OM令牌潜水，引发市场操纵问题

曼特拉（Mantra）的原住民代币OM，引起了人们对市场操纵的关注。当投资者拒绝倾销令牌时，链上数据显示，$ OM的2.27亿美元在崩溃之前迅速转移到交易所。

As the native token of Mantra went on a nosedive, sparking concerns of market manipulation, investors denied dumping the token.

随着咒语的原住民令牌进行了一个顽强的市场操纵，引发了人们的关注，投资者否认倾倒了令牌。

On-chain data showed that $227 million in $OM were swiftly moved to exchanges ahead of the collapse.

链上的数据显示，在崩溃之前，$ 2.27亿美元的$ OM迅速转移到交流。

But what is strikingly concerning is the MANTRA Chain founder, John Patrick Mullin’s alleged post a day before the incident.

但是，令人惊讶的是，咒语连锁店的创始人约翰·帕特里克·穆林（John Patrick Mullin）涉嫌在事件发生的前一天。

In the tweet on X, Mullin complained about the lack of WiFi connectivity on long-haul flights just the night before the token’s abrupt collapse.

在X上的推文中，穆林抱怨在令牌突然崩溃的前一天晚上，长途航班上缺乏WiFi连通性。

Many found it to be weirdly timed, especially after OM fell from $6.30 to just $0.37 within hours on April 13.

许多人发现这是很奇怪的时机，尤其是在OM在4月13日的几个小时内从6.30美元下跌至仅0.37美元之后。

One user compared it to the perceived positive handling of the Bybit hack by CEO Ben Zhou. His proactive communication with the users through updates, providing proofs, and reassuring the affected community was seen as a positive image of leadership during a crisis.

一位用户将其与首席执行官Ben Zhou对Bybit Hack的正面处理进行了比较。他通过更新，提供证据并放心受影响的社区的积极沟通被视为危机期间领导力的积极形象。

On the other hand, critics expressed strong disapproval of the MANTRA founder’s post, deeming it a lack of accountability and poor leadership where he should have been providing transparency and support.

另一方面，批评家表示对咒语创始人的职位表示强烈反对，认为这是缺乏问责制和不良的领导力，在他应该提供透明度和支持的情况下。

MANTRA Founder Claims ‘NOT OUR FAULT’

咒语创始人声称“不是我们的错”

As calls grew against the team’s approach in handling the crisis, Mullin finally responded to the claims.

随着呼吁与团队在处理危机方面的方法相反，穆林终于对索赔做出了回应。

Pointing the finger at "reckless forced closures" led by centralized exchanges (CEXs) at a time of low liquidity, Mullin said that the damage wasn't due to any internal foul play.

穆林在流动性低时指出，手指是由集中式交流（CEXS）领导的“鲁ck强迫关闭”，穆林说，损害并不是由于任何内部犯规。

During periods of low liquidity, trading activity is often thinner, and markets are more prone to extreme price swings.

在低流动性时期，交易活动通常更薄，市场更容易出现极端价格波动。

"The timing and depth of the crash suggest that a very sudden closure of account positions was initiated without sufficient warning or notice. This was not caused by the team, the MANTRA Chain Association, its core advisors, or MANTRA's investors," Mullin stated.

穆林说：“坠机的时机和深度表明，未经足够的警告或通知就启动了非常突然的帐户头寸。这不是由团队，咒语链协会，其核心顾问或咒语的投资者引起的。”

While Mullin denies team involvement in the crash, investors remain skeptical given the suspicious timing of exchange transfers and his absence during the crisis.

尽管穆林否认团队参与坠机事故，但鉴于危机期间的交换时机及其缺席，投资者仍然持怀疑态度。

As investigations continue, MANTRA's reputation hangs in the balance, raising critical questions about transparency and accountability in crypto projects.

随着调查的继续，咒语的声誉悬而未决，引发了有关加密项目中透明度和问责制的关键问题。