龍捲風現金創造者反擊：羅馬風暴提出動議駁回洗錢指控

Tornado Cash 的開發商 Roman Storm 已提出動議，駁回對他的刑事起訴指控。 Storm 認為，Tornado Cash 為合法的加密貨幣用戶提供了財務隱私，並且建立該軟體不是犯罪。該動議對司法部關於 Tornado Cash 促進洗錢活動的指控提出質疑，認為 Storm 無法控制該協議，也無法阻止非法行為者使用該協議。

Tornado Cash Developer Roman Storm Files Motion to Dismiss Criminal Charges

龍捲風現金開發商羅馬風暴提出動議駁回刑事指控

In a bold legal move, Roman Storm, the developer behind the controversial Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixing service, has filed a motion to dismiss the criminal indictment against him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

備受爭議的 Tornado Cash 加密貨幣混合服務背後的開發商 Roman Storm 採取了一項大膽的法律舉措，已向美國紐約南區地方法院提出動議，駁回對他的刑事起訴。

Storm's motion, filed on Friday evening, asserts that he is a software developer who, along with his US-based company, created Tornado Cash to enhance financial privacy for legitimate cryptocurrency users, a purpose that does not constitute a crime.

Storm 於週五晚上提交的動議稱，他是一名軟體開發人員，與他的美國公司一起創建了 Tornado Cash，以增強合法加密貨幣用戶的財務隱私，這一目的並不構成犯罪。

Charges Stemming from Alleged Money Laundering

涉嫌洗錢的指控

Storm was arrested in the Netherlands last year for his involvement with Tornado Cash, which has been utilized for money laundering activities. However, his legal team maintains that he merely published code that anyone could use and that developing Tornado Cash does not equate to committing money laundering.

Storm去年因參與Tornado Cash而在荷蘭被捕，該現金已被用於洗錢活動。然而，他的法律團隊堅稱，他只是發布了任何人都可以使用的程式碼，開發 Tornado Cash 並不等於洗錢。

The US Department of Justice alleges that Tornado Cash has facilitated over $1 billion in illicit transactions by entities such as North Korea's Lazarus Group.

美國司法部聲稱，Tornado Cash 為北韓 Lazarus Group 等實體的非法交易提供了超過 10 億美元的便利。

Defining Tornado Cash: A Protocol, Not a Service

定義龍捲風現金：協議，而不是服務

In its motion, Storm's legal team provides a detailed definition of Tornado Cash, describing it as a set of non-custodial smart contracts that grant users complete ownership and control over their assets without relying on intermediaries or service providers.

Storm 的法律團隊在其動議中提供了 Tornado Cash 的詳細定義，將其描述為一套非託管智能合約，賦予用戶對其資產的完全所有權和控制權，而無需依賴中介機構或服務提供者。

The motion challenges the government's characterization of Tornado Cash as a "mixer" or "service," arguing instead that it is a decentralized protocol that operates autonomously. Furthermore, Storm's team contends that he could not have controlled the use of Tornado Cash by Lazarus and similar entities.

該動議挑戰了政府將 Tornado Cash 描述為「混合器」或「服務」的說法，認為它是一種自主運作的去中心化協議。此外，Storm 的團隊辯稱，他無法控制 Lazarus 和類似實體對 Tornado Cash 的使用。

Charges Lack Legal Basis

指控缺乏法律依據

The motion asserts that the charges against Storm are irrelevant because Tornado Cash does not meet the definition of a financial institution. Users maintain control over their funds, and the protocol is free and open-source software that does not collect any fees.

該動議聲稱，對 Storm 的指控無關緊要，因為 Tornado Cash 不符合金融機構的定義。用戶保持對其資金的控制，該協議是免費的開源軟體，不收取任何費用。

Storm's team argues that he could not have conspired to launder funds or operate as a money transmitter since there is no Tornado Cash enterprise that he could have been involved with. Additionally, the motion highlights that Storm and his fellow developers at Peppersec never conspired with alleged criminals.

Storm 的團隊辯稱，他不可能共謀洗錢或充當資金轉移者，因為他沒有可能參與任何 Tornado Cash 企業。此外，該動議強調 Storm 和他在 Peppersec 的開發同事從未與犯罪嫌疑人合謀。

Selective Enforcement and Jurisdictional Differences

選擇性執法和管轄權差異

The motion also criticizes the Department of Justice for selectively enforcing the law against Tornado Cash, while ignoring other cryptocurrency projects that may have been involved in similar activities.

該動議還批評司法部選擇性地執行針對 Tornado Cash 的法律，而忽略了其他可能參與類似活動的加密貨幣項目。

Furthermore, the motion notes that the legal framework in the Netherlands, where Storm was arrested and initially tried, differs significantly from that of the United States.

此外，該動議指出，斯托姆被捕並最初受審的荷蘭的法律框架與美國的法律框架有很大不同。

Charges Echo Those Against Alexey Pertsev

指控與針對阿列克謝·佩爾采夫的指控相呼應

The charges against Storm mirror those faced by Alexey Pertsev, another Tornado Cash developer who was arrested in August 2022. Pertsev is currently on trial in the Netherlands, also facing money laundering allegations.

針對 Storm 的指控與 2022 年 8 月被捕的另一名 Tornado Cash 開發商 Alexey Pertsev 面臨的指控相似。Pertsev 目前正在荷蘭接受審判，也面臨洗錢指控。

Motions Preceding Dismissal Request

駁回請求前的動議

Prior to filing the motion to dismiss, Storm's legal team filed two additional motions. The first seeks to compel the Department of Justice to provide any communications between US and Dutch authorities regarding Storm's case.

在提出駁回動議之前，Storm 的法律團隊又提出了兩項動議。第一項旨在迫使司法部提供美國和荷蘭當局之間有關斯托姆案件的任何通訊。

Conclusion

結論

Roman Storm's motion to dismiss charges against him presents a forceful case that his actions as a developer do not constitute criminal activity. The motion challenges the definition of Tornado Cash, the lack of evidence against Storm, and the selective enforcement of the law.

羅曼·斯托姆 (Roman Storm) 駁回對他的指控的動議提供了強有力的證據，證明他作為開發商的行為不構成犯罪活動。該動議挑戰了 Tornado Cash 的定義、缺乏針對 Storm 的證據以及選擇性執行法律。

The outcome of this case has significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency development and the boundaries of digital privacy. If Storm's motion succeeds, it could potentially set a precedent for how the legal system treats software developers and the use of privacy-enhancing technologies in the cryptocurrency realm.

此案的結果對於加密貨幣發展的未來和數位隱私的邊界具有重大影響。如果 Storm 的動議獲得成功，它可能會為法律體系如何對待軟體開發人員以及在加密貨幣領域使用隱私增強技術樹立先例。