美國司法部否認龍捲風現金開發商的駁回動議

美國司法部 (DOJ) 拒絕了 Tornado Cash 開發商 Roman Storm 駁回刑事指控的請求，理由是辯方提出的有爭議的事實更適合陪審團考慮。美國司法部維持其立場，認為 Storm 和他的聯合開發商合謀透過運營未經許可的貨幣傳輸器並透過加密貨幣混合服務 Tornado Cash 違反法律來洗錢。

Tornado Cash Developer's Motion to Dismiss Criminal Charges Denied by U.S. Department of Justice

龍捲風現金開發商駁回刑事指控的動議被美國司法部拒絕

In a significant blow to the defense, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has rejected the request of Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm to dismiss criminal charges against him. The DOJ maintains that the defense's filing contains disputed facts that are more appropriate for jury consideration than early-stage motion arguments.

美國司法部 (DOJ) 拒絕了 Tornado Cash 開發商 Roman Storm 駁回對他的刑事指控的請求，這對辯方來說是一個重大打擊。司法部堅持認為，辯方提交的文件包含有爭議的事實，這些事實比早期動議辯論更適合陪審團考慮。

The charges stem from allegations that Storm and his fellow developer, Roman Semenov, conspired to commit money laundering and violated laws by operating an unlicensed money transmitter through Tornado Cash, a crypto mixing service designed to anonymize blockchain transactions.

這些指控源於Storm 和他的開發同事Roman Semenov 被指控合謀洗錢，並透過Tornado Cash（旨在匿名化區塊鏈交易的加密貨幣混合服務）運營未經許可的貨幣傳輸器，從而違反法律。

DOJ Counters Defense Arguments

司法部反駁辯方論點

In its filing, the DOJ disputes Storm's characterization of Tornado Cash as a mere software code for mixing services and not a money laundering operation. The agency argues that the service encompasses a complex system involving a website, user interface, smart contracts, and a network of "relayers."

美國司法部在其文件中對 Storm 將 Tornado Cash 描述為僅僅是混合服務的軟體程式碼而非洗錢活動提出了異議。該機構認為，該服務包含一個複雜的系統，涉及網站、使用者介面、智慧合約和「中繼器」網路。

Furthermore, the DOJ denies Storm's claims that he lacked control over Tornado Cash. The filing alleges that Storm and his co-founders maintained control over the mixer from 2019 to August 2022.

此外，司法部否認 Storm 聲稱他缺乏對 Tornado Cash 的控制權的說法。文件稱，Storm 及其聯合創始人在 2019 年至 2022 年 8 月期間一直控制著該混音器。

Evidence of Developer Control Presented

提供開發者控制的證據

To support its claims, the DOJ presented screenshots illustrating the disputed functionality of Tornado Cash. The evidence allegedly shows Storm's involvement in building and developing the system and the usage patterns of the service.

為了支持其主張，司法部提供了一些螢幕截圖，說明了 Tornado Cash 有爭議的功能。據稱，證據顯示 Storm 參與了該系統的建構和開發以及該服務的使用模式。

Specifically, the DOJ highlighted that Tornado Cash had a "mixing fee" mechanism, which it argues indicates that the developers had control over the funds deposited by users. The filing also notes that Storm had the authority to blacklist certain addresses, which further suggests his ability to influence the use of the service.

具體來說，司法部強調 Tornado Cash 具有「混合費」機制，認為這表明開發商可以控制用戶存入的資金。該文件還指出，Storm 有權將某些地址列入黑名單，這進一步表明他有能力影響該服務的使用。

DOJ Challenges Storm's Intent

美國司法部質疑 Storm 的意圖

Additionally, the DOJ contests Storm's assertion that he had no knowledge or intent to facilitate money laundering. The filing argues that Storm knew or should have known that Tornado Cash was being used by criminals, including North Korea's Lazarus Group.

此外，司法部對斯托姆的說法提出質疑，即他不知道或意圖協助洗錢。文件稱，Storm 知道或應該知道 Tornado Cash 被犯罪分子使用，其中包括北韓的 Lazarus Group。

Unconstitutional to Dismiss Indictment

駁回起訴違憲

The DOJ emphasizes that dismissing the indictment based on contested views of how Tornado Cash operated or Storm's intent would be unconstitutional. It argues that the evidence presented in its filing supports the charges and that it is for a jury to determine the facts and the guilt or innocence of the defendant.

美國司法部強調，基於對 Tornado Cash 如何運作或 Storm 意圖的有爭議的觀點而駁回起訴書將是違憲的。它辯稱，其文件中提供的證據支持指控，並由陪審團來確定事實以及被告有罪或無罪。

Trial Set for September

九月試用

Storm is scheduled to stand trial in September, while Semenov remains at large. The DOJ's rejection of the motion to dismiss is a major setback for the defense and strengthens the government's position in the case.

斯托姆定於九月接受審判，而謝苗諾夫仍在逃。司法部拒絕駁回動議對辯方來說是一個重大挫折，並加強了政府在此案中的立場。

The verdict in the Tornado Cash case will have significant implications for the cryptocurrency industry. It will establish legal precedents regarding the role of developers in preventing money laundering and the extent to which crypto mixing services can be held accountable for facilitating illicit transactions.

Tornado Cash 案的判決將對加密貨幣產業產生重大影響。它將就開發商在防止洗錢方面的作用以及加密貨幣混合服務對促進非法交易負責的程度建立法律先例。