理查德·心（Richard Heart）指責Makerdao失敗了權力下放和自主權的基本測試

在一份關於Makerdao的旗艦Stablecoin的橋接版本的言論中，Dai笑了起來，他的心笑了，Makerdao管理員有權覆蓋社區投票或借用幾乎沒有合理的代幣。

Hex founder and Europol fugitive Richard Heart has accused the Maker Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of failing basic tests of decentralization and autonomy.

HEX創始人兼歐洲刑警組織Richard Heart指責製造商分散自治組織（DAO）失敗了分散和自治的基本測試。

In a note concluding a long rant against a bridged version of MakerDAO’s flagship stablecoin, DAI, Heart chuckled that MakerDAO administrators have powers to override community votes or borrow barely-collateralized tokens.

在一份關於Makerdao的旗艦Stablecoin的橋接版本的言論中，Dai笑了起來，他的心笑了，Makerdao管理員有權覆蓋社區投票或借用幾乎沒有合理的代幣。

He prodded admins to finally exercise their authority to rug-pull the project and “do the funniest thing.”

他促使管理員終於行使了他們的權力來剝奪該項目，並“做最有趣的事情”。

On the Ethereum blockchain, MakerDAO’s stablecoin DAI has traded close to its intended $1 peg for many years. However, a copy of the MakerDAO and its DAI stablecoin on the Richard Heart-founded blockchain Pulsechain, pDAI, has crashed to close to $0.

在以太坊區塊鏈上，Makerdao的Stablecoin Dai多年來一直在其預期的1美元釘上交易。但是，Makerdao及其在Richard令人心動的區塊鏈Pulsechain（PDAI）上的Dai Stablecoin的副本已墜毀在接近$ 0。

For context, Pulsechain is a modified version of Ethereum that copied over all of its tokens and projects as of a snapshot date. Ethereum-based projects like Uniswap and Compound each have an unauthorized clone of themselves running on Pulsechain.

對於上下文，PulseChain是一個修改的以太坊版本，截至快照日期，它在其所有令牌和項目上複製了。基於以太坊的項目，例如Uniswap和Compound，每個項目都有在Pulsechain上運行的未經授權的克隆。

In a string of tweets, Heart shared pDAI’s embarrassing $400,000 worth of liquidity on swap markets between Pulsechain and Ethereum. That pales in comparison to the $3.2 billion market capitalization of DAI on Ethereum.

在一系列推文中，Heart在Pulsechain和以太坊之間的交換市場上分享了PDAI令人尷尬的40萬美元流動性。與Dai在以太坊上的32億美元市值相比，這顯得蒼白。

Heart questioned whether insiders at MakerDAO even knew that Pulsechain-based pDAI or pMKR tokens even existed. If they did, he joked, they also control the Pulsechain-based MakerDAO.

心臟質疑Makerdao的內部人員是否甚至知道基於Pulsechain的PDAI或PMKR令牌甚至存在。他開玩笑說，如果他們這樣做的話，他們還控制著基於脈衝堡的Makerdao。

That pDAI has failed to maintain its intended $1 peg, despite cross-blockchain swap markets, indicates that MakerDAO might be an immature project that still requires active intervention by humans.

儘管交叉互換市場，PDAI仍未能保持其預期的1釘，這表明Makerdao可能是一個不成熟的項目，仍然需要人類的積極干預。

Making his view clear, Heart called the stablecoin “bugged, risk-laden, exploited, and fake.”

使他的觀點清晰，心臟稱為穩定的人，“被竊聽，冒險，被剝削和假貨”。

Heart offered relatively little evidence that MakerDAO’s administrators could (or would) “do the funniest thing” and rug-pull their Pulsechain clone. As early as 2020, for its part, MakerDAO claimed to have eliminated admin keys altogether.

心臟提供的證據相對較少，表明Makerdao的管理員可以（或者）“做最有趣的事情”，並剝奪了他們的Pulsechain克隆。馬克多（Makerdao）早在2020年就聲稱已經完全消除了管理員鑰匙。

Of course, the same key-burning ceremony supposedly occurred at UniSwap, but that doesn’t mean that Maker or UniSwap are fully controlled by their community. Famously, Uniswap insiders have decided to delist tokens from its front end without community input, censored voting issues from reaching a formal voting phase, and delayed the implementation of certain votes from its community.

當然，據說同樣的燃燒儀式是在uniswap舉行的，但這並不意味著製造商或uniswap受其社區充分控制。著名的是，UNISWAP內部人士決定將其從其前端界定，而沒有社區投入，從而審查了投票問題，從達到正式投票階段，並推遲了其社區的某些投票的實施。

DAOs also tend to centralize around venture capitalists who can mobilize a large vote or centralized exchange executives who have the power to use their customers’ tokens to vote.

道斯還傾向於圍繞風險資本家集中，他們可以動員大型投票或有權利用客戶代幣投票的集中交易所高管。

MakerDAO decentralization has its own history of controversy. Founder Rune Christensen, known by some as a "Mad King," once wildly promised to de-peg the DAI stablecoin.

Makerdao權力下放有其自身的爭議歷史。創始人符文·克里斯滕森（Rune Christensen）被一些人稱為“瘋狂的國王”，曾經很瘋狂地承諾將戴伊·斯塔布雷因（Dai Stablecoin）脫穎而出。

Christensen later rebranded MakerDAO to Sky Protocol and pivoted away from its non-yield-bearing DAI to yield-bearing USDS. Christensen initially waved off concerns about the rebranding, yet just a few months later, indicated that he might be willing to consider bringing back the MakerDAO brand.

克里斯滕森（Christensen）後來將馬克爾多（Makerdao）重新命名為天空協議，並從其非收益的dai轉移到了付出的含量。克里斯滕森（Christensen）最初揮舞著對品牌重塑的擔憂，但僅僅幾個月後，他表明他可能願意考慮帶回Makerdao品牌。

Heart has accused MakerDAO (or Sky Protocol) of having the power to control the Pulsechain version of DAI or MKR.

Heart指責Makerdao（或天空協議）具有控制Dai或MKR的脈衝技術版本的力量。

Heart’s critique of MakerDAO highlights ongoing debates about the decentralization and autonomy of DAOs. Meanwhile, his own projects like Pulsechain face idiosyncratic challenges like the pricing collapse of pDAI.

Heart對Makerdao的批評強調了有關Daos的權力下放和自治的持續辯論。同時，他自己的項目（如Pulsechain）面臨著特殊的挑戰，例如PDAI的定價崩潰。