市值: $2.8081T 4.730%
成交额(24h): $93.3027B 32.440%
  • 市值: $2.8081T 4.730%
  • 成交额(24h): $93.3027B 32.440%
  • 恐惧与贪婪指数:
  • 市值: $2.8081T 4.730%
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
热门新闻
加密货币
话题
百科
资讯
加密话题
视频
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83486.942804 USD

0.51%

ethereum
ethereum

$1942.951501 USD

1.96%

tether
tether

$1.000040 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.311790 USD

1.03%

bnb
bnb

$615.076581 USD

-3.89%

solana
solana

$126.406699 USD

0.83%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$1.000150 USD

0.03%

cardano
cardano

$0.715061 USD

0.83%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.167881 USD

-0.10%

tron
tron

$0.229729 USD

2.10%

chainlink
chainlink

$14.028689 USD

-1.06%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.781092 USD

-0.41%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.586497 USD

1.25%

stellar
stellar

$0.277540 USD

2.47%

hedera
hedera

$0.188848 USD

0.32%

加密货币新闻

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

2025/01/14 02:13

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

Key Takeaways

Binance's effort to block a lawsuit that accuses it of illegally selling crypto assets has hit a roadblock after the US Supreme Court declined to hear its appeal, Bloomberg Law reported.

The lawsuit, filed in 2020, alleges that a group of Binance investors were not warned by the crypto exchange about the risks involved in several tokens, including ELF, EOS, and FUN, which they purchased in 2017. The investors are seeking compensation for their losses, as well as interest and legal costs.

Binance has argued that it should not be subject to US securities laws because it is not a US-based company.

A US district court initially dismissed the case in March 2022, ruling in favor of Binance's argument that US securities laws did not apply because the transactions were considered "extraterritorial" and some claims were filed too late.

But an appeals court later reversed that decision, finding that there was enough evidence to suggest that the transactions were domestic, based on the location of servers and the investors' activities within the US, according to a public document shared by Bloomberg Law.

Following the decision, Binance and its former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, appealed to the Supreme Court. They argued that the 2nd Circuit misapplied the 2010 Morrison v National Australia Bank decision by permitting liability across different stages of securities transactions and countries.

免责声明:info@kdj.com

所提供的信息并非交易建议。根据本文提供的信息进行的任何投资,kdj.com不承担任何责任。加密货币具有高波动性,强烈建议您深入研究后,谨慎投资!

如您认为本网站上使用的内容侵犯了您的版权,请立即联系我们(info@kdj.com),我们将及时删除。

2025年03月20日 发表的其他文章