Marktkapitalisierung: $3.1449T -1.320%
Volumen (24h): $82.3179B 19.460%
  • Marktkapitalisierung: $3.1449T -1.320%
  • Volumen (24h): $82.3179B 19.460%
  • Angst- und Gier-Index:
  • Marktkapitalisierung: $3.1449T -1.320%
Cryptos
Themen
Cryptospedia
Nachricht
CryptosTopics
Videos
Top News
Cryptos
Themen
Cryptospedia
Nachricht
CryptosTopics
Videos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$95948.582879 USD

-0.40%

ethereum
ethereum

$2733.981661 USD

-2.16%

xrp
xrp

$2.499032 USD

-2.66%

tether
tether

$1.000127 USD

0.01%

bnb
bnb

$644.381094 USD

-3.18%

solana
solana

$161.557113 USD

-5.85%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999977 USD

0.00%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.233287 USD

-4.70%

cardano
cardano

$0.747213 USD

-3.58%

tron
tron

$0.245310 USD

1.12%

chainlink
chainlink

$16.936759 USD

-5.38%

sui
sui

$3.363904 USD

-0.65%

avalanche
avalanche

$24.153930 USD

-5.68%

stellar
stellar

$0.322611 USD

-3.09%

litecoin
litecoin

$125.230744 USD

-1.45%

Nachrichtenartikel zu Kryptowährungen

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

Jan 14, 2025 at 02:13 am

Binance Fails to Convince US Supreme Court to Hear Its Appeal in Crypto Lawsuit

Key Takeaways

Binance's effort to block a lawsuit that accuses it of illegally selling crypto assets has hit a roadblock after the US Supreme Court declined to hear its appeal, Bloomberg Law reported.

The lawsuit, filed in 2020, alleges that a group of Binance investors were not warned by the crypto exchange about the risks involved in several tokens, including ELF, EOS, and FUN, which they purchased in 2017. The investors are seeking compensation for their losses, as well as interest and legal costs.

Binance has argued that it should not be subject to US securities laws because it is not a US-based company.

A US district court initially dismissed the case in March 2022, ruling in favor of Binance's argument that US securities laws did not apply because the transactions were considered "extraterritorial" and some claims were filed too late.

But an appeals court later reversed that decision, finding that there was enough evidence to suggest that the transactions were domestic, based on the location of servers and the investors' activities within the US, according to a public document shared by Bloomberg Law.

Following the decision, Binance and its former CEO, Changpeng Zhao, appealed to the Supreme Court. They argued that the 2nd Circuit misapplied the 2010 Morrison v National Australia Bank decision by permitting liability across different stages of securities transactions and countries.

Haftungsausschluss:info@kdj.com

Die bereitgestellten Informationen stellen keine Handelsberatung dar. kdj.com übernimmt keine Verantwortung für Investitionen, die auf der Grundlage der in diesem Artikel bereitgestellten Informationen getätigt werden. Kryptowährungen sind sehr volatil und es wird dringend empfohlen, nach gründlicher Recherche mit Vorsicht zu investieren!

Wenn Sie glauben, dass der auf dieser Website verwendete Inhalt Ihr Urheberrecht verletzt, kontaktieren Sie uns bitte umgehend (info@kdj.com) und wir werden ihn umgehend löschen.

Weitere Artikel veröffentlicht am Feb 24, 2025