僵尸代币：深入研究福布斯有争议的评估

福布斯将各种区块链网络贴上“僵尸代币”的标签，引发了投资者对其可行性的争论。尽管文章声称效用极小，但包括 XRP、ADA 和 XLM 在内的这些代币在过去一个月中都面临着价值的大幅下跌。投资者在持有或抛售这些资产之间左右为难，一些代币损失超过 20%，而其他代币（如 Filecoin）的损失高达 39.2%。

Zombie Tokens: A Deeper Dive into Forbes' Controversial Assessment

僵尸代币：深入探讨福布斯有争议的评估

Since Forbes' scathing exposé on 20 "zombie" blockchains, investors have been left grappling with the question of whether to hold or dump these tokens. While some have experienced a significant decline in value, others have remained resilient, prompting a closer examination of the underlying factors driving their performance.

自从《福布斯》严厉曝光 20 个“僵尸”区块链以来，投资者一直在纠结是持有还是抛售这些代币的问题。虽然一些公司的价值大幅下跌，但另一些公司仍保持弹性，促使人们更仔细地审视推动其业绩的潜在因素。

Forbes' Critique and the Market's Response

福布斯的批评和市场的反应

In its article, Forbes alleged that these blockchains, including XRP, Cardano, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, have little utility beyond speculative trading and have ascended the market cap charts primarily due to hype and speculation. The article further insinuated that these networks lack substantial development and growth, echoing concerns that have long plagued the cryptocurrency industry.

福布斯在其文章中声称，这些区块链，包括 XRP、Cardano、Litecoin 和 Bitcoin Cash，除了投机交易之外几乎没有什么用处，并且主要由于炒作和投机而在市值排行榜上攀升。文章进一步暗示这些网络缺乏实质性的发展和增长，这呼应了长期以来困扰加密货币行业的担忧。

The market's response has been mixed, with most of the tokens on Forbes' list experiencing a dip in value. Some, such as Filecoin and Stacks, have lost over 30% of their worth in the past month. However, others, like Ethereum Classic and Stellar, have exhibited relative stability or even modest gains.

市场反应不一，福布斯排行榜上的大多数代币都经历了价值下跌。 Filecoin 和 Stacks 等一些货币在过去一个月里损失了超过 30% 的价值。然而，以太坊经典和恒星币等其他加密货币则表现出相对稳定甚至适度增长。

Assessing the Validity of Forbes' Claims

评估福布斯声明的有效性

While Forbes' article raised valid concerns about the need for mainstream utility and adoption in the blockchain space, it also overgeneralized and unfairly dismissed the efforts and progress of some of the named projects.

虽然《福布斯》的文章对区块链领域主流实用性和采用的必要性提出了合理的担忧，但它也过度概括和不公平地忽视了一些指定项目的努力和进展。

For instance, XRP, Cardano, and Stellar all boast active ecosystems that have produced numerous decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). While these ecosystems may not rival Ethereum in terms of scale, they have demonstrated significant traction and innovation.

例如，XRP、Cardano 和 Stellar 都拥有活跃的生态系统，产生了大量去中心化应用程序 (dApp)、去中心化金融 (DeFi) 平台和不可替代代币 (NFT)。虽然这些生态系统在规模上可能无法与以太坊相媲美，但它们已经表现出了巨大的吸引力和创新力。

Furthermore, networks like Flow, which Forbes included in its zombie list, have achieved impressive results in the NFT market, ranking among the top performers in terms of sales volume. This suggests that utility and adoption are not solely confined to a select few blockchain protocols.

此外，福布斯列入僵尸名单的Flow等网络在NFT市场上也取得了骄人的成绩，在销量方面名列前茅。这表明实用性和采用不仅仅局限于少数几个区块链协议。

The Dilemma for Investors: Hold or Dump?

投资者的困境：持有还是抛售？

The decision of whether to hold or dump the so-called zombie tokens remains a complex one. While some have experienced significant declines, others have shown resilience and potential for growth. Investors who understand the risks and uncertainties inherent in the cryptocurrency market may consider holding or even selectively accumulating these tokens.

是否持有或抛售所谓的僵尸代币的决定仍然是一个复杂的决定。虽然有些经历了显着下降，但另一些却表现出了韧性和增长潜力。了解加密货币市场固有风险和不确定性的投资者可能会考虑持有甚至选择性积累这些代币。

However, those who prioritize mainstream utility and adoption may opt to reallocate their investments towards projects that have a clear path to mass adoption and real-world impact. Ultimately, the decision depends on each investor's individual risk tolerance, investment horizon, and assessment of the long-term prospects of these tokens.

然而，那些优先考虑主流实用性和采用的人可能会选择将投资重新分配给那些具有明确的大规模采用和现实世界影响路径的项目。最终，决定取决于每个投资者的个人风险承受能力、投资期限以及对这些代币长期前景的评估。

Addressing the Lack of Mainstream Adoption

解决缺乏主流采用的问题

Forbes' critique highlights the fundamental challenge that blockchains face in achieving mainstream adoption. Despite the proliferation of projects and the billions of dollars invested, many blockchain networks struggle to connect with non-crypto users and demonstrate tangible benefits that transcend speculation.

福布斯的批评凸显了区块链在实现主流采用方面面临的根本挑战。尽管项目激增且投资数十亿美元，但许多区块链网络仍难​​以与非加密用户建立联系，并展示出超越猜测的切实好处。

Addressing this issue requires a concerted effort from blockchain developers, businesses, and policymakers to create user-friendly applications, bridge the gap between crypto and traditional financial systems, and implement clear regulatory frameworks that foster innovation while protecting consumers.

解决这个问题需要区块链开发商、企业和政策制定者共同努力，创建用户友好的应用程序，弥合加密货币和传统金融系统之间的差距，并实施明确的监管框架，以促进创新，同时保护消费者。

Conclusion

结论

The Forbes article on zombie tokens has sparked a much-needed conversation about the challenges and opportunities facing the blockchain industry. While some of the criticisms were valid, it is important to avoid sweeping generalizations and acknowledge the progress that has been made by many blockchain projects.

福布斯关于僵尸代币的文章引发了关于区块链行业面临的挑战和机遇的急需对话。虽然一些批评是有道理的，但重要的是要避免一概而论，并承认许多区块链项目所取得的进展。

Investors should carefully weigh the risks and potential rewards of holding or dumping zombie tokens, considering their individual investment goals and time horizons. The future of these tokens will ultimately be determined by their ability to evolve, connect with a broader audience, and demonstrate genuine utility and value in the real world.

投资者应考虑其个人投资目标和时间范围，仔细权衡持有或抛售僵尸代币的风险和潜在回报。这些代币的未来最终将取决于它们的发展能力、与更广泛受众的联系以及在现实世界中展示真正实用性和价值的能力。