龙卷风现金创造者反击：罗马风暴提出动议驳回洗钱指控

Tornado Cash 的开发商 Roman Storm 已提出动议，驳回对他的刑事起诉指控。 Storm 认为，Tornado Cash 为合法的加密货币用户提供了财务隐私，并且构建该软件不是犯罪。该动议对司法部关于 Tornado Cash 促进洗钱活动的指控提出质疑，认为 Storm 无法控制该协议，也无法阻止非法行为者使用该协议。

Tornado Cash Developer Roman Storm Files Motion to Dismiss Criminal Charges

龙卷风现金开发商罗马风暴提出动议驳回刑事指控

In a bold legal move, Roman Storm, the developer behind the controversial Tornado Cash cryptocurrency mixing service, has filed a motion to dismiss the criminal indictment against him in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

备受争议的 Tornado Cash 加密货币混合服务背后的开发商 Roman Storm 采取了一项大胆的法律举措，已向美国纽约南区地方法院提出动议，驳回对他的刑事起诉。

Storm's motion, filed on Friday evening, asserts that he is a software developer who, along with his US-based company, created Tornado Cash to enhance financial privacy for legitimate cryptocurrency users, a purpose that does not constitute a crime.

Storm 于周五晚上提交的动议称，他是一名软件开发人员，与他的美国公司一起创建了 Tornado Cash，以增强合法加密货币用户的财务隐私，这一目的并不构成犯罪。

Charges Stemming from Alleged Money Laundering

涉嫌洗钱的指控

Storm was arrested in the Netherlands last year for his involvement with Tornado Cash, which has been utilized for money laundering activities. However, his legal team maintains that he merely published code that anyone could use and that developing Tornado Cash does not equate to committing money laundering.

Storm去年因参与Tornado Cash而在荷兰被捕，该现金已被用于洗钱活动。然而，他的法律团队坚称，他只是发布了任何人都可以使用的代码，开发 Tornado Cash 并不等同于洗钱。

The US Department of Justice alleges that Tornado Cash has facilitated over $1 billion in illicit transactions by entities such as North Korea's Lazarus Group.

美国司法部声称，Tornado Cash 为朝鲜 Lazarus Group 等实体的非法交易提供了超过 10 亿美元的便利。

Defining Tornado Cash: A Protocol, Not a Service

定义龙卷风现金：协议，而不是服务

In its motion, Storm's legal team provides a detailed definition of Tornado Cash, describing it as a set of non-custodial smart contracts that grant users complete ownership and control over their assets without relying on intermediaries or service providers.

Storm 的法律团队在其动议中提供了 Tornado Cash 的详细定义，将其描述为一套非托管智能合约，赋予用户对其资产的完全所有权和控制权，而无需依赖中介机构或服务提供商。

The motion challenges the government's characterization of Tornado Cash as a "mixer" or "service," arguing instead that it is a decentralized protocol that operates autonomously. Furthermore, Storm's team contends that he could not have controlled the use of Tornado Cash by Lazarus and similar entities.

该动议挑战了政府将 Tornado Cash 描述为“混合器”或“服务”的说法，认为它是一种自主运行的去中心化协议。此外，Storm 的团队辩称，他无法控制 Lazarus 和类似实体对 Tornado Cash 的使用。

Charges Lack Legal Basis

指控缺乏法律依据

The motion asserts that the charges against Storm are irrelevant because Tornado Cash does not meet the definition of a financial institution. Users maintain control over their funds, and the protocol is free and open-source software that does not collect any fees.

该动议声称，对 Storm 的指控无关紧要，因为 Tornado Cash 不符合金融机构的定义。用户保持对其资金的控制，该协议是免费的开源软件，不收取任何费用。

Storm's team argues that he could not have conspired to launder funds or operate as a money transmitter since there is no Tornado Cash enterprise that he could have been involved with. Additionally, the motion highlights that Storm and his fellow developers at Peppersec never conspired with alleged criminals.

Storm 的团队辩称，他不可能共谋洗钱或充当资金转移者，因为他没有可能参与任何 Tornado Cash 企业。此外，该动议强调 Storm 和他在 Peppersec 的开发同事从未与犯罪嫌疑人合谋。

Selective Enforcement and Jurisdictional Differences

选择性执法和管辖权差异

The motion also criticizes the Department of Justice for selectively enforcing the law against Tornado Cash, while ignoring other cryptocurrency projects that may have been involved in similar activities.

该动议还批评司法部选择性地执行针对 Tornado Cash 的法律，而忽视了可能参与类似活动的其他加密货币项目。

Furthermore, the motion notes that the legal framework in the Netherlands, where Storm was arrested and initially tried, differs significantly from that of the United States.

此外，该动议指出，斯托姆被捕并最初受审的荷兰的法律框架与美国的法律框架有很大不同。

Charges Echo Those Against Alexey Pertsev

指控与针对阿列克谢·佩尔采夫的指控相呼应

The charges against Storm mirror those faced by Alexey Pertsev, another Tornado Cash developer who was arrested in August 2022. Pertsev is currently on trial in the Netherlands, also facing money laundering allegations.

针对 Storm 的指控与 2022 年 8 月被捕的另一名 Tornado Cash 开发商 Alexey Pertsev 面临的指控相似。Pertsev 目前正在荷兰接受审判，也面临洗钱指控。

Motions Preceding Dismissal Request

驳回请求之前的动议

Prior to filing the motion to dismiss, Storm's legal team filed two additional motions. The first seeks to compel the Department of Justice to provide any communications between US and Dutch authorities regarding Storm's case.

在提出驳回动议之前，Storm 的法律团队又提出了两项​​动议。第一项旨在迫使司法部提供美国和荷兰当局之间有关斯托姆案件的任何通讯。

Conclusion

结论

Roman Storm's motion to dismiss charges against him presents a forceful case that his actions as a developer do not constitute criminal activity. The motion challenges the definition of Tornado Cash, the lack of evidence against Storm, and the selective enforcement of the law.

罗曼·斯托姆 (Roman Storm) 驳回对他的指控的动议提供了强有力的证据，证明他作为开发商的行为不构成犯罪活动。该动议挑战了 Tornado Cash 的定义、缺乏针对 Storm 的证据以及选择性执行法律。

The outcome of this case has significant implications for the future of cryptocurrency development and the boundaries of digital privacy. If Storm's motion succeeds, it could potentially set a precedent for how the legal system treats software developers and the use of privacy-enhancing technologies in the cryptocurrency realm.

此案的结果对于加密货币发展的未来和数字隐私的边界具有重大影响。如果 Storm 的动议获得成功，它可能会为法律体系如何对待软件开发人员以及在加密货币领域使用隐私增强技术树立先例。