理查德·心（Richard Heart）指责Makerdao失败了权力下放和自主权的基本测试

在一份关于Makerdao的旗舰Stablecoin的桥接版本的言论中，Dai笑了起来，他的心笑了，Makerdao管理员有权覆盖社区投票或借用几乎没有合理的代币。

Hex founder and Europol fugitive Richard Heart has accused the Maker Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) of failing basic tests of decentralization and autonomy.

HEX创始人兼欧洲刑警组织Richard Heart指责制造商分散自治组织（DAO）失败了分散和自治的基本测试。

In a note concluding a long rant against a bridged version of MakerDAO’s flagship stablecoin, DAI, Heart chuckled that MakerDAO administrators have powers to override community votes or borrow barely-collateralized tokens.

在一份关于Makerdao的旗舰Stablecoin的桥接版本的言论中，Dai笑了起来，他的心笑了，Makerdao管理员有权覆盖社区投票或借用几乎没有合理的代币。

He prodded admins to finally exercise their authority to rug-pull the project and “do the funniest thing.”

他促使管理员终于行使了他们的权力来剥夺该项目，并“做最有趣的事情”。

On the Ethereum blockchain, MakerDAO’s stablecoin DAI has traded close to its intended $1 peg for many years. However, a copy of the MakerDAO and its DAI stablecoin on the Richard Heart-founded blockchain Pulsechain, pDAI, has crashed to close to $0.

在以太坊区块链上，Makerdao的Stablecoin Dai多年来一直在其预期的1美元钉上交易。但是，Makerdao及其在Richard令人心动的区块链Pulsechain（PDAI）上的Dai Stablecoin的副本已坠毁在接近$ 0。

For context, Pulsechain is a modified version of Ethereum that copied over all of its tokens and projects as of a snapshot date. Ethereum-based projects like Uniswap and Compound each have an unauthorized clone of themselves running on Pulsechain.

对于上下文，PulseChain是一个修改的以太坊版本，截至快照日期，它在其所有令牌和项目上复制了。基于以太坊的项目，例如Uniswap和Compound，每个项目都有在Pulsechain上运行的未经授权的克隆。

In a string of tweets, Heart shared pDAI’s embarrassing $400,000 worth of liquidity on swap markets between Pulsechain and Ethereum. That pales in comparison to the $3.2 billion market capitalization of DAI on Ethereum.

在一系列推文中，Heart在Pulsechain和以太坊之间的交换市场上分享了PDAI令人尴尬的40万美元流动性。与Dai在以太坊上的32亿美元市值相比，这显得苍白。

Heart questioned whether insiders at MakerDAO even knew that Pulsechain-based pDAI or pMKR tokens even existed. If they did, he joked, they also control the Pulsechain-based MakerDAO.

心脏质疑Makerdao的内部人员是否甚至知道基于Pulsechain的PDAI或PMKR令牌甚至存在。他开玩笑说，如果他们这样做的话，他们还控制着基于脉冲堡的Makerdao。

That pDAI has failed to maintain its intended $1 peg, despite cross-blockchain swap markets, indicates that MakerDAO might be an immature project that still requires active intervention by humans.

尽管交叉互换市场，PDAI仍未能保持其预期的1钉，这表明Makerdao可能是一个不成熟的项目，仍然需要人类的积极干预。

Making his view clear, Heart called the stablecoin “bugged, risk-laden, exploited, and fake.”

使他的观点清晰，心脏称为稳定的人，“被窃听，冒险，被剥削和假货”。

Heart offered relatively little evidence that MakerDAO’s administrators could (or would) “do the funniest thing” and rug-pull their Pulsechain clone. As early as 2020, for its part, MakerDAO claimed to have eliminated admin keys altogether.

心脏提供的证据相对较少，表明Makerdao的管理员可以（或者）“做最有趣的事情”，并剥夺了他们的Pulsechain克隆。马克多（Makerdao）早在2020年就声称已经完全消除了管理员钥匙。

Of course, the same key-burning ceremony supposedly occurred at UniSwap, but that doesn’t mean that Maker or UniSwap are fully controlled by their community. Famously, Uniswap insiders have decided to delist tokens from its front end without community input, censored voting issues from reaching a formal voting phase, and delayed the implementation of certain votes from its community.

当然，据说同样的燃烧仪式是在uniswap举行的，但这并不意味着制造商或uniswap受其社区充分控制。著名的是，UNISWAP内部人士决定将其从其前端界定，而没有社区投入，从而审查了投票问题，从达到正式投票阶段，并推迟了其社区的某些投票的实施。

DAOs also tend to centralize around venture capitalists who can mobilize a large vote or centralized exchange executives who have the power to use their customers’ tokens to vote.

道斯还倾向于围绕风险资本家集中，他们可以动员大型投票或有权利用客户代币投票的集中交易所高管。

MakerDAO decentralization has its own history of controversy. Founder Rune Christensen, known by some as a "Mad King," once wildly promised to de-peg the DAI stablecoin.

Makerdao权力下放有其自身的争议历史。创始人符文·克里斯滕森（Rune Christensen）被一些人称为“疯狂的国王”，曾经很疯狂地承诺将戴伊·斯塔布雷因（Dai Stablecoin）脱颖而出。

Christensen later rebranded MakerDAO to Sky Protocol and pivoted away from its non-yield-bearing DAI to yield-bearing USDS. Christensen initially waved off concerns about the rebranding, yet just a few months later, indicated that he might be willing to consider bringing back the MakerDAO brand.

克里斯滕森（Christensen）后来将马克尔多（Makerdao）重新命名为天空协议，并从其非收益的dai转移到了付出的含量。克里斯滕森（Christensen）最初挥舞着对品牌重塑的担忧，但仅仅几个月后，他表明他可能愿意考虑带回Makerdao品牌。

Heart has accused MakerDAO (or Sky Protocol) of having the power to control the Pulsechain version of DAI or MKR.

Heart指责Makerdao（或天空协议）具有控制Dai或MKR的脉冲技术版本的力量。

Heart’s critique of MakerDAO highlights ongoing debates about the decentralization and autonomy of DAOs. Meanwhile, his own projects like Pulsechain face idiosyncratic challenges like the pricing collapse of pDAI.

Heart对Makerdao的批评强调了有关Daos的权力下放和自治的持续辩论。同时，他自己的项目（如Pulsechain）面临着特殊的挑战，例如PDAI的定价崩溃。