Binance首席执行官Richard Teng在透明度上承诺，因为怀疑超流动攻击坐骑

但是，这一主张的时机提出了重大问题，因为它与怀疑Binance可能涉及对超流动的攻击有关

In a recent interview, Binance CEO Richard Teng made a strong assertion of the company's commitment to transparency, security, and compliance. However, the timing of this statement has raised significant questions, especially in light of a recent crypto drama that has seen some in the community openly discuss the possibility of Binance being involved in an attack on a decentralized exchange.

在最近的一次采访中，Binance首席执行官Richard Teng对公司对透明，安全和合规性的承诺做出了强烈的主张。但是，这一说法的时机提出了重大问题，尤其是鉴于最近的加密戏剧，社区中的一些人公开讨论了二手持续事件参与对分散交流的攻击的可能性。

This assertion comes amid rising suspicions within the crypto community that Binance might have been involved in an attack on Hyperliquid, a decentralized exchange platform. Some members of the community believe that Hyperliquid poses a potential threat to the dominance of centralized exchanges, setting the stage for what could be described as a "crypto proxy war."

这一断言是由于加密社区内的怀疑提高，即binance可能参与了对分散的交换平台Hyperliquid的攻击。该社区的一些成员认为，超流动性对集中交流的统治地位构成了潜在的威胁，为被称为“加密代理战争”的舞台奠定了基础。

The attack on Hyperliquid began with an unknown actor engaging in a calculated strategy. They began by shorting JELLY futures to a staggering $4.5 million while simultaneously purchasing an enormous amount of the meme coin on-chain, inflating its price to astronomical levels.

对超流动性的攻击始于一个未知的演员，他们从事计算的策略。他们首先将果冻期货缩短到了惊人的450万美元，同时购买了大量的模因硬币链，将其价格夸大至天文学水平。

Following this move, they engaged in a strategic self-liquidation, which ultimately forced Hyperliquid’s liquidity provider to absorb the entire $4.5 million loss.

此举之后，他们进行了战略性的自我运输，最终迫使Hyplliquid的流动性提供商吸收了整个450万美元的损失。

As the price of JELLY continued to surge, a second wallet, presumably belonging to the same actor, took a long position, setting the stage for substantial gains. In total, the exchange ended up losing over $10 million.

随着果冻的价格继续上涨，大概属于同一演员的第二个钱包占据了很长的位置，为大量收益奠定了基础。总体而言，交易所最终损失了超过1000万美元。

The unfolding drama took another turn when blockchain analysis revealed that the funds used in the attack passed through both OKX and Binance. This finding has led to speculations that centralized exchanges may have orchestrated the attack in a bid to destabilize Hyperliquid.

当区块链分析表明袭击中使用的资金通过OKX和Binance时，这部不断发展的戏剧发生了另一个转变。这一发现导致人们猜测集中交流可能已经策划了这次攻击，以破坏超级流动性的稳定。

These theories gained more momentum with both exchanges announcing the listing of JELLY perpetual futures around the same time the attack unfolded, further fueling concerns about the involvement of larger platforms.

这些理论在两次交流中都宣布了攻击展开的同时宣布果冻永久未来的列表，这一动力进一步加剧了人们对较大平台参与的担忧。

Against this backdrop of suspicion, Richard Teng's claims of compliance and transparency at Binance appear ironic, leaving many to question the company's true role in the unfolding drama.

在这种怀疑的背景下，理查德·滕（Richard Teng）对二进制的合规性和透明度的主张似乎具有讽刺意味，因此许多人质疑该公司在不断发展的戏剧中的真正作用。