分析師表示，克雷格賴特贏得最新訴訟的法律機會“基本為零”

分析人士稱，克雷格·賴特 (Craig Wright) 在最近的英國訴訟中提出的 259 項索賠中，超過 70% 的索賠是基於「誤解、公然失實陳述和法律上不連貫的理論」。

Analysis of Craig Wright’s latest UK lawsuit claims reveals that over 70% of them are unfounded, according to X (formerly Twitter) account CSW Fact Check.

根據 X（前 Twitter）帳戶 CSW Fact Check 的數據，對 Craig Wright 最新英國訴訟主張的分析表明，其中超過 70% 的主張毫無根據。

The account examined Wright’s 259 claims and found that 184 of them are unlikely to succeed. Even the remaining 75 claims that appear to have a chance are said to be only "remotely grounded in fact."

該帳戶審查了賴特的 259 項主張，發現其中 184 項不太可能成功。就連剩下的 75 項看似有機會的說法，據說也只是「遙不可及的事實依據」。

According to the fact-checkers, Wright is applying concepts that are irrelevant to Bitcoin’s decentralized nature and displaying "a fundamental disconnect from legal reality."

根據事實查核人員的說法，賴特正在應用與比特幣去中心化性質無關的概念，並表現出「與法律現實的根本脫節」。

"At its core, Wright’s case is a misadventure in legal theory, an elaborate distraction veiling his continued bid for control over Bitcoin’s decentralized future," the account said.

該帳戶稱：“從本質上講，賴特的案件是法律理論中的一次不幸事件，是一次精心設計的干擾，掩蓋了他對比特幣去中心化未來控制權的持續努力。”

The lawsuit, filed by Wright on October 10, sees him representing himself without any legal aid. In the suit, he claims that Bitcoin Core developers have strayed from Bitcoin’s original vision and that his own cryptocurrency, Bitcoin Satoshi Vision (BSV), is the real Bitcoin. He is also seeking over $1 billion in damages.

賴特於 10 月 10 日提起訴訟，他在沒有任何法律援助的情況下為自己辯護。在訴訟中，他聲稱比特幣核心開發人員已經偏離了比特幣最初的願景，而他自己的加密貨幣比特幣中本聰願景（BSV）才是真正的比特幣。他還尋求超過 10 億美元的損失賠償。

Earlier this year, the High Court ruled that Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto and, as a result, the Australian businessman was issued several injunctions, which both CSW Fact Check and patent attorney David Pearce say have already been breached in his latest lawsuit.

今年早些時候，高等法院裁定 Wright 不是中本聰，因此，這位澳洲商人被發布了幾項禁令，CSW Fact Check 和專利律師 David Pearce 都表示，Wright 在最新的訴訟中已經違反了這些禁令。

Craig Wright’s legal chances are ‘basically nil’

克雷格·賴特的法律機會“基本上為零”

According to Pearce, Wright is now in contempt of court for claiming ownership of goodwill that exists in the name "Bitcoin." This offense carries a maximum sentence of two years in prison and potential fines.

根據皮爾斯的說法，賴特現在因聲稱擁有「比特幣」名稱中存在的商譽而構成藐視法庭。該罪名最高可判處兩年監禁並可能處以罰款。

However, the attorney told Protos that he disagrees with Wright’s analysis of database rights in Bitcoin, adding that this particular issue "isn't really that important and will most likely never get tested in court."

然而，律師告訴 Protos，他不同意賴特對比特幣資料庫權利的分析，並補充說這個特定問題「並不是真的那麼重要，而且很可能永遠不會在法庭上得到檢驗」。

He said that he expects the latest case brought by Wright to be dismissed, adding that "it may be solely on the contempt point but there are many other possibilities that could come into play too."

他表示，他預計賴特提起的最新案件將被駁回，並補充說，“這可能只是出於藐視法庭罪，但也有許多其他可能性。”

As for any appeals by Wright, he said that they will also likely fail as they attempt to overturn findings of fact. "Even if permission is granted, I think the chances of overturning the decision of Mellor J are basically nil," he said.

至於賴特的任何上訴，他表示，他們也可能失敗，因為他們試圖推翻事實調查結果。 「即使獲得許可，我認為推翻 Mellor J 決定的機會基本上也為零，」他說。