紐約一名法官裁定，紐約大多數紐約總檢察長萊蒂蒂亞·詹姆斯的民事證券欺詐訴訟針對加密貨幣公司數字貨幣集團（DCG）

2023年，詹姆斯起訴詹姆斯起訴DCG及其首席執行官巴里·席伯特（Barry Silbert）

A New York judge has ruled that the majority of New York Attorney General Letitia James’s civil securities fraud suit against Digital Currency Group (DCG) and two of its executives can proceed to trial.

紐約法官裁定，紐約總檢察長萊蒂蒂亞·詹姆斯（Letitia James）對數字貨幣集團（DCG）的民事證券欺詐訴訟及其兩名高管可以進行審判。

The judge presiding over the case disagreed with claims from DCG and its CEO Barry Silbert, and now-bankrupt lending firm Genesis Global Capital and its former CEO Michael Moro, that the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) had failed to state a claim.

主持此案的法官不同意DCG及其首席執行官Barry Silbert的索賠，以及現已破產的貸款公司Genesis Global Capital及其前首席執行官Michael Moro，即總檢察長（OAG）辦公室未能陳述索賠。

The case centers around a gaping $1 billion hole in Genesis’s balance sheet which was caused by the wipe-out of Singapore-based crypto hedge fund Three Arrows Capital (3AC) in 2022. James said that DCG and Genesis made “false assurances” on social media that DCG had absorbed Genesis’s losses from 3AC’s implosion when, in fact, they had just papered over the hole with a promissory note, pleading to pay Genesis $1.1 billion over 10 years at a 1% interest rate.

該案件集中在創世紀的資產負債表中，圍繞一個巨大的漏洞，這是由於2022年在基於新加坡的加密貨幣對沖基金（3AC）的擦拭引起10年以1％的利率，11億美元。

While DCG has adamantly maintained that the promissory note was legitimate, James’s suit claimed that DCG has “never made a single payment under the Note.”

儘管DCG堅持認為期票是合法的，但詹姆斯的訴訟聲稱DCG“從未根據票據進行一次付款。”

While Gemini and Genesis both settled with the OAG, DCG, Silbert and Moro have fought them tooth and nail. Last spring, DCG and both executives filed motions to dismiss the suit, alleging that the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) had failed to state a claim — essentially arguing that they were not selling securities and thus should not be sued under New York State securities laws.

雙子座和創世記都與OAG，DCG，Silbert和Moro一起定居，與他們抗衡了牙齒和指甲。去年春季，DCG和兩位高管提出了駁回訴訟的動議，指控總檢察長（OAG）未能陳述索賠 - 基本上爭辯說他們沒有出售證券，因此不應根據紐約州證券法訴訟。

But the judge presiding over the case disagreed in her Friday ruling, writing that the OAG had, at least at the current stage of the case, adequately alleged that the Gemini Earn program — the now-defunct Gemini lending product that went belly-up in November 2022 and which sits at the center of James’s case — was a security.

但是主持此案的法官在周五的裁決中不同意，他寫道，至少在目前的案件階段，OAG充分聲稱雙子座的賺錢計劃 - 現在已倒閉的Gemini Lending產品，該產品於2022年11月忙於忙碌，並且是詹姆斯案中心的勞動。

Crane did, however, agree to toss out two of James’s claims against DCG, Moro and Silbert — one claim under New York’s Executive Law that they engaged in a scheme to defraud in the first degree, and another that they engaged in a conspiracy in the fifth degree — ruling that those claims were duplicative.

但是，克雷恩（Crane）確實同意拋棄詹姆斯針對DCG，Moro和Silbert的兩項主張，這是根據紐約執行法的一項主張，即他們從事一級違反一級違約的計劃，而另一項則說，他們在第五學位上進行了陰謀 - 裁定這些主張是重複的。

Though Crane ruled the case can proceed, DCG said it isn’t done fighting.

儘管Crane裁定該案可以進行，但DCG表示，沒有進行戰鬥。

“As we have stated from the beginning, the allegations against DCG are a thin web of innuendo, mischaracterizations, and unsupported conclusions,” a spokesperson for DCG told CoinDesk. “We’re encouraged by the judge’s dismissal of the New York Attorney General’s most outrageous claims based on alleged violations of criminal fraud and conspiracy statutes. We will continue to fight this baseless lawsuit as we remain focused on our mission in support of the digital assets industry.”

DCG的發言人告訴Coindesk：“正如我們從一開始就說，針對DCG的指控是一個薄薄的影射，錯誤示範和不支持的結論。” “基於涉嫌違反犯罪欺詐和陰謀法規的行為，法官駁回了紐約總檢察長最殘酷的主張的鼓舞。我們將繼續抗擊這一毫無根據的訴訟，因為我們仍然專注於支持數字資產行業的使命。”