC's allegations, the Mango Markets case serves as a potential lifeline in its defense strategy. While the legal battles continue to unfold, the invocation of this precedent underscores the evolving nature of cryptocurrency regulation and the potential for industry participants to leverage legal precedents to their advantage.

在幣安應對 SEC 指控的複雜性時，Mango Markets 案成為其防禦策略的潛在生命線。儘管法律鬥爭仍在繼續，但這一先例的援引凸顯了加密貨幣監管的不斷演變的性質以及行業參與者利用法律先例為自己謀利的潛力。