WikiLeaks声称将比特币兄弟带入螺旋形，说服了政府帮助资助反克里普托的宣传。

Wikileaks在X上的一篇文章中说，批评其前任朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）主管的作者是由政府秘密资助的。

WikiLeaks has made a claim that an author who criticized the organization's former head, Julian Assange, received substantial funding from the government to the tune of at least $80,000. This revelation has sparked a flurry of reactions among Bitcoin enthusiasts, who are convinced that this is part of a larger effort by the federal government to discredit cryptocurrencies.

Wikileaks声称批评该组织的前任负责人朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）的作者从政府获得了大量资金，至少为80,000美元。这一启示引发了比特币爱好者的一系列反应，他们坚信这是联邦政府更加努力抹黑加密货币的一部分。

In his book titled “Cyberlibertarianism: The Right Wing Politics of Digital Technology,” the author, David Golumbia, who passed away before the book's publication, referred to Assange as a “proto-Nazi political provocateur.” The book also included a section that likened cryptocurrency to a protofascist movement with far-right connections.

作者戴维·戈伦比亚（David Golumbia）在他的书《网络伯特主义：数字技术的右翼政治》中的书中，他在该书出版之前就去世了，称阿桑奇为“原始纳粹政治挑衅者”。这本书还包括一个将加密货币与原右连接的原始运动相比喻的部分。

Prior to writing the book on cyberlibertarianism, Golumbia had also authored another work called “The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism,” which asserted that cryptocurrencies were likely to be adopted by far-right extremists owing to their inherent rejection of government involvement.

在撰写有关网络自由主义的书之前，Golumbia还撰写了另一项名为“比特币政治：软件为右翼极端主义”的作品，该作品断言，由于政府固有的拒绝，极端的极端分子可能会采用加密货币参与。

The claim made by WikiLeaks attempts to link the author to the recent wave of right-wing enthusiasm over USAID and government propaganda. However, the specific origins of the grant that WikiLeaks alleges Golumbia received remain unclear.

Wikileaks的主张试图将作者与最近对美国国际开发署和政府宣传的右翼热情联系起来。但是，Wikileaks声称Golumbia收到的赠款的具体起源尚不清楚。

The University of Minnesota Press, which published Golumbia's book, receives funding from a variety of government grants and subsidies, as well as contributions from other organizations. Additionally, Virginia Commonwealth University, where Golumbia was employed before his passing, also acknowledges receiving government funding.

明尼苏达大学出版的哥伦比亚大学出版社（Golumbia's Book）获得了各种政府赠款和补贴的资金，以及其他组织的贡献。此外，弗吉尼亚州联邦大学（Golumbia）在去世前就在那里受雇，他也承认获得了政府资金。

The Daily Dot has not been able to independently verify the existence of the specific grant that WikiLeaks claims Golumbia received. Nevertheless, crypto enthusiasts have swiftly mobilized to denounce Golumbia's work based on this unverified claim of federal funding.

每日点无法独立验证WikiLeaks声称Golumbia收到的特定赠款的存在。尽管如此，加密爱好者迅速动员起来，基于这种未经证实的联邦资金主张谴责Golumbia的工作。

“#USAID funded medias to spread anti-Libertarian propaganda. We knew this already…we now have the receipts to prove it,” remarked one individual in response to the news.

#usaid资助的媒体传播反自由主义者的宣传。我们已经知道这一点了……我们现在有了证明这一点的收据。”一个人回应新闻。

A CEO in the crypto industry also expressed outrage over the revelation. “So apparently, USAID is funding the production of propaganda that says Bitcoin is right-wing extremism,” fumed the head of Cardano, a prominent cryptocurrency platform. “I'm so over this garbage.”

加密行业的首席执行官也对启示表示愤怒。 “很明显，美国国际开发署正在资助宣传的生产，说比特币是右翼极端主义。”杰出的加密货币平台Cardano的负责人说。 “我在这个垃圾上真是太好了。”

On various crypto blogs, articles have emerged calling upon President Donald Trump and Elon Musk to intervene and rectify this alleged government smear campaign against digital currencies.

在各种加密博客上，出现了文章，呼吁唐纳德·特朗普总统和埃隆·马斯克干预和纠正这项涉嫌针对数字货币的政府涂片运动。

“The inclusion of Golumbia's work in academic settings without a critical examination of its funding sources ... highlights a worrying trend within government, which the new Trump admin is trying to address, in particular with Elon Musk and the DOGE agency's mission,” wrote one crypto news outlet.

“在没有对其资金来源进行批判性检查的情况下，将古兰比亚的工作包括在学术环境中……突出了政府内部令人担忧的趋势，新的特朗普管理员正在尝试解决这一问题，尤其是与埃隆·马斯克（Elon Musk）和总督机构的使命。”一个加密新闻媒体。

However, despite the grandiose claims and impassioned reactions, much like several previous right-wing outbursts regarding government funding, the definitive proof of any substantial scandal appears to be notably absent from the discussion.

然而，尽管有宏伟的主张和热情洋溢的反应，就像以前的几次右翼爆发有关政府资金的爆发，任何实质性丑闻的明确证明似乎都显然是在讨论中。

In the Reddit community r/btc, users who highlighted the big reveal as evidence of a clandestine government agenda were met with a wave of skepticism from fellow members of the community.

在Reddit社区R/BTC中，强调大揭示的用户是秘密政府议程的证据，遭到了社区同胞的怀疑浪潮。

“Is there a part 2 to this article?” inquired one user. “Or anything that specified how USAID is related here? The WikiLeaks post says Golumbia received $80k in US grants … I don't see how ‘received grants’ translates to ‘received money from USAID’ but maybe I'm missing something here?”

“本文有第2部分吗？”询问一个用户。 “还是在这里指定美国国际开发署有何关系的任何内容？ Wikileaks帖子说，Golumbia获得了8万美元的美国赠款……我看不到“收到的赠款”如何转化为“从USAID收到的钱”，但也许我在这里错过了一些东西？”