$ 1.5B的Bybit Hack将朝鲜拉撒路集团变成了前15位以太坊持有人之一

最近的15亿美元的拜百比·哈克（Bybit Hack）将朝鲜拉撒路集团（Korean Lazarus Group）变成了世界上15位以太坊持有人之一。

The recent $1.5 billion Bybit hack, which turned North Korean Lazarus Group into one of the top 15 Ethereum holders in the world, has sent shockwaves through the crypto space.

最近的15亿美元的bybit hack将朝鲜拉撒路集团变成了世界上15个以太坊持有人之一，已通过加密货币空间造成了冲击波。

In a conversation with BeInCrypto, representatives from Holonym, Cartesi, and Komodo Platform discussed the implications of this breach, steps to curb similar situations in the future, and how public trust in Ethereum can be restored.

在与Beincrypto的对话中，Cartesi和Komodo平台的代表讨论了这种违规的含义，未来遏制类似情况的步骤以及如何恢复公众对以太坊的信任。

A Different Kind of Breach

另一种违规行为

The Bybit hack shook the crypto community not just because of the quantity of funds stolen but also because of the nature of the breach.

Bybit Hack震惊了加密货币社区，不仅是因为资金的数量被盗，还因为违约的本质。

While other crypto exchange breaches, like the 2014 Mt. Gox episode or the 2018 Coincheck hack, involved private keys or direct compromises of exchange wallets, Bybit’s situation was different.

尽管其他加密货币交易所违规，例如2014年的Gox情节或2018年Coincheck Hack，涉及私人钥匙或直接妥协Exchange Wallets，但Bybit的情况有所不同。

Rather than stealing private keys, the hackers manipulated the transaction signing process, indicating that it was an infrastructure-level attack. The transaction signing process was targeted instead of the asset storage itself.

黑客没有窃取私钥，而是操纵交易签名过程，这表明这是基础架构级的攻击。交易签名过程是针对目标的，而不是资产存储本身。

This detail exposed a serious security flaw. Third-party integrations become weak points even if an exchange locks down its systems.

该细节暴露了严重的安全缺陷。即使交易所锁定其系统，第三方集成也成为弱点。

Lazarus Group Among Ethereum’s Top Holders

拉撒路集团以太坊的顶级持有人

Following the monumental hack, North Korea is among the top 15 largest Ethereum holders.

遵循巨大的黑客攻击，朝鲜是最大的以太坊持有人之一。

According to on-chain data, Gemini, which previously held the 15th position, holds 369,498 ETH in its Ethereum wallet. Since Bybit hackers stole over 401,000 ETH, they now overtook Gemini in ownership.

根据链上数据，先前担任第15位的Gemini在其以太坊钱包中拥有369,498个ETH。由于Bybit Hackers偷走了超过401,000 ETH，因此他们现在超越了双子座的所有权。

The fact that an infamous group like Lazarus, responsible for several high-profile hacks in the crypto sector, now holds such an important amount of Ether raises several trust issues. While initial speculation pointed toward a weakness in Ethereum’s decentralized nature, Nanak Nihal Khalsa, Co-Founder of Holonym, discards this claim.

像Lazarus这样臭名昭著的群体负责加密领域的几个备受瞩目的黑客攻击，现在拥有如此重要的Ether，这引起了一些信任问题。尽管最初的猜测指出了以太坊的分散性质的弱点，但Holymony的联合创始人Nanak Nihal Khalsa拒绝了这一主张。

Given that Ethereum’s governance and consensus mechanisms rely on validators rather than token holders, the Lazarus Group holding such a substantial amount of ETH does not compromise the network’s overall decentralization.

鉴于以太坊的治理和共识机制依赖于验证者而不是标记持有人，因此，持有大量ETH的Lazarus集团不会损害网络的整体分散化。

“Lazarus still owns less than 1% of ETH in circulation, so I don’t see it as highly relevant beyond simple optics. While it’s a lot of ETH, they still own less than 1%. I’m not worried at all,” Khalsa told BeInCrypto.

“拉撒路在流通中仍然拥有不到1％的ETH，因此除了简单的光学器件之外，我认为它没有高度相关。尽管这是很多ETH，但他们仍然拥有不到1％的人。我一点也不担心，”卡尔萨告诉贝恩克里普托。

Kadan Stadelmann, Chief Technology Officer at Komodo Platform, agreed, emphasizing that Ethereum’s infrastructure design is the source of its weakness.

Komodo平台首席技术官Kadan Stadelmann同意，强调以太坊的基础设施设计是其弱点的根源。

“It proves a vulnerability in Ethereum’s architecture: illicit actors could expand their holdings further by targeting exchanges or DeFi protocols, and thus wield an influence over market dynamics and possibly change governance decisions in Ethereum’s off-chain processes by voting on improvement proposals. While Ethereum’s technical decentralization has not been compromised, Lazarus Group has eroded trust in Ethereum,” Stadelmann told BeInCrypto.

“这证明了以太坊建筑中的脆弱性：非法参与者可以通过瞄准交流或违规协议来进一步扩大其持股，从而对市场动态产生影响，并可能通过对以太坊链链过程中的治理决策产生影响，通过对改进建议进行投票。尽管以太坊的技术权力下放尚未受到损害，但拉撒路集团侵蚀了对以太坊的信任，” Stadelmann告诉Beincrypto。

However, while token holders cannot influence Ethereum’s consensus mechanisms, they can manipulate markets.

但是，尽管令牌持有人不能影响以太坊的共识机制，但他们可以操纵市场。

Potential Impacts and Market Manipulations

潜在的影响和市场操纵

Though the Bybit hackers have already finished laundering the stolen ETH, Stadelmann outlined a series of possible scenarios that the Lazarus Group could have carried out with the massive wealth they originally accumulated. One option is staking.

尽管Bybit Hackers已经完成了被盗ETH的洗钱，但Stadelmann概述了Lazarus集团本来可以通过他们最初积累的巨大财富进行的一系列可能场景。一种选择是占用。

“Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake security relies on honest validators and resilience of wallets, exchanges, and dApps. While the Lazarus Group’s haul doesn’t threaten the blockchain’s consensus mechanism, since their holdings are not known to be staked, it certainly raises the spectre that this could be achieved. They’re unlikely to do this, as the funds they’ve stolen have been tracked,” he explained.

“以太坊的验证证明安全依赖于诚实的验证者以及钱包，交换和DAPP的弹性。尽管Lazarus集团的运输并没有威胁区块链的共识机制，但由于他们的持有量不得被牢牢地固定，但它肯定会使人们可以实现这一目标。他们不太可能这样做，因为他们被盗的资金被追踪了。”他解释说。

Along equally unlikely lines, the Bybit hackers could cause a significant market downturn by selling their holdings altogether.

沿着同样不太可能的线路，bybit黑客可能会通过完全出售其持股，从而造成重大的市场低迷。

“Their holdings do give them an opportunity to manipulate markets, such as if they dump their holdings. This would be difficult to do since their ETH are flagged. If they try to exchange the ETH via selling, their assets could be frozen,” Stadelmann added.

“他们的持股确实使他们有机会操纵市场，例如他们抛弃了股份。这将很难做到，因为他们的ETH被标记了。如果他们试图通过销售交换ETH，那么他们的资产可能会被冷冻。” Stadelmann补充说。

What Stadelmann is most worried about looking toward the future is the impact hacks can have on Ethereum’s Layer 2 protocols.

Stadelmann最担心的是展望未来的是Hacks可能对以太坊2层协议产生影响。

“Lazarus and its partners could attempt to attack Layer 2 protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism. A censorship attack on layer 2 could undermine dApps and cause the ecosystem to move towards centralized transaction sequencers. That would underscore Ethereum’s weakness,” he said.

“拉撒路及其合作伙伴可以尝试攻击诸如仲裁和乐观之类的第2层协议。对第2层的审查攻击可能会破坏DAPP，并导致生态系统朝着集中的交易序列迈进。那将强调以太坊的弱点，”他说。

While Ethereum’s network was not compromised, Safe Wallet’s attacks underscored the vulnerabilities in the security of the greater ecosystem.

尽管以太坊的网络没有受到损害，但安全钱包的攻击突显了更大生态系统安全的漏洞。

“The breach has certainly increased tensions in the ecosystem, and created an uneven token distribution. The question remains: will Lazarus or other hacking groups associated with state actors attempt to exploit the Ethereum ecosystem, particularly at layer 2?” Stadelmann concluded.

“违规行为无疑加剧了生态系统的紧张局势，并产生了不均匀的代币分布。问题仍然存在：拉撒路或其他与国家参与者相关的黑客群体会试图利用以太坊生态系统，尤其是在第2层？” Stadelmann得出结论。

It also raised questions about the need for better security standards.

它还提出了有关需要更好安全标准的问题。

Verification Over Trust

验证信任

Khalsa argued that the Bybit hack, while not a

卡尔萨（Khalsa）辩称，bybit hack虽然不是