WikiLeaks聲稱將比特幣兄弟帶入螺旋形，說服了政府幫助資助反克里普託的宣傳。

Wikileaks在X上的一篇文章中說，批評其前任朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）主管的作者是由政府秘密資助的。

WikiLeaks has made a claim that an author who criticized the organization's former head, Julian Assange, received substantial funding from the government to the tune of at least $80,000. This revelation has sparked a flurry of reactions among Bitcoin enthusiasts, who are convinced that this is part of a larger effort by the federal government to discredit cryptocurrencies.

Wikileaks聲稱批評該組織的前任負責人朱利安·阿桑奇（Julian Assange）的作者從政府獲得了大量資金，至少為80,000美元。這一啟示引發了比特幣愛好者的一系列反應，他們堅信這是聯邦政府更加努力抹黑加密貨幣的一部分。

In his book titled “Cyberlibertarianism: The Right Wing Politics of Digital Technology,” the author, David Golumbia, who passed away before the book's publication, referred to Assange as a “proto-Nazi political provocateur.” The book also included a section that likened cryptocurrency to a protofascist movement with far-right connections.

作者戴維·戈倫比亞（David Golumbia）在他的書《網絡伯特主義：數字技術的右翼政治》中的書中，他在該書出版之前就去世了，稱阿桑奇為“原始納粹政治挑釁者”。這本書還包括一個將加密貨幣與原右連接的原始運動相比喻的部分。

Prior to writing the book on cyberlibertarianism, Golumbia had also authored another work called “The Politics of Bitcoin: Software as Right-Wing Extremism,” which asserted that cryptocurrencies were likely to be adopted by far-right extremists owing to their inherent rejection of government involvement.

在撰寫有關網絡自由主義的書之前，Golumbia還撰寫了另一項名為“比特幣政治：軟件為右翼極端主義”的作品，該作品斷言，由於政府固有的拒絕，極端的極端分子可能會採用加密貨幣參與。

The claim made by WikiLeaks attempts to link the author to the recent wave of right-wing enthusiasm over USAID and government propaganda. However, the specific origins of the grant that WikiLeaks alleges Golumbia received remain unclear.

Wikileaks的主張試圖將作者與最近對美國國際開發署和政府宣傳的右翼熱情聯繫起來。但是，Wikileaks聲稱Golumbia收到的贈款的具體起源尚不清楚。

The University of Minnesota Press, which published Golumbia's book, receives funding from a variety of government grants and subsidies, as well as contributions from other organizations. Additionally, Virginia Commonwealth University, where Golumbia was employed before his passing, also acknowledges receiving government funding.

明尼蘇達大學出版的哥倫比亞大學出版社（Golumbia's Book）獲得了各種政府贈款和補貼的資金，以及其他組織的貢獻。此外，弗吉尼亞州聯邦大學（Golumbia）在去世前就在那裡受僱，他也承認獲得了政府資金。

The Daily Dot has not been able to independently verify the existence of the specific grant that WikiLeaks claims Golumbia received. Nevertheless, crypto enthusiasts have swiftly mobilized to denounce Golumbia's work based on this unverified claim of federal funding.

每日點無法獨立驗證WikiLeaks聲稱Golumbia收到的特定贈款的存在。儘管如此，加密愛好者迅速動員起來，基於這種未經證實的聯邦資金主張譴責Golumbia的工作。

“#USAID funded medias to spread anti-Libertarian propaganda. We knew this already…we now have the receipts to prove it,” remarked one individual in response to the news.

#usaid資助的媒體傳播反自由主義者的宣傳。我們已經知道這一點了……我們現在有了證明這一點的收據。”一個人回應新聞。

A CEO in the crypto industry also expressed outrage over the revelation. “So apparently, USAID is funding the production of propaganda that says Bitcoin is right-wing extremism,” fumed the head of Cardano, a prominent cryptocurrency platform. “I'm so over this garbage.”

加密行業的首席執行官也對啟示表示憤怒。 “很明顯，美國國際開發署正在資助宣傳的生產，說比特幣是右翼極端主義。”傑出的加密貨幣平台Cardano的負責人說。 “我在這個垃圾上真是太好了。”

On various crypto blogs, articles have emerged calling upon President Donald Trump and Elon Musk to intervene and rectify this alleged government smear campaign against digital currencies.

在各種加密博客上，出現了文章，呼籲唐納德·特朗普總統和埃隆·馬斯克乾預和糾正這項涉嫌針對數字貨幣的政府塗片運動。

“The inclusion of Golumbia's work in academic settings without a critical examination of its funding sources ... highlights a worrying trend within government, which the new Trump admin is trying to address, in particular with Elon Musk and the DOGE agency's mission,” wrote one crypto news outlet.

“在沒有對其資金來源進行批判性檢查的情況下，將古蘭比亞的工作包括在學術環境中……突出了政府內部令人擔憂的趨勢，新的特朗普管理員正在嘗試解決這一問題，尤其是與埃隆·馬斯克（Elon Musk）和總督機構的使命。”一個加密新聞媒體。

However, despite the grandiose claims and impassioned reactions, much like several previous right-wing outbursts regarding government funding, the definitive proof of any substantial scandal appears to be notably absent from the discussion.

然而，儘管有宏偉的主張和熱情洋溢的反應，就像以前的幾次右翼爆發有關政府資金的爆發，任何實質性醜聞的明確證明似乎都顯然是在討論中。

In the Reddit community r/btc, users who highlighted the big reveal as evidence of a clandestine government agenda were met with a wave of skepticism from fellow members of the community.

在Reddit社區R/BTC中，強調大揭示的用戶是秘密政府議程的證據，遭到了社區同胞的懷疑浪潮。

“Is there a part 2 to this article?” inquired one user. “Or anything that specified how USAID is related here? The WikiLeaks post says Golumbia received $80k in US grants … I don't see how ‘received grants’ translates to ‘received money from USAID’ but maybe I'm missing something here?”

“本文有第2部分嗎？”詢問一個用戶。 “還是在這裡指定美國國際開發署有何關係的任何內容？ Wikileaks帖子說，Golumbia獲得了8萬美元的美國贈款……我看不到“收到的贈款”如何轉化為“從USAID收到的錢”，但也許我在這裡錯過了一些東西？”