中本聰訴訟撤銷：克雷格·賴特撤回案件

週一，自稱中本聰的克雷格懷特 (Craig Wright) 撤回了其控股公司對 12 名比特幣開發商提起的訴訟。該訴訟於 2021 年發起，旨在迫使開發人員修改比特幣程式碼，以授予 Wright 存取儲存在他聲稱遺失私鑰的地址中的 111,000 BTC 的權限。這次撤回是在英國法官三月做出裁決之後做出的，賴特不是中本聰，不能主張比特幣白皮書的版權。

Satoshi Nakamoto Lawsuit Dropped: Key Developments Unfold

中本聰訴訟撤銷：關鍵進展展開

On Monday, a significant legal milestone was reached in the Satoshi Nakamoto lawsuit saga, as Craig Wright, the self-proclaimed inventor of Bitcoin, withdrew his lawsuit against 12 Bitcoin developers. This lawsuit has been ongoing since 2021, alleging that the developers had possession of private keys to a large cache of Bitcoin and sought to force them to modify the Bitcoin code to enable Wright's access to these funds.

週一，中本聰訴訟傳奇達到了一個重要的法律里程碑，自稱比特幣發明者的克雷格懷特 (Craig Wright) 撤回了對 12 名比特幣開發商的訴訟。該訴訟自 2021 年以來一直持續，指控開發人員擁有大量比特幣的私鑰，並試圖迫使他們修改比特幣程式碼，以使 Wright 能夠存取這些資金。

The Bitcoin Legal Defense Fund (BLDF), a non-profit organization established to support the defense of Bitcoin developers in this lawsuit, has officially confirmed the news. The BLDF's announcement carries a nuanced view, as it was founded by individuals targeted in the lawsuit. Nonetheless, its credibility remains intact.

比特幣法律辯護基金（BLDF）是一個為支持比特幣開發者在這場訴訟中辯護而成立的非營利組織，現已正式證實了這一消息。 BLDF 的聲明帶有微妙的觀點，因為它是由訴訟目標個人創立的。儘管如此，它的可信度仍然完好無損。

Background: The Tulip Trust and Satoshi Nakamoto Controversy

背景：鬱金香信託與中本聰爭議

The roots of this legal battle lie in the so-called "Tulip Trust," a trust purportedly holding the private keys to Bitcoin addresses associated with Satoshi Nakamoto. This trust was established during the early days of Bitcoin's inception by three individuals: Nakamoto, the late Dave Kleinman, and Craig Wright himself.

這場法律戰的根源在於所謂的“鬱金香信託”，該信託據稱持有與中本聰相關的比特幣地址的私鑰。這種信任是在比特幣誕生初期由三個人建立的：中本聰、已故的戴夫克萊曼和克雷格賴特本人。

The trust's structure involves multiple keys protecting the stored keys, with one likely held by Wright, another by Kleinman's brother, and a hypothetical third key attributed to Nakamoto, whose whereabouts have remained unknown since 2011.

信託的結構涉及多個金鑰來保護所儲存的金鑰，其中一把可能由Wright 持有，另一把由Kleinman 的兄弟持有，而假設的第三把鑰匙由中本聰持有，自2011 年以來，中本聰的下落一直不明。

In 2021, Wright's company, Tulip Trading, filed a lawsuit against 12 Bitcoin Core developers. Wright claimed that his keys had been stolen and that the developers held the ability to modify the Bitcoin code, granting him access to approximately 111,000 BTC. The developers, unsurprisingly, refused, recognizing the impossibility of forcing the entire Bitcoin network to adapt to a modified version of the code.

2021 年，賴特的公司 Tulip Trading 對 12 名比特幣核心開發人員提起訴訟。賴特聲稱他的金鑰已被盜，並且開發人員擁有修改比特幣代碼的能力，使他能夠訪問約 111,000 比特幣。毫不奇怪，開發人員拒絕了，因為他們認識到強迫整個比特幣網路適應程式碼的修改版本是不可能的。

The Lost Case: Wright's Identity Disputed

失落的案件：賴特的身份有爭議

Independent of the lawsuit against Bitcoin developers, Wright also asserted ownership of the Bitcoin white paper, implicitly claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto. In response, the companies sued founded the Cryptocurrency Open Patent Alliance (COPA). COPA subsequently filed a counterclaim against Wright, alleging the presentation of falsified evidence in his attempt to prove his identity as Nakamoto.

除了針對比特幣開發人員的訴訟之外，賴特還聲稱擁有比特幣白皮書，並含蓄地聲稱自己是中本聰。作為回應，被起訴的公司成立了加密貨幣開放專利聯盟（COPA）。 COPA 隨後對賴特提出反訴，指控賴特在試圖證明自己中本聰身份時提供了偽造的證據。

In March of this year, a court ruled in COPA's favor, declaring that Wright was not Satoshi Nakamoto. The court's findings spanned several key points:

今年 3 月，法院作出了 COPA 勝訴的裁決，宣布 Wright 不是中本聰。法院的調查結果涵蓋了幾個關鍵點：

1. Wright is not the author of the Bitcoin white paper.
2. Wright is not the individual operating under the Satoshi Nakamoto pseudonym from 2008 to 2011.
3. Wright did not create the Bitcoin system.
4. Wright is not the author of the initial versions of the Bitcoin software.

This ruling had significant implications, as it effectively undermined the Tulip Trading case against the Bitcoin developers. Without Wright's established identity as Nakamoto, there was no legitimate basis for compelling them to modify the Bitcoin code.

賴特不是比特幣白皮書的作者。因為它有效地削弱了針對比特幣開發人員的鬱金香交易案。如果沒有賴特確定的中本聰身份，就沒有合法依據迫使他們修改比特幣代碼。

The Withdrawal: A Victory for Open Source

撤銷：開源的勝利

Wright's withdrawal of the lawsuit against Bitcoin developers marks the culmination of a lengthy legal battle. The BLDF hailed this outcome as a "victory for Bitcoin developers and open source software in general."

賴特撤回對比特幣開發人員的訴訟標誌著一場漫長的法律鬥爭的高潮。 BLDF 稱讚這一結果是「比特幣開發者和整個開源軟體的勝利」。

The organization emphasized that Wright's defeat has averted setting a dangerous precedent where developers could face potential liability for their open source contributions. The lawsuit's dismissal reinforces the importance of upholding open source software as a collaborative, community-driven endeavor.

該組織強調，賴特的失敗避免了一個危險的先例，即開發人員可能因其開源貢獻而面臨潛在的責任。該訴訟的駁回凸顯了維護開源軟體作為協作、社群驅動的努力的重要性。

Jack Dorsey's Intriguing Role

傑克多西的有趣角色

An intriguing aspect of this legal saga is the involvement of Jack Dorsey, the former CEO of Twitter and a vocal supporter of Bitcoin. Dorsey's name appears among the co-founders of both the BLDF and COPA.

這場法律傳奇的一個有趣的方面是 Twitter 前執行長、比特幣的公開支持者傑克·多西 (Jack Dorsey) 的參與。多西的名字出現在 BLDF 和 COPA 的聯合創始人中。

While Dorsey's direct involvement in the Tulip Trust lawsuit remains unclear, his presence in these organizations signifies his substantial support for Bitcoin and its community. He has emerged as a prominent advocate, willing to provide financial and legal backing to those defending Bitcoin's integrity.

雖然多西是否直接參與鬱金香信託訴訟尚不清楚，但他在這些組織中的存在表明他對比特幣及其社區的大力支持。他已成為一位傑出的倡導者，願意為那些捍衛比特幣完整性的人提供財務和法律支援。

Conclusion

結論

The withdrawal of Craig Wright's lawsuit represents a significant victory for the Bitcoin community. The legal challenges to Bitcoin's decentralized nature have been overcome, preserving the integrity and independence of its developers.

克雷格賴特撤回訴訟代表比特幣社群的重大勝利。比特幣去中心化性質的法律挑戰已經被克服，保留了其開發者的完整性和獨立性。

The role of Jack Dorsey highlights the growing prominence of Bitcoin supporters who are willing to defend the project and its underlying principles. As Bitcoin continues to evolve and face new challenges, the support of such individuals will be crucial in ensuring its long-term success.

傑克·多西（Jack Dorsey）的角色凸顯了願意捍衛該項目及其基本原則的比特幣支持者日益突出的。隨著比特幣不斷發展並面臨新的挑戰，這些人的支持對於確保其長期成功至關重要。