頑固分子拒絕法院的中本聰裁決，加劇了持久的謎團

英國高等法院明確裁定克雷格·賴特不是比特幣的創造者中本聰。儘管做出了裁決，賴特的熱情支持者仍然繼續維持他的中本聰身分。這種堅定不移的信念凸顯了糾正根深蒂固的錯誤訊息所面臨的挑戰，即使面對壓倒性的證據。關於比特幣起源作為一種心理操作（psyop）的猜測重新出現，一些理論認為它是由三個字母的機構創建的，目的是控制資本流動。

The Enduring Enigma of Satoshi Nakamoto: Diehard Supporters Refuse to Accept Court Ruling

中本聰的持久謎團：頑固支持者拒絕接受法院裁決

In a landmark verdict that shook the cryptosphere, the UK High Court unequivocally ruled in March that Craig Wright, a self-proclaimed computer scientist, is not Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic creator of Bitcoin. This definitive judgment marked the culmination of a years-long and contentious legal battle over Wright's claims to be Bitcoin's elusive founder.

英國高等法院在 3 月做出了震撼加密貨幣界的里程碑式判決，明確裁定自稱電腦科學家的克雷格懷特 (Craig Wright) 不是比特幣的神秘創造者中本聰 (Satoshi Nakamoto)。這項最終判決標誌著針對賴特自稱是比特幣難以捉摸的創始人的長達數年且充滿爭議的法律鬥爭的高潮。

Despite the overwhelming evidence presented in court and the resounding ruling of Judge Mellor, a resolute group of Wright's loyalists have adamantly rejected the verdict. They cling tenaciously to the notion that Wright is Satoshi, impervious to the weight of legal proceedings.

儘管法庭上提供了壓倒性的證據，而且梅勒法官做出了響亮的裁決，但賴特的一群堅決的忠誠者堅決拒絕了這一判決。他們頑固地堅持賴特就是中本聰，不受法律訴訟的影響。

Unshaken Belief in a Court-Defied Claim

堅定不移地相信法庭駁回的索賠

"X influencer" Ryuushi, a staunch Wright supporter, dismissed the proceedings, asserting that Wright remains the most probable candidate for Satoshi. His argument hinges on the absence of "even one iota of evidence" from the claimants, COPA, suggesting an alternative Satoshi candidate.

「X 影響者」Ryuushi 是賴特的堅定支持者，他駁回了訴訟程序，聲稱賴特仍然是中本聰最有可能的候選人。他的論點取決於原告 COPA 缺乏「哪怕一丁點的證據」來暗示另一位中本聰候選人。

However, Ryuushi's reasoning overlooks the fundamental nature of legal cases. The court's mandate was not to unearth the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto but to adjudicate Wright's specific claims of ownership over Bitcoin's intellectual property rights. The judge's decision unequivocally rejected those claims, rendering Ryuushi's argument moot.

然而，龍志的推理忽略了法律案件的根本性質。法院的任務不是揭露中本聰的真實身份，而是裁決賴特對比特幣智慧財產權所有權的具體主張。法官的判決明確駁回了這些主張，使 Ryuushi 的論點變得毫無意義。

Conspiracy Theories and Allegations of Retaliation

陰謀論和報復指控

Another unwavering Wright ally, "Moon," ventured further, alleging that a recent Bitcoin market downturn was a direct consequence of Wright, or "Satoshi," selling his vast cache of 1.1 million BTC mined during the early days of Bitcoin's development. Moon suggested this was a reprisal for the court's ruling against Wright.

賴特的另一位堅定盟友「Moon」更進一步，聲稱最近的比特幣市場低迷是賴特（或「中本聰」）出售其在比特幣發展初期開采的110 萬枚比特幣的直接後果。文在寅表示，這是對法院對賴特不利裁決的報復。

Cryptocurrency analysts, however, attribute the market dip to broader macroeconomic factors, such as escalating tensions in the Middle East and fears of a potential World War III, rather than mass sell-offs of Satoshi-era coins.

然而，加密貨幣分析師將市場下跌歸因於更廣泛的宏觀經濟因素，例如中東緊張局勢升級和對潛在第三次世界大戰的擔憂，而不是中本聰時代硬幣的大規模拋售。

The Enduring Mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto: Speculation Resurfaces

中本聰的持久謎團：猜測重新浮出水面

Ryuushi's flawed reasoning notwithstanding, his words touched upon the enduring enigma of Satoshi Nakamoto. Despite the High Court's definitive ruling against Wright, the identity of Bitcoin's creator remains the subject of intense speculation.

儘管龍志的推理有缺陷，但他的話觸及了中本聰的持久謎團。儘管高等法院做出了不利於賴特的最終裁決，但比特幣創造者的身份仍然是人們強烈猜測的話題。

Cryptographer Nick Szabo has long been linked to Satoshi, given his pioneering work on digital contracts and his concept of "bit gold," which is widely regarded as a precursor to Bitcoin's architecture. Computer scientist Hal Finney is also frequently proposed as a candidate. Finney was an early participant in Bitcoin's development and the first to receive a peer-to-peer Bitcoin transaction.

密碼學家 Nick Szabo 長期以來一直與中本聰聯繫在一起，因為他在數位合約方面的開創性工作以及他的「比特黃金」概念，被廣泛認為是比特幣架構的先驅。計算機科學家哈爾芬尼也經常被提議作為候選人。芬尼是比特幣開發的早期參與者，也是第一個接受點對點比特幣交易的人。

However, persistent theories posit that Bitcoin is the clandestine creation of intelligence agencies, designed to ensnare "useful idiots" who recognize the impending collapse of fiat currencies and inflation but to confine these "idiots" within a digitally controlled realm.

然而，持續存在的理論認為，比特幣是情報機構的秘密創造，旨在誘捕那些認識到法定貨幣和通貨膨脹即將崩潰的“有用的白痴”，但將這些“白痴”限制在數字控制的領域內。

The Psyop Hypothesis and Calls for Kindness

心理假設和善意呼喚

Precious metal advocate Peter Spina questioned whether cryptocurrencies constitute the "biggest psyop," preventing capital flows into tangible assets like gold that could potentially cripple fiat currency proponents and the establishment.

貴金屬倡導者 Peter Spina 質疑加密貨幣是否構成“最大的心理戰”，阻止資本流入黃金等有形資產，這可能會削弱法定貨幣支持者和當權者的能力。

Additionally, based on an IP address investigation, "Financelot" claimed that Bitcoin and XRP/Ripple originated from an NSA data center in Arizona.

此外，根據 IP 位址調查，「Financelot」聲稱比特幣和 XRP/Ripple 源自亞利桑那州的 NSA 資料中心。

Despite these speculative theories, Ryan X. Charles has urged the cryptocurrency community to extend compassion to those who maintain Wright's fabricated Satoshi identity. Psychologists attribute this phenomenon to the "backfire effect," where individuals strengthen their beliefs even when confronted with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

儘管存在這些推測性理論，瑞安·X·查爾斯仍敦促加密貨幣社區對那些維護賴特捏造的中本聰身份的人表示同情。心理學家將這種現象歸因於“適得其反效應”，即即使面對壓倒性的相反證據，個人也會強化自己的信念。

Conclusion

結論

The persistent denial of Craig Wright's most fervent supporters highlights the pervasive influence of misinformation and the formidable challenge of correcting deeply ingrained beliefs. It remains a sobering reminder that in the realm of digital currencies, the pursuit of truth can be a tortuous and often futile endeavor.

克雷格·賴特最狂熱的支持者的持續否認凸顯了錯誤訊息的普遍影響以及糾正根深蒂固的信念所面臨的巨大挑戰。這仍然是一個發人深省的提醒：在數位貨幣領域，追求真理可能是一項曲折且常常徒勞的努力。

As the Bitcoin network approaches its halving milestone, the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, the enigmatic architect of the world's leading cryptocurrency, remains shrouded in mystery. This ongoing enigma serves as a testament to the enduring power of secrecy in the cryptosphere, fueling speculation, fueling conspiracy theories, and reminding us that the true origins of Bitcoin may forever remain a closely guarded secret.

隨著比特幣網路接近減半里程碑，世界領先加密貨幣的神秘架構師中本聰的身份仍然籠罩在神秘之中。這個持續存在的謎團證明了加密領域保密性的持久力量，助長了猜測、陰謀論，並提醒我們，比特幣的真正起源可能永遠是個嚴密保守的秘密。