Capitalisation boursière: $2.6846T -1.050%
Volume(24h): $131.0024B 66.150%
  • Capitalisation boursière: $2.6846T -1.050%
  • Volume(24h): $131.0024B 66.150%
  • Indice de peur et de cupidité:
  • Capitalisation boursière: $2.6846T -1.050%
Cryptos
Les sujets
Cryptospedia
Nouvelles
Cryptosopique
Vidéos
Top nouvelles
Cryptos
Les sujets
Cryptospedia
Nouvelles
Cryptosopique
Vidéos
bitcoin
bitcoin

$83571.608249 USD

-1.38%

ethereum
ethereum

$1826.028236 USD

-3.02%

tether
tether

$0.999839 USD

-0.01%

xrp
xrp

$2.053149 USD

-2.48%

bnb
bnb

$601.140115 USD

-0.44%

solana
solana

$120.357332 USD

-3.79%

usd-coin
usd-coin

$0.999833 USD

-0.02%

dogecoin
dogecoin

$0.166175 USD

-3.43%

cardano
cardano

$0.652521 USD

-3.00%

tron
tron

$0.236809 USD

-0.59%

toncoin
toncoin

$3.785339 USD

-5.02%

chainlink
chainlink

$13.253231 USD

-3.91%

unus-sed-leo
unus-sed-leo

$9.397427 USD

-0.19%

stellar
stellar

$0.266444 USD

-1.00%

sui
sui

$2.409007 USD

1.15%

Articles d’actualité sur les crypto-monnaies

Partial Victory for Kim Nam-guk in Defamation Case

Jan 12, 2025 at 09:02 am

Partial Victory for Kim Nam-guk in Defamation Case

A former member of the Democratic Party of Korea has won partial victory in a defamation case against an ex-youth chief of the People Power Party.

Kim Nam-guk, a former lawmaker, had filed a damages suit against Jang Ye-chan, who had accused him of ‘illegal coin trading’ during a radio interview last year.

On Friday, Han Woong-hee, a judge at the Seoul Southern District Court, ruled in part to accept Kim’s claim.

The court ordered Jang to pay Kim 30 million won ($23,000) in damages, less than the 50 million won that Kim had originally claimed.

“According to broadcasting review regulations, one should not express someone as a criminal until a final court judgment is made,” the court noted.

“Nevertheless, the defendant rejected the opportunity to correct his statements limited by the host and further specified false facts.”

The court added, “Even if there are controversies regarding the plaintiff’s virtual asset holdings, transaction timing, and volume, or if the plaintiff’s explanations regarding the controversies are unclear, it is not permissible to defame the plaintiff by recklessly claiming he committed a crime without any basis.”

In May last year, Jang had taken to social network service posts and a radio interview to raise suspicions that Kim had engaged in illegal coin trading by preemptively knowing listing information.

Kim filed a damages lawsuit against Jang in September that year, and also filed defamation charges against Jang and fellow party member Kim Sung-won for false statements, but these were concluded with no charges.

The verdict on Kim’s charge of obstruction of official duties by deceit is expected on the 10th of next month.

Kim is accused of concealing significant profits from coin investments during the 2021-2022 National Assembly property reports, thereby obstructing the National Assembly Public Official Ethics Committee’s review of property change details.

Clause de non-responsabilité:info@kdj.com

Les informations fournies ne constituent pas des conseils commerciaux. kdj.com n’assume aucune responsabilité pour les investissements effectués sur la base des informations fournies dans cet article. Les crypto-monnaies sont très volatiles et il est fortement recommandé d’investir avec prudence après une recherche approfondie!

Si vous pensez que le contenu utilisé sur ce site Web porte atteinte à vos droits d’auteur, veuillez nous contacter immédiatement (info@kdj.com) et nous le supprimerons dans les plus brefs délais.

Autres articles publiés sur Apr 03, 2025