VC上市率：Binance Labs，占位符，YZI Labs（Binance Labs）是T0级别

再花24小时组织，努力完美！希望每个人都可以参考更详细和全面的内容！

Evan, an author and crypto enthusiast with the handle @EvanCrypto17, has been tirelessly working to provide more detailed and comprehensive content for his followers.

埃文（Evan）是The Wander @evancrypto17的作家和加密爱好者，一直在努力为他的追随者提供更详细和全面的内容。

In his previous post, he selected three exchanges—Binance, OKX, and Coinbase—and presented an analysis of the top-rated VCs based on the tokens listed on these exchanges.

在他的上一篇文章中，他选择了三个交流（Binance，Okx和Coinbase），并根据这些交易所上列出的代币进行了对顶级VCS的分析。

This time, he updated the listing rates for Bybit and Upbit and included more indicators for better statistical results.

这次，他更新了BYBIT和UPBIT的上市率，并提供了更多指标，以获得更好的统计结果。

In this edition, he added the unaccounted VCs, Bybit listing rate, Upbit listing rate, VC average listing rate, excellent VC evaluation, and more objective quantitative scores.

在此版本中，他添加了未划分的VC，BYBIT上市率，UPBIT上市率，VC平均上市率，出色的VC评估和更客观的定量分数。

The UI interface has also been designed to be more user-friendly and visually appealing.

UI界面还设计为更具用户友好和视觉吸引力。

A total of 73 VCs were included in the ranking, encompassing 35 domestic VCs, 30 foreign VCs, and 8 exchange VCs.

排名中总共包括73个VC，其中包括35个国内风险投资，30个外国VC和8个Exchange VCS。

It's important to note that this rating is based solely on the listing of tokens and does not factor in the overall strength and brand influence of the VCs.

重要的是要注意，该评级仅基于令牌的清单，而不会考虑VCS的整体强度和品牌影响。

Considering the market share, growth rate, and listing effect of Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, and Upbit exchanges, the following conclusions were drawn:

考虑到Binance，Coinbase，OKX，BYBIT和UPBIT交流的市场份额，增长率和上市效应，得出了以下结论：

T0 Level: Continue Capital, Placeholder, and YZi Labs (Binance Labs) showed remarkable performance.

T0级别：继续资本，占位符和Yzi Labs（Binance Labs）表现出色。

T1 Level: IOSG Ventures, Hack VC, Bain Capital Ventures, and Mint Ventures displayed excellent performance.

T1级别：IOSG Ventures，Hack VC，Bain Capital Ventures和Mint Ventures表现出色。

T2 Level: Paradigm, Sequoia China, Sequoia Capital, Multicoin, and Polychain performed at a high level.

T2水平：高水平进行的范式，红杉中国，红杉资本，多蛋白和多chain。

T3 Level: a16z, Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures, and 1kx achieved a good level of performance.

T3级别：A16Z，Dragonfly，Coinbase Ventures和1KX的性能水平良好。

T4 Level: Circle Ventures, Hashkey Capital, DCG, Bankless Ventures, and TLV Capital performed at an average level.

T4级别：Circle Ventures，Hashkey Capital，DCG，Bankless Ventures和TLV Capital平均进行。

T5 Level: Hash Global, Haun Venture, BTX Capital, and Incuba Alpha performed at a lower level.

T5水平：Hash Global，Haun Venture，BTX Capital和Incuba Alpha在较低级别上进行。

In terms of regional ranking, foreign VCs outperformed exchange VCs, who in turn outperformed domestic VCs.

在区域排名方面，外国风险投资人的表现优于交换风险投资，后者又超过了国内风险投资。

An average level was calculated based on the tokens listed by each VC.

平均水平是根据每个VC列出的令牌计算的。

31 "excellent" VCs performed above the average level, providing a better reference point.

31“优秀”的风投在平均水平以上执行，提供了更好的参考点。

The chart and Thread contain more detailed data for each VC.

图表和线程包含每个VC的更多详细数据。