OM令牌潛水，引發市場操縱問題

曼特拉（Mantra）的原住民代幣OM，引起了人們對市場操縱的關注。當投資者拒絕傾銷令牌時，鏈上數據顯示，$ OM的2.27億美元在崩潰之前迅速轉移到交易所。

As the native token of Mantra went on a nosedive, sparking concerns of market manipulation, investors denied dumping the token.

隨著咒語的原住民令牌進行了一個頑強的市場操縱，引發了人們的關注，投資者否認傾倒了令牌。

On-chain data showed that $227 million in $OM were swiftly moved to exchanges ahead of the collapse.

鏈上的數據顯示，在崩潰之前，$ 2.27億美元的$ OM迅速轉移到交流。

But what is strikingly concerning is the MANTRA Chain founder, John Patrick Mullin’s alleged post a day before the incident.

但是，令人驚訝的是，咒語連鎖店的創始人約翰·帕特里克·穆林（John Patrick Mullin）涉嫌在事件發生的前一天。

In the tweet on X, Mullin complained about the lack of WiFi connectivity on long-haul flights just the night before the token’s abrupt collapse.

在X上的推文中，穆林抱怨在令牌突然崩潰的前一天晚上，長途航班上缺乏WiFi連通性。

Many found it to be weirdly timed, especially after OM fell from $6.30 to just $0.37 within hours on April 13.

許多人發現這是很奇怪的時機，尤其是在OM在4月13日的幾個小時內從6.30美元下跌至僅0.37美元之後。

One user compared it to the perceived positive handling of the Bybit hack by CEO Ben Zhou. His proactive communication with the users through updates, providing proofs, and reassuring the affected community was seen as a positive image of leadership during a crisis.

一位用戶將其與首席執行官Ben Zhou對Bybit Hack的正面處理進行了比較。他通過更新，提供證據並放心受影響的社區的積極溝通被視為危機期間領導力的積極形象。

On the other hand, critics expressed strong disapproval of the MANTRA founder’s post, deeming it a lack of accountability and poor leadership where he should have been providing transparency and support.

另一方面，批評家表示對咒語創始人的職位表示強烈反對，認為這是缺乏問責制和不良的領導力，在他應該提供透明度和支持的情況下。

MANTRA Founder Claims ‘NOT OUR FAULT’

咒語創始人聲稱“不是我們的錯”

As calls grew against the team’s approach in handling the crisis, Mullin finally responded to the claims.

隨著呼籲與團隊在處理危機方面的方法相反，穆林終於對索賠做出了回應。

Pointing the finger at "reckless forced closures" led by centralized exchanges (CEXs) at a time of low liquidity, Mullin said that the damage wasn't due to any internal foul play.

穆林在流動性低時指出，手指是由集中式交流（CEXS）領導的“魯ck強迫關閉”，穆林說，損害並不是由於任何內部犯規。

During periods of low liquidity, trading activity is often thinner, and markets are more prone to extreme price swings.

在低流動性時期，交易活動通常更薄，市場更容易出現極端價格波動。

"The timing and depth of the crash suggest that a very sudden closure of account positions was initiated without sufficient warning or notice. This was not caused by the team, the MANTRA Chain Association, its core advisors, or MANTRA's investors," Mullin stated.

穆林說：“墜機的時機和深度表明，未經足夠的警告或通知就啟動了非常突然的帳戶頭寸。這不是由團隊，咒語鏈協會，其核心顧問或咒語的投資者引起的。”

While Mullin denies team involvement in the crash, investors remain skeptical given the suspicious timing of exchange transfers and his absence during the crisis.

儘管穆林否認團隊參與墜機事故，但鑑於危機期間的交換時機及其缺席，投資者仍然持懷疑態度。

As investigations continue, MANTRA's reputation hangs in the balance, raising critical questions about transparency and accountability in crypto projects.

隨著調查的繼續，咒語的聲譽懸而未決，引發了有關加密項目中透明度和問責制的關鍵問題。