殭屍代幣：深入研究福布斯有爭議的評估

福布斯將各種區塊鏈網路貼上「殭屍代幣」的標籤，引發了投資者對其可行性的爭論。儘管文章聲稱效用極小，但包括 XRP、ADA 和 XLM 在內的這些代幣在過去一個月中都面臨著價值的大幅下跌。投資者在持有或拋售這些資產之間左右為難，一些代幣損失超過 20%，而其他代幣（如 Filecoin）的損失高達 39.2%。

Zombie Tokens: A Deeper Dive into Forbes' Controversial Assessment

殭屍代幣：深入探討福布斯有爭議的評估

Since Forbes' scathing exposé on 20 "zombie" blockchains, investors have been left grappling with the question of whether to hold or dump these tokens. While some have experienced a significant decline in value, others have remained resilient, prompting a closer examination of the underlying factors driving their performance.

自從《富比士》嚴厲曝光 20 個「殭屍」區塊鏈以來，投資人一直在糾結是持有還是拋售這些代幣的問題。雖然有些公司的價值大幅下跌，但有些公司仍保持彈性，促使人們更仔細地審視推動其績效的潛在因素。

Forbes' Critique and the Market's Response

福布斯的批評和市場的反應

In its article, Forbes alleged that these blockchains, including XRP, Cardano, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash, have little utility beyond speculative trading and have ascended the market cap charts primarily due to hype and speculation. The article further insinuated that these networks lack substantial development and growth, echoing concerns that have long plagued the cryptocurrency industry.

福布斯在其文章中聲稱，這些區塊鏈，包括 XRP、Cardano、Litecoin 和 Bitcoin Cash，除了投機交易之外幾乎沒有什麼用處，並且主要由於炒作和投機而在市值排行榜上攀升。文章進一步暗示這些網路缺乏實質的發展和成長，這呼應了長期以來困擾加密貨幣產業的擔憂。

The market's response has been mixed, with most of the tokens on Forbes' list experiencing a dip in value. Some, such as Filecoin and Stacks, have lost over 30% of their worth in the past month. However, others, like Ethereum Classic and Stellar, have exhibited relative stability or even modest gains.

市場反應不一，福布斯排行榜上的大多數代幣都經歷了價值下跌。 Filecoin 和 Stacks 等一些貨幣在過去一個月裡損失了超過 30% 的價值。然而，以太坊經典和恆星幣等其他加密貨幣則表現出相對穩定甚至適度增長。

Assessing the Validity of Forbes' Claims

評估福布斯聲明的有效性

While Forbes' article raised valid concerns about the need for mainstream utility and adoption in the blockchain space, it also overgeneralized and unfairly dismissed the efforts and progress of some of the named projects.

雖然《富比士》的文章對區塊鏈領域主流實用性和採用的必要性提出了合理的擔憂，但它也過度概括和不公平地忽視了一些指定項目的努力和進展。

For instance, XRP, Cardano, and Stellar all boast active ecosystems that have produced numerous decentralized applications (dApps), decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). While these ecosystems may not rival Ethereum in terms of scale, they have demonstrated significant traction and innovation.

例如，XRP、Cardano 和 Stellar 都擁有活躍的生態系統，產生了大量去中心化應用程式 (dApp)、去中心化金融 (DeFi) 平台和不可替代代幣 (NFT)。雖然這些生態系統在規模上可能無法與以太坊相媲美，但它們已經表現出了巨大的吸引力和創新。

Furthermore, networks like Flow, which Forbes included in its zombie list, have achieved impressive results in the NFT market, ranking among the top performers in terms of sales volume. This suggests that utility and adoption are not solely confined to a select few blockchain protocols.

此外，福布斯列入殭屍名單的Flow等網絡在NFT市場上也取得了驕人的成績，在銷售方面名列前茅。這表明實用性和採用不僅限於少數幾個區塊鏈協議。

The Dilemma for Investors: Hold or Dump?

投資人的困境：持有還是拋售？

The decision of whether to hold or dump the so-called zombie tokens remains a complex one. While some have experienced significant declines, others have shown resilience and potential for growth. Investors who understand the risks and uncertainties inherent in the cryptocurrency market may consider holding or even selectively accumulating these tokens.

是否持有或拋售所謂的殭屍代幣的決定仍然是一個複雜的決定。雖然有些經歷了顯著下降，但有些卻表現出了韌性和成長潛力。了解加密貨幣市場固有風險和不確定性的投資者可能會考慮持有甚至選擇性累積這些代幣。

However, those who prioritize mainstream utility and adoption may opt to reallocate their investments towards projects that have a clear path to mass adoption and real-world impact. Ultimately, the decision depends on each investor's individual risk tolerance, investment horizon, and assessment of the long-term prospects of these tokens.

然而，那些優先考慮主流實用性和採用的人可能會選擇將投資重新分配給那些具有明確的大規模採用和現實世界影響路徑的項目。最終，決定取決於每個投資者的個人風險承受能力、投資期限以及對這些代幣長期前景的評估。

Addressing the Lack of Mainstream Adoption

解決缺乏主流採用的問題

Forbes' critique highlights the fundamental challenge that blockchains face in achieving mainstream adoption. Despite the proliferation of projects and the billions of dollars invested, many blockchain networks struggle to connect with non-crypto users and demonstrate tangible benefits that transcend speculation.

福布斯的批評凸顯了區塊鏈在實現主流採用方面面臨的根本挑戰。儘管項目激增且投資數十億美元，但許多區塊鏈網路仍難以與非加密用戶建立聯繫，並展示出超越猜測的實際好處。

Addressing this issue requires a concerted effort from blockchain developers, businesses, and policymakers to create user-friendly applications, bridge the gap between crypto and traditional financial systems, and implement clear regulatory frameworks that foster innovation while protecting consumers.

解決這個問題需要區塊鏈開發人員、企業和政策制定者共同努力，創建用戶友好的應用程序，彌合加密貨幣和傳統金融系統之間的差距，並實施明確的監管框架，以促進創新，同時保護消費者。

Conclusion

結論

The Forbes article on zombie tokens has sparked a much-needed conversation about the challenges and opportunities facing the blockchain industry. While some of the criticisms were valid, it is important to avoid sweeping generalizations and acknowledge the progress that has been made by many blockchain projects.

《富比士》關於殭屍代幣的文章引發了關於區塊鏈產業面臨的挑戰和機會的急需對話。雖然有些批評是有道理的，但重要的是要避免一概而論，並承認許多區塊鏈專案所取得的進展。

Investors should carefully weigh the risks and potential rewards of holding or dumping zombie tokens, considering their individual investment goals and time horizons. The future of these tokens will ultimately be determined by their ability to evolve, connect with a broader audience, and demonstrate genuine utility and value in the real world.

投資者應考慮其個人投資目標和時間範圍，仔細權衡持有或拋售殭屍代幣的風險和潛在回報。這些代幣的未來最終將取決於它們的發展能力、與更廣泛受眾的聯繫以及在現實世界中展示真正實用性和價值的能力。