SEC關閉了對“ Hawk Tuah”女孩的調查，沒有發現欺詐行為的情況

海莉·韋爾奇（Hailey Welch）被普遍稱為“霍克·圖阿（Hawk Tuah）”女孩，已被美國證券交易委員會（SEC）正式清除任何違法行為。

Hailey Welch, famously known as the “Hawk Tuah” girl, has officially been cleared of any wrongdoing by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The regulator has closed its probe into the influencer’s reputational meme coin, $HAWK, discovering no case of fraud or ill intent on Welch’s part.

海莉·韋爾奇（Hailey Welch）被稱為“霍克·圖阿（Hawk Tuah）”女孩，已被美國證券交易委員會（SEC）正式清除了任何不法行為。監管機構已關閉對影響者的聲譽模因硬幣（$ HAWK）的調查，沒有發現欺詐或不對Welch的案件。

The $HAWK token, which soared to a peak valuation of $500 million before crashing by 95% in just 20 minutes, sparked widespread rumors of a pump-and-dump operation. However, upon a thorough review, the SEC concluded that Welch had not engaged in any illegal activities related to the token’s launch and subsequent price movements.

$ HAWK代幣飆升至5億美元的高峰估值，然後在短短20分鐘內墜毀95％，引發了有關泵和降雨運營的廣泛傳聞。但是，經過徹底的審查，SEC得出結論，韋爾奇沒有從事與令牌發布和隨後的價格變動有關的任何非法活動。

Its rollout was met with fervent buzz, propelling the market valuation of $HAWK to the hundreds of millions almost immediately. However, within just a few hours, the price of the token dropped to levels below $60 million, leaving many investors holding onto huge losses. This sharp price decline spawned theories of market manipulation, with many speculating the token creators were behind a prototypical pump-and-dump plot.

它的推出充滿了熱烈的嗡嗡聲，幾乎立即將$ Hawk的市場估值推向了數億美元。但是，在短短幾個小時內，代幣的價格下跌至6000萬美元以下，這使許多投資者遭受了巨大的損失。這種急劇下降的價格下降了市場操縱的理論，許多人猜測令牌創作者是原型的泵送和降點情節的背後。

Despite these accusations, the SEC has now closed its probe without levying any charges or financial penalties against Welch. Confirming the closure of the investigation, and the lack of any charges or sanctions, Welch simply stated, “The investigation is closed, and I will not face any charges or monetary sanctions.”

儘管有這些指控，但SEC現在已經關閉了調查，而無需對韋爾奇徵收任何指控或罰款。韋爾奇證實了調查的結束以及缺乏任何指控或製裁，簡單地說：“調查已關閉，我不會面臨任何指控或貨幣制裁。”

A primary factor in the SEC’s determination was its recent assertion that meme coins are not securities, an argument that went a long way in impacting the decision of the investigation, as it indicated that $HAWK was not within the jurisdiction of the SEC.

美國證券交易委員會（SEC）決定的一個主要因素是它最近斷言模因硬幣不是證券，這一論點在影響調查的決定方面很長一段路，因為它表明$ hawk不在SEC的管轄範圍內。

However, the broader discussion over regulatory oversight of meme coins persists. A majority within the financial and crypto industries are still concerned by the frequency of so-called “rug pulls,” where creators of projects abandon tokens after profiting from their initial run-up. The lack of clear rules leaves investors vulnerable to substantial losses, and calls for stricter regulation continue to rise.

但是，關於模因硬幣監管監督的更廣泛討論仍然存在。金融和加密行業中的大多數人仍然對所謂的“地毯拉力”的頻率感到關注，在這些頻率中，項目的創建者從最初的興起中獲利後就放棄了代幣。缺乏明確的規則使投資者容易受到重大損失的影響，並且要求更嚴格的法規呼籲繼續增加。

Legal commentators and finance analysts have responded to the SEC’s ruling with differing perspectives on its implications. Former SEC attorney Marc Fagel explained that the SEC’s ruling did not indicate Welch was acquitted of any misconduct. Rather, he noted that “the SEC did not find ‘no wrongdoing.’ That’s not something the SEC ever says when closing an investigation.” Instead, the present administration has stated that meme coins are not securities and therefore the SEC does not have jurisdiction.

法律評論員和財務分析師已經對SEC的裁決做出了回應，對其含義的觀點不同。前美國證券交易委員會（SEC）律師馬克·法格爾（Marc Fagel）解釋說，美國證券交易委員會（SEC）的裁決並未表明韋爾奇（Welch）被無罪釋放。相反，他指出：“ SEC並沒有發現'沒有不法行為'。 SEC結束調查時從未說過的話。”取而代之的是，本屆政府指出，模因硬幣不是證券，因此SEC沒有管轄權。

Similarly, legal commentator James Murphy, nicknamed Metalawman, noted that the SEC’s action was not surprising, adding that meme coins are usually not treated as securities, so the SEC wouldn’t have jurisdiction. He elaborated, “The SEC is concentrating on its fundamental roles these days. If there was fraud involved in the launch, criminal prosecutors or state consumer protection agencies might investigate.”

同樣，綽號Metalawman的法律評論員James Murphy指出，SEC的行動並不奇怪，並補充說Meme硬幣通常不被視為證券，因此SEC不會具有管轄權。他詳細闡述了：“ SEC如今專注於其基本角色。如果發射涉及欺詐，刑事檢察官或州消費者保護機構可能會調查。”

While Welch has so far escaped legal action from the SEC, the saga over $HAWK has reignited debates about the need for more stringent regulations in the cryptocurrency market. As meme coins continue to be a source of fascination and speculation, regulators and investors alike are being forced to navigate an increasingly complex financial environment.

儘管韋爾奇（Welch）到目前為止已經逃脫了SEC的法律行動，但霍克（Hawk）超過霍克（Hawk）的薩加（Saga）重新激發了關於在加密貨幣市場上需要更嚴格法規的辯論。隨著模因硬幣繼續成為迷人和猜測的來源，監管機構和投資者都被迫駕馭日益複雜的財務環境。

Although Welch has put the SEC’s inquiry behind her, the crypto world remains divided on how to classify and treat these volatile instruments. Whether stricter regulation will be implemented remains to be seen, but one thing is certain: meme coins are here to stay, and they present both opportunities and dangers for investors around the world.

儘管韋爾奇將SEC的詢問放在她身後，但加密貨幣世界在如何對這些揮發性樂器進行分類和處理方面仍然存在分歧。是否將實施更嚴格的法規還有待觀察，但是可以肯定的是：模因硬幣將留在這裡，它們為世界各地的投資者帶來了機會和危險。