纽约一名法官裁定，纽约大多数纽约总检察长莱蒂蒂亚·詹姆斯的民事证券欺诈诉讼针对加密货币公司数字货币集团（DCG）

2023年，詹姆斯起诉詹姆斯起诉DCG及其首席执行官巴里·席伯特（Barry Silbert）

A New York judge has ruled that the majority of New York Attorney General Letitia James’s civil securities fraud suit against Digital Currency Group (DCG) and two of its executives can proceed to trial.

纽约法官裁定，纽约总检察长莱蒂蒂亚·詹姆斯（Letitia James）对数字货币集团（DCG）的民事证券欺诈诉讼及其两名高管可以进行审判。

The judge presiding over the case disagreed with claims from DCG and its CEO Barry Silbert, and now-bankrupt lending firm Genesis Global Capital and its former CEO Michael Moro, that the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) had failed to state a claim.

主持此案的法官不同意DCG及其首席执行官Barry Silbert的索赔，以及现已破产的贷款公司Genesis Global Capital及其前首席执行官Michael Moro，即总检察长（OAG）办公室未能陈述索赔。

The case centers around a gaping $1 billion hole in Genesis’s balance sheet which was caused by the wipe-out of Singapore-based crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) in 2022. James said that DCG and Genesis made “false assurances” on social media that DCG had absorbed Genesis’s losses from 3AC’s implosion when, in fact, they had just papered over the hole with a promissory note, pleading to pay Genesis $1.1 billion over 10 years at a 1% interest rate.

该案件集中在创世纪的资产负债表中，围绕一个巨大的漏洞，这是由于2022年在基于新加坡的加密货币对冲基金（3AC）的擦拭引起10年以1％的利率，11亿美元。

While DCG has adamantly maintained that the promissory note was legitimate, James’s suit claimed that DCG has “never made a single payment under the Note.”

尽管DCG坚持认为期票是合法的，但詹姆斯的诉讼声称DCG“从未根据票据进行一次付款。”

While Gemini and Genesis both settled with the OAG, DCG, Silbert and Moro have fought them tooth and nail. Last spring, DCG and both executives filed motions to dismiss the suit, alleging that the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) had failed to state a claim — essentially arguing that they were not selling securities and thus should not be sued under New York State securities laws.

双子座和创世记都与OAG，DCG，Silbert和Moro一起定居，与他们抗衡了牙齿和指甲。去年春季，DCG和两位高管提出了驳回诉讼的动议，指控总检察长（OAG）未能陈述索赔 - 基本上争辩说他们没有出售证券，因此不应根据纽约州证券法诉讼。

But the judge presiding over the case disagreed in her Friday ruling, writing that the OAG had, at least at the current stage of the case, adequately alleged that the Gemini Earn program — the now-defunct Gemini lending product that went belly-up in November 2022 and which sits at the center of James’s case — was a security.

但是主持此案的法官在周五的裁决中不同意，他写道，至少在目前的案件阶段，OAG充分声称双子座的赚钱计划 - 现在已倒闭的Gemini Lending产品，该产品于2022年11月忙于忙碌，并且是詹姆斯案中心的劳动。

Crane did, however, agree to toss out two of James’s claims against DCG, Moro and Silbert — one claim under New York’s Executive Law that they engaged in a scheme to defraud in the first degree, and another that they engaged in a conspiracy in the fifth degree — ruling that those claims were duplicative.

但是，克雷恩（Crane）确实同意抛弃詹姆斯针对DCG，Moro和Silbert的两项主张，这是根据纽约执行法的一项主张，即他们从事一级违反一级违约的计划，而另一项则说，他们在第五学位上进行了阴谋 - 裁定这些主张是重复的。

Though Crane ruled the case can proceed, DCG said it isn’t done fighting.

尽管Crane裁定该案可以进行，但DCG表示，没有进行战斗。

“As we have stated from the beginning, the allegations against DCG are a thin web of innuendo, mischaracterizations, and unsupported conclusions,” a spokesperson for DCG told CoinDesk. “We’re encouraged by the judge’s dismissal of the New York Attorney General’s most outrageous claims based on alleged violations of criminal fraud and conspiracy statutes. We will continue to fight this baseless lawsuit as we remain focused on our mission in support of the digital assets industry.”

DCG的发言人告诉Coindesk：“正如我们从一开始就说，针对DCG的指控是一个薄薄的影射，错误示范和不支持的结论。” “基于涉嫌违反犯罪欺诈和阴谋法规的行为，法官驳回了纽约总检察长最残酷的主张的鼓舞。我们将继续抗击这一毫无根据的诉讼，因为我们仍然专注于支持数字资产行业的使命。”