Binance首席執行官Richard Teng在透明度上承諾，因為懷疑超流動攻擊坐騎

但是，這一主張的時機提出了重大問題，因為它與懷疑Binance可能涉及對超流動的攻擊有關

In a recent interview, Binance CEO Richard Teng made a strong assertion of the company's commitment to transparency, security, and compliance. However, the timing of this statement has raised significant questions, especially in light of a recent crypto drama that has seen some in the community openly discuss the possibility of Binance being involved in an attack on a decentralized exchange.

在最近的一次採訪中，Binance首席執行官Richard Teng對公司對透明，安全和合規性的承諾做出了強烈的主張。但是，這一說法的時機提出了重大問題，尤其是鑑於最近的加密戲劇，社區中的一些人公開討論了二手持續事件參與對分散交流的攻擊的可能性。

This assertion comes amid rising suspicions within the crypto community that Binance might have been involved in an attack on Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange platform. Some members of the community believe that Hyperliquid poses a potential threat to the dominance of centralized exchanges, setting the stage for what could be described as a "crypto proxy war."

這一斷言是由於加密社區內的懷疑提高，即binance可能參與了對分散的交換平台Hyperliquid的攻擊。該社區的一些成員認為，超流動性對集中交流的統治地位構成了潛在的威脅，為被稱為“加密代理戰爭”的舞台奠定了基礎。

The attack on Hyperliquid began with an unknown actor engaging in a calculated strategy. They began by shorting JELLY futures to a staggering $4.5 million while simultaneously purchasing an enormous amount of the meme coin on-chain, inflating its price to astronomical levels.

對超流動性的攻擊始於一個未知的演員，他們從事計算的策略。他們首先將果凍期貨縮短到了驚人的450萬美元，同時購買了大量的模因硬幣鏈，將其價格誇大至天文學水平。

Following this move, they engaged in a strategic self-liquidation, which ultimately forced Hyperliquid’s liquidity provider to absorb the entire $4.5 million loss.

此舉之後，他們進行了戰略性的自我運輸，最終迫使Hyplliquid的流動性提供商吸收了整個450萬美元的損失。

As the price of JELLY continued to surge, a second wallet, presumably belonging to the same actor, took a long position, setting the stage for substantial gains. In total, the exchange ended up losing over $10 million.

隨著果凍的價格繼續上漲，大概屬於同一演員的第二個錢包佔據了很長的位置，為大量收益奠定了基礎。總體而言，交易所最終損失了超過1000萬美元。

The unfolding drama took another turn when blockchain analysis revealed that the funds used in the attack passed through both OKX and Binance. This finding has led to speculations that centralized exchanges may have orchestrated the attack in a bid to destabilize Hyperliquid.

當區塊鏈分析表明襲擊中使用的資金通過OKX和Binance時，這部不斷發展的戲劇發生了另一個轉變。這一發現導致人們猜測集中交流可能已經策劃了這次攻擊，以破壞超級流動性的穩定。

These theories gained more momentum with both exchanges announcing the listing of JELLY perpetual futures around the same time the attack unfolded, further fueling concerns about the involvement of larger platforms.

這些理論在兩次交流中都宣布了攻擊展開的同時宣布果凍永久未來的列表，這一動力進一步加劇了人們對較大平台參與的擔憂。

Against this backdrop of suspicion, Richard Teng's claims of compliance and transparency at Binance appear ironic, leaving many to question the company's true role in the unfolding drama.

在這種懷疑的背景下，理查德·滕（Richard Teng）對二進制的合規性和透明度的主張似乎具有諷刺意味，因此許多人質疑該公司在不斷發展的戲劇中的真正作用。