VC上市率：Binance Labs，佔位符，YZI Labs（Binance Labs）是T0級別

再花24小時組織，努力完美！希望每個人都可以參考更詳細和全面的內容！

Evan, an author and crypto enthusiast with the handle @EvanCrypto17, has been tirelessly working to provide more detailed and comprehensive content for his followers.

埃文（Evan）是The Wander @evancrypto17的作家和加密愛好者，一直在努力為他的追隨者提供更詳細和全面的內容。

In his previous post, he selected three exchanges—Binance, OKX, and Coinbase—and presented an analysis of the top-rated VCs based on the tokens listed on these exchanges.

在他的上一篇文章中，他選擇了三個交流（Binance，Okx和Coinbase），並根據這些交易所上列出的代幣進行了對頂級VCS的分析。

This time, he updated the listing rates for Bybit and Upbit and included more indicators for better statistical results.

這次，他更新了BYBIT和UPBIT的上市率，並提供了更多指標，以獲得更好的統計結果。

In this edition, he added the unaccounted VCs, Bybit listing rate, Upbit listing rate, VC average listing rate, excellent VC evaluation, and more objective quantitative scores.

在此版本中，他添加了未劃分的VC，BYBIT上市率，UPBIT上市率，VC平均上市率，出色的VC評估和更客觀的定量分數。

The UI interface has also been designed to be more user-friendly and visually appealing.

UI界面還設計為更具用戶友好和視覺吸引力。

A total of 73 VCs were included in the ranking, encompassing 35 domestic VCs, 30 foreign VCs, and 8 exchange VCs.

排名中總共包括73個VC，其中包括35個國內風險投資，30個外國VC和8個Exchange VCS。

It's important to note that this rating is based solely on the listing of tokens and does not factor in the overall strength and brand influence of the VCs.

重要的是要注意，該評級僅基於令牌的清單，而不會考慮VCS的整體強度和品牌影響。

Considering the market share, growth rate, and listing effect of Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, and Upbit exchanges, the following conclusions were drawn:

考慮到Binance，Coinbase，OKX，BYBIT和UPBIT交流的市場份額，增長率和上市效應，得出了以下結論：

T0 Level: Continue Capital, Placeholder, and YZi Labs (Binance Labs) showed remarkable performance.

T0級別：繼續資本，佔位符和Yzi Labs（Binance Labs）表現出色。

T1 Level: IOSG Ventures, Hack VC, Bain Capital Ventures, and Mint Ventures displayed excellent performance.

T1級別：IOSG Ventures，Hack VC，Bain Capital Ventures和Mint Ventures表現出色。

T2 Level: Paradigm, Sequoia China, Sequoia Capital, Multicoin, and Polychain performed at a high level.

T2水平：高水平進行的範式，紅杉中國，紅杉資本，多蛋白和多chain。

T3 Level: a16z, Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures, and 1kx achieved a good level of performance.

T3級別：A16Z，Dragonfly，Coinbase Ventures和1KX的性能水平良好。

T4 Level: Circle Ventures, Hashkey Capital, DCG, Bankless Ventures, and TLV Capital performed at an average level.

T4級別：Circle Ventures，Hashkey Capital，DCG，Bankless Ventures和TLV Capital平均進行。

T5 Level: Hash Global, Haun Venture, BTX Capital, and Incuba Alpha performed at a lower level.

T5水平：Hash Global，Haun Venture，BTX Capital和Incuba Alpha在較低級別上進行。

In terms of regional ranking, foreign VCs outperformed exchange VCs, who in turn outperformed domestic VCs.

在區域排名方面，外國風險投資人的表現優於交換風險投資，後者又超過了國內風險投資。

An average level was calculated based on the tokens listed by each VC.

平均水平是根據每個VC列出的令牌計算的。

31 "excellent" VCs performed above the average level, providing a better reference point.

31“優秀”的風投在平均水平以上執行，提供了更好的參考點。

The chart and Thread contain more detailed data for each VC.

圖表和線程包含每個VC的更多詳細數據。