Ripple 提出動議，以打擊 SEC 專家在 XRP 傳奇中提交的意見

在與 SEC 持續的法律鬥爭中，Ripple Labs Inc. 已提出一項動議，要求刪除新引入的專家資料，認為 SEC 的時機和策略構成不公平做法。 Ripple 對遲交的專家聲明和隨附的證據提出質疑，聲稱其不及時且未在指定的發現期內披露。

Ripple Labs Files Motion to Strike New SEC Expert Materials in Ongoing Litigation

Ripple Labs 提出動議，要求在正在進行的訴訟中刪除新的 SEC 專家資料

In a significant legal maneuver, Ripple Labs Inc. has filed a motion to strike new expert materials submitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the ongoing court saga that has captured significant investor attention.

Ripple Labs Inc. 在一項重大法律行動中提出了一項動議，要求刪除美國證券交易委員會 (SEC) 在正在進行的法庭訴訟中提交的新專家資料，該訴訟引起了投資者的廣泛關注。

Ripple's Motion

漣漪的運動

Ripple Labs argues that the SEC's introduction of a new expert declaration and accompanying exhibits, prepared by Andrea Fox, after the agreed discovery deadline constitutes unfair legal practice. This declaration, submitted in support of the SEC's motion for remedies and entry of final judgment, is being contested by Ripple on grounds of untimeliness and non-disclosure during the designated discovery period.

Ripple Labs 辯稱，SEC 在商定的發現期限之後推出由 Andrea Fox 準備的新專家聲明和隨附證據構成了不公平的法律實踐。該聲明是為了支持美國證券交易委員會提出的補救措施和作出最終判決的動議而提交的，但 Ripple 正以不及時和在指定發現期內未披露為由提出異議。

Andrea Fox, an Assistant Chief Accountant in the SEC's Division of Enforcement, provided detailed accounting analyses aimed at calculating the net profits Ripple allegedly gained from what the court previously ruled as unauthorized securities sales of XRP.

SEC 執法部門助理首席會計師 Andrea Fox 提供了詳細的會計分析，旨在計算 Ripple 據稱從法院先前裁定為未經授權的 XRP 證券銷售中獲得的淨利潤。

Ripple contends that Fox's input clearly extends beyond mere summarization of data, engaging in substantive accounting judgments without prior disclosure as an expert witness. "This is precisely the type of 'sandbagging' that Rule 37(c)(1) is designed to prevent," Ripple's legal team emphasized, citing Abraham v. Leigh as a precedent.

瑞波認為，福克斯的輸入顯然超出了單純的數據匯總範圍，在沒有作為專家證人事先披露的情況下進行了實質性的會計判斷。 「這正是規則 37(c)(1) 旨在防止的『沙袋』類型，」Ripple 的法律團隊強調，並引用了亞伯拉罕訴利 (Abraham v. Leigh) 的先例。

SEC's Position and Ripple's Rebuttal

SEC 的立場和 Ripple 的反駁

During the legal proceedings, the SEC categorized Fox not as a factual or expert witness but as a "summary witness." Ripple, however, argues that her deep dive into financial records and application of specialized accounting knowledge squarely positions her as an expert witness, necessitating earlier disclosure as per Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a).

在法律訴訟過程中，美國證券交易委員會並未將福斯歸類為事實證人或專家證人，而是「摘要證人」。然而，Ripple 辯稱，她對財務記錄的深入研究和專業會計知識的應用使她成為專家證人，因此有必要根據聯邦民事訴訟規則 26(a) 提前披露。

Ripple's filing stresses the procedural disadvantage imposed by the SEC's timing, which deprived Ripple of the opportunity for a thorough cross-examination of Fox's findings and to present a rebuttal report. Such actions, according to Ripple, necessitate striking the late disclosure to prevent prejudicial impacts on its defense and the integrity of the legal process.

Ripple 的文件強調了 SEC 時機造成的程序上的劣勢，這剝奪了 Ripple 對 Fox 調查結果進行徹底交叉審查並提交反駁報告的機會。 Ripple 表示，此類行為有必要阻止逾期揭露，以防止對其辯護和法律程序的完整性產生不利影響。

Implications of the Motion

議案的影響

The court's decision on Ripple's motion will impact the ongoing litigation and potentially set a precedent for the timing and disclosure of expert materials in future cases. A decision in Ripple's favor could strengthen the rights of defendants to have adequate time to review and challenge expert testimony. Conversely, a decision in favor of the SEC could grant regulatory agencies greater latitude in submitting expert materials at later stages of litigation.

法院對 Ripple 動議的裁決將影響正在進行的訴訟，並可能為未來案件中專家材料的時間表和披露開創先例。對瑞波有利的決定可以加強被告有足夠時間審查和質疑專家證詞的權利。相反，有利於 SEC 的決定可以賦予監管機構在訴訟後期提交專家材料的更大自由度。

The outcome of this legal battle is closely watched by the cryptocurrency industry, investors, and legal experts, as it has implications for the future regulation of digital assets. The court's decision is expected to provide further guidance on the legal boundaries surrounding the classification, disclosure, and admissibility of expert evidence in complex securities cases.

這場法律戰的結果受到加密貨幣產業、投資者和法律專家的密切關注，因為它對未來數位資產的監管具有影響。法院的裁決預計將為複雜證券案件中專家證據的分類、披露和可接受性的法律界限提供進一步的指導。