$ 1.5B的Bybit Hack將朝鮮拉撒路集團變成了前15位以太坊持有人之一

最近的15億美元的拜百比·哈克（Bybit Hack）將朝鮮拉撒路集團（Korean Lazarus Group）變成了世界上15位以太坊持有人之一。

The recent $1.5 billion Bybit hack, which turned North Korean Lazarus Group into one of the top 15 Ethereum holders in the world, has sent shockwaves through the crypto space.

最近的15億美元的bybit hack將朝鮮拉撒路集團變成了世界上15個以太坊持有人之一，已通過加密貨幣空間造成了衝擊波。

In a conversation with BeInCrypto, representatives from Holonym, Cartesi, and Komodo Platform discussed the implications of this breach, steps to curb similar situations in the future, and how public trust in Ethereum can be restored.

在與Beincrypto的對話中，Cartesi和Komodo平台的代表討論了這種違規的含義，未來遏制類似情況的步驟以及如何恢復公眾對以太坊的信任。

A Different Kind of Breach

另一種違規行為

The Bybit hack shook the crypto community not just because of the quantity of funds stolen but also because of the nature of the breach.

Bybit Hack震驚了加密貨幣社區，不僅是因為資金的數量被盜，還因為違約的本質。

While other crypto exchange breaches, like the 2014 Mt. Gox episode or the 2018 Coincheck hack, involved private keys or direct compromises of exchange wallets, Bybit’s situation was different.

儘管其他加密貨幣交易所違規，例如2014年的Gox情節或2018年Coincheck Hack，涉及私人鑰匙或直接妥協Exchange Wallets，但Bybit的情況有所不同。

Rather than stealing private keys, the hackers manipulated the transaction signing process, indicating that it was an infrastructure-level attack. The transaction signing process was targeted instead of the asset storage itself.

黑客沒有竊取私鑰，而是操縱交易簽名過程，這表明這是基礎架構級的攻擊。交易簽名過程是針對目標的，而不是資產存儲本身。

This detail exposed a serious security flaw. Third-party integrations become weak points even if an exchange locks down its systems.

該細節暴露了嚴重的安全缺陷。即使交易所鎖定其係統，第三方集成也成為弱點。

Lazarus Group Among Ethereum’s Top Holders

拉撒路集團以太坊的頂級持有人

Following the monumental hack, North Korea is among the top 15 largest Ethereum holders.

遵循巨大的黑客攻擊，朝鮮是最大的以太坊持有人之一。

According to on-chain data, Gemini, which previously held the 15th position, holds 369,498 ETH in its Ethereum wallet. Since Bybit hackers stole over 401,000 ETH, they now overtook Gemini in ownership.

根據鏈上數據，先前擔任第15位的Gemini在其以太坊錢包中擁有369,498個ETH。由於Bybit Hackers偷走了超過401,000 ETH，因此他們現在超越了雙子座的所有權。

The fact that an infamous group like Lazarus, responsible for several high-profile hacks in the crypto sector, now holds such an important amount of Ether raises several trust issues. While initial speculation pointed toward a weakness in Ethereum’s decentralized nature, Nanak Nihal Khalsa, Co-Founder of Holonym, discards this claim.

像Lazarus這樣臭名昭著的群體負責加密領域的幾個備受矚目的黑客攻擊，現在擁有如此重要的Ether，這引起了一些信任問題。儘管最初的猜測指出了以太坊的分散性質的弱點，但Holymony的聯合創始人Nanak Nihal Khalsa拒絕了這一主張。

Given that Ethereum’s governance and consensus mechanisms rely on validators rather than token holders, the Lazarus Group holding such a substantial amount of ETH does not compromise the network’s overall decentralization.

鑑於以太坊的治理和共識機制依賴於驗證者而不是標記持有人，因此，持有大量ETH的Lazarus集團不會損害網絡的整體分散化。

“Lazarus still owns less than 1% of ETH in circulation, so I don’t see it as highly relevant beyond simple optics. While it’s a lot of ETH, they still own less than 1%. I’m not worried at all,” Khalsa told BeInCrypto.

“拉撒路在流通中仍然擁有不到1％的ETH，因此除了簡單的光學器件之外，我認為它沒有高度相關。儘管這是很多ETH，但他們仍然擁有不到1％的人。我一點也不擔心，”卡爾薩告訴貝恩克里普托。

Kadan Stadelmann, Chief Technology Officer at Komodo Platform, agreed, emphasizing that Ethereum’s infrastructure design is the source of its weakness.

Komodo平台首席技術官Kadan Stadelmann同意，強調以太坊的基礎設施設計是其弱點的根源。

“It proves a vulnerability in Ethereum’s architecture: illicit actors could expand their holdings further by targeting exchanges or DeFi protocols, and thus wield an influence over market dynamics and possibly change governance decisions in Ethereum’s off-chain processes by voting on improvement proposals. While Ethereum’s technical decentralization has not been compromised, Lazarus Group has eroded trust in Ethereum,” Stadelmann told BeInCrypto.

“這證明了以太坊建築中的脆弱性：非法參與者可以通過瞄準交流或違規協議來進一步擴大其持股，從而對市場動態產生影響，並可能通過對以太坊鍊鍊過程中的治理決策產生影響，通過對改進建議進行投票。儘管以太坊的技術權力下放尚未受到損害，但拉撒路集團侵蝕了對以太坊的信任，” Stadelmann告訴Beincrypto。

However, while token holders cannot influence Ethereum’s consensus mechanisms, they can manipulate markets.

但是，儘管令牌持有人不能影響以太坊的共識機制，但他們可以操縱市場。

Potential Impacts and Market Manipulations

潛在的影響和市場操縱

Though the Bybit hackers have already finished laundering the stolen ETH, Stadelmann outlined a series of possible scenarios that the Lazarus Group could have carried out with the massive wealth they originally accumulated. One option is staking.

儘管Bybit Hackers已經完成了被盜ETH的洗錢，但Stadelmann概述了Lazarus集團本來可以通過他們最初積累的巨大財富進行的一系列可能場景。一種選擇是佔用。

“Ethereum’s Proof-of-Stake security relies on honest validators and resilience of wallets, exchanges, and dApps. While the Lazarus Group’s haul doesn’t threaten the blockchain’s consensus mechanism, since their holdings are not known to be staked, it certainly raises the spectre that this could be achieved. They’re unlikely to do this, as the funds they’ve stolen have been tracked,” he explained.

“以太坊的驗證證明安全依賴於誠實的驗證者以及錢包，交換和DAPP的彈性。儘管Lazarus集團的運輸並沒有威脅區塊鏈的共識機制，但由於他們的持有量不得被牢牢地固定，但它肯定會使人們可以實現這一目標。他們不太可能這樣做，因為他們被盜的資金被追踪了。”他解釋說。

Along equally unlikely lines, the Bybit hackers could cause a significant market downturn by selling their holdings altogether.

沿著同樣不太可能的線路，bybit黑客可能會通過完全出售其持股，從而造成重大的市場低迷。

“Their holdings do give them an opportunity to manipulate markets, such as if they dump their holdings. This would be difficult to do since their ETH are flagged. If they try to exchange the ETH via selling, their assets could be frozen,” Stadelmann added.

“他們的持股確實使他們有機會操縱市場，例如他們拋棄了股份。這將很難做到，因為他們的ETH被標記了。如果他們試圖通過銷售交換ETH，那麼他們的資產可能會被冷凍。” Stadelmann補充說。

What Stadelmann is most worried about looking toward the future is the impact hacks can have on Ethereum’s Layer 2 protocols.

Stadelmann最擔心的是展望未來的是Hacks可能對以太坊2層協議產生影響。

“Lazarus and its partners could attempt to attack Layer 2 protocols like Arbitrum and Optimism. A censorship attack on layer 2 could undermine dApps and cause the ecosystem to move towards centralized transaction sequencers. That would underscore Ethereum’s weakness,” he said.

“拉撒路及其合作夥伴可以嘗試攻擊諸如仲裁和樂觀之類的第2層協議。對第2層的審查攻擊可能會破壞DAPP，並導致生態系統朝著集中的交易序列邁進。那將強調以太坊的弱點，”他說。

While Ethereum’s network was not compromised, Safe Wallet’s attacks underscored the vulnerabilities in the security of the greater ecosystem.

儘管以太坊的網絡沒有受到損害，但安全錢包的攻擊突顯了更大生態系統安全的漏洞。

“The breach has certainly increased tensions in the ecosystem, and created an uneven token distribution. The question remains: will Lazarus or other hacking groups associated with state actors attempt to exploit the Ethereum ecosystem, particularly at layer 2?” Stadelmann concluded.

“違規行為無疑加劇了生態系統的緊張局勢，並產生了不均勻的代幣分佈。問題仍然存在：拉撒路或其他與國家參與者相關的黑客群體會試圖利用以太坊生態系統，尤其是在第2層？” Stadelmann得出結論。

It also raised questions about the need for better security standards.

它還提出了有關需要更好安全標準的問題。

Verification Over Trust

驗證信任

Khalsa argued that the Bybit hack, while not a

卡爾薩（Khalsa）辯稱，bybit hack雖然不是